Guest guest Posted April 17, 2005 Report Share Posted April 17, 2005 re: " , Ford actually formed a team of engineers to > reverse-engineer some Japanese cars and " prove " they were no better. The > resulting report, apparently more than a foot thick, listed all the ways in > which the Japanese cars WERE, in fact, superior. Ford execs were > dumb-founded and responded with a wonderful marketing slogan, " At Ford, > quality is Job One. " ----- similar story at GM, same time period. For a week, I worked at one of the GM plants. They were just concluding a study comparing two cars, one GM and one Japanese, that had the " exact " drive trains (models since forgotten..). GM, when measuring the ID of a Japanese shaft part, thought that thier measuring equipment was broken, because, they were showing " zero " deviation in the measurements. They then went to their own, being GM's parts, and found that their measuring equipment was working just fine...it was that the Japanese shaft part really did show no measurable difference amongst all the parts tested. GM did note, however, that while all the Japanese parts were " within specs " , that they all were at the very minimum of the specification. And when you think about it, sufficiency reigned: using only the minimum amount of material to do the job, and ensuring a very tight fit. brilliant, and I see it as applying to our bodies also: the principle of sufficiency referenced earlier.. just catching up... all the best, Bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.