Guest guest Posted April 15, 2005 Report Share Posted April 15, 2005 rawfood On Behalf Of Michael Thursday, April 14, 2005 5:04 PM rawfood Re: [Raw Food] Eating by design: sprouts, root vegetables (WAS: brocolli sprouts) I've noticed that a lot of the recipies in Dr. Cousens' Rainbow Green book call for a lot of salt, and his ideas seem to be well researched. Has he amended his position on salt yet? _____ Hi Michael, I'll expand your question beyond Gabriel's writings, because the vast majority of RF authors and teachers pass out recipes loaded with salt. For some reason, they seem to have fixed their attention on the tiny quantity of " elements " other than sodium chloride, and most of them truly do not understand that the body does not, except perhaps in the most dire of emergencies, metabolize salt, sodium chloride. Also, there appears to be widespread misunderstanding of the distinction between " minerals " and " elements " (not covered here) and a lack of awareness of the interconnectedness among the various sciences. The issue, from my perspective, is this: Nutritional discussions sit atop health science, which sits atop biology, which sits atop chemistry, which sits atop physics, which sits atop mathematics. If something being said near the top of this stack (say, in this case of salt, in nutritional discussions) conflicts with something from a core science (physics, in this case) then usually (though admittedly not always) the core science is correct and the other materials needs revision. However, if people have never learned much physics or chemistry, and/or of they do not process information in an integrative/interdisciplinary way, then they might never think about an issue as I have suggested. My comments about salt arise from my understanding of the relationship between salt and water. This relationship is generic: the same relationship prevails in a glass, in the ocean, when we salt a frozen road, in the blood. The same general effects always occur...when we add salt, the water gets heavier, its heat-carrying capacity changes, and so on. Ten of ten physicists would agree, there would really be no question about any of this. What then remains is to make the connection back to health, metabolism in general, blood in particular, and eventually nutrition. But I see very few people, both in the RF world and in the world in general, taking such an integrative approach nowadays. We have become a society of specialists, looking for answers to questions about the heads of pins. We may or may not find such answers, but even when we do, they generally will not help us, or help us only in tiny ways! The questions we ask determine the range and scope of the answers we receive. So I focus first and foremost on the questions themselves, not on the answers. Those just seem to come. I do my best not to presume/assume. I do not rely upon any system of " typing, " these always understate the circumstances at hand (at best). I certainly do not accept things as " true " simply because I've heard them repeated a thousand times. I seek the relationships among bits of data and information, not just data and information for its own sake. And I rarely try to prove or demonstrate a point, instead I always look for an open-ended question(s). So for me, the pursuit of knowledge and understanding is an expression of my basic, intrinsic curiosity, not just a search for " how to. " Not sure why I just wrote all this, but seems fitting, so there it is. Best to all, Elchanan Best to all, Elchanan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.