Guest guest Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 I took to heart all the posts on here about not posting from other forums and stopping the arguing on here, but I still think this is helpful information. ------ On 5/4/05, Someone wrote ------ Here's the quote on Eve's extensive knowledge of nutrition: P.834 - §5 <i>The Adamic children did not take milk from animals when they ceased to nurse the mother's breast at one year of age. Eve had access to the milk of a great variety of nuts and to the juices of many fruits, and knowing full well the chemistry and energy of these foods, she suitably combined them for the nourishment of her children until the appearance of teeth. " </i> Makes one wonder if 1 or 2% violet bloods like us could survive on this diet for a lifetime, or even if we can be very effective at reforming self-defeating nutritional habits before the gene pool is cleaned up (Let's face it, much nutritional debility is genetic, yes?), and until solid science comes along. This quote reveals how little we truly know of human chemical/life compounds and the proper recipe to produce children and adults of superb health and therefore greater potential for soul evolution. Rich: I don't think we're much different from the violet race. I would put the figure at 80%. And since they practiced vegetarianism, I think it's good for us too. Someone: The science of nutrition is in its infancy, but insights like this will speak volumes to the succeeding generation of scientists as society begins to amass reliable data on this most crippling, or enabling, human activity. But given the best possible nutrition, it is nothing without heart. Much love. Rich: I don't hear of people dying of starvation but I do here of them having horrible illnesses and I think it's mostly due to their diet. I think you can eat pretty much anything and be healthy, as long as you eat. You get all the nutrition you need from virtually any diet. Much love. ------ On 5/4/05, Someone wrote ------ I have spent the last 35 years studying nutrition. Below are some of my thoughts. Drinking five eight ounce glasses of water a day could probably be the healthiest thing we do. Rich: I think it depends on your diet. As a raw vegan, I get most of my water needs from the produce itself. But if you're eating the Standard American Diet (SAD) then you're probably well off drinking a lot of water to try and cleanse yourself. Someone: Foods such as meats cooked in certain oils is life shortening. Rich: I don't want to play games with the issue. If meat isn't good for me in general, then I don't want to eat any of it. Someone: As a rule most food bought in a supermarket that is not on the perimeter isle is bad for you. Rich: I like the first aisle, I don't think dairy is very good for people either. Someone: I do not think food grown with chemicals is bad for you. Rich: I don't worry about organic or not organic. Organic usually tastes a little better, sometimes a lot better, but it's not easy enough to come by. Food grown with chemicals doesn't affect me mentally and that's my main concern, my spiritual growth. Someone: A vegetarian diet without supervision-study is debilitating. Balance is the key. Rich: It can be debilitating if your not ready for it mentally, trying to switch over from the all-American diet. I don't think it needs to be studied though, but I'll be my own guinea pig and let you know how it turns out in a couple of years. I'm not going to balance what's proper with what's improper as far as I understand it. Someone: Exersize is the glue that holds things together. Rich: I don't exercise, I walk a lot during a day though, that's enough exercise for me. As a raw vegan my body's healthy enough without formal exercise, but I would agree that someone on the regular diet should exercise for detox purposes. ------ On 5/4/05, Someone wrote ------ People could make healthier decisions if they'd just read the fricken list of ingredients! All food manafacturers in the US are required by law to make this information available. Aspartame and hydrogenated oils should be avoided. It's easy to say our knowledge of nutrition is still in its infancy, but the fact is few bother to educated themselves. For instance foods that are acidic. Your body wants to maintain a balance (ph). When the acid level gets too high the chemical necessary to reduce it has to come from somewhere and if not from your diet then from your bones (calcium) - hence osteoporosis (loss of bone density). Sure you could pop a pill, but that doesn't really solve the problem. It just alleviates the symptoms like most modern day medicines are only good for. Rich: Personally, I don't need to know the ingredients, I trust my intuition that I'll stay healthy being a raw vegan. I don't want to play games with what to avoid and what not to avoid. It's much easier and saves time to just play it safe and easy and avoid all things that could be a problem. People suffer more from too much calcium because of dairy products than not enough calcium, much more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 rawfood , " Froggy " <seconaphim> wrote: > I took to heart all the posts on here about not posting from other > forums and stopping the arguing on here, but I still think this is > helpful information. > > ------ On 5/4/05, Someone wrote ------ > > Here's the quote on Eve's extensive knowledge of nutrition: > > P.834 - §5 <i>The Adamic children did not take milk from animals > when > they ceased to nurse the mother's breast at one year of age. Eve had > access to the milk of a great variety of nuts and to the juices of > many fruits, and knowing full well the chemistry and energy of these > foods, she suitably combined them for the nourishment of her > children > until the appearance of teeth. " </i> > > Makes one wonder if 1 or 2% violet bloods like us could survive on > this diet for a lifetime, or even if we can be very effective at > reforming self-defeating nutritional habits before > the gene pool is cleaned up (Let's face it, much nutritional > debility > is genetic, yes?), ----snip---- Hi Rich... quick one re: " much nutritional debility is genetic, yes? " - I'd say probably not, *if* nutritional debility could be said to lead to chronic diseases... In the China Study, Campbell found that genetics only had a 2-3% contribution factor...exact page not remembered.. all the best, Bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.