Responses to Unlicensed pair fined for administering fatal

[Guest guest]

Regarding the " Unlicensed pair fined for administering fatal fast " message, here

are a few responses that were sent to me (so I am keeping them anonymous). No, I

don't know enough about the situation but I knew others would. I knew the post

would open up a discussion which is why I sent it along rather than just letting

the original message be circulated elsewhere. Draw your own conclusions.........

 

 

 

" Oh, I wish you'd taken time to find out more before publishing this. "

 

 

 

" consider eating -being GENEFIT or instinctual. listen to your own senses to

know your truth. who else can you rely on? " God " or truth is inside YOU! it

takes a considerable investment of time. no quick fixes, patience required Sat

Nam "

 

 

 

" With all respect to both Tim and Loren, they are good people. Unfortunately

this is one of the misgivings of a purely natural hygiene approach. There were

mistakes made. Clayton college, etc does not prepare practitioners for advanced

medical decisions. Stephen Barrett is a ruthless - " quackbuster " so any info

from him is biased, he is avidly against most things I do.

 

However, the attacks were " overkill " and I do not know who gets the $390,000. I

do not know what else to say, however one needs to understand the difference

between medical support and supervision, and simply being a caregiver during

fasting. I believe it would be detrimental for our community to defend that

these cases were managed correctly. And I know that I have made mistakes in my

days and probably will again, though I would never just take someone off insulin

without constant monitoring, etc.

 

I just felt the need to add some perspective, please understand if I do not take

the time to continue fully in dialogue for this issue, though I will be reading

any responses. "