Guest guest Posted March 14, 2005 Report Share Posted March 14, 2005 Please don't feel any need to apologize. Whenever I write something, there are always details missing, and I recognize that the details can be of paramount importance, particularly to those starting out. So I am always most happy to try and fill in any gaps. I will address your question in two ways. First, I am saying that one whole orange contains more nutrients and a more complete balance of nutrients than one juiced orange, given the same level of ripeness. for example, oranges contain a nice quantity of simple sugars (glucose and fructose) already in solution in water, which our bodies can absorb and use a fuel with virtually no digestive processing. That same orange also contains soluble fiber, such as guar and pectin. The fiber actually moderates, or slows down, the absorption of the sugar through our small intestine, preventing us from absorbing the sugar into our blood stream " too quickly, " which is uncomfortable. So the whole food contains nutrients that are removed by juicing. Second, there is the broader issue of depth vs. breadth of nutrients. Our scientific/medical establishment and our food industry have become rather deranged in certain respects, and they have successfully trained most of us to think as they think. For example, they have taught us to think in terms of individual nutrients: am I getting enough B-12, where can I get lycopene, that sort of thing. But Nature does not generally work in this manner. An orange may actually contain thousands of nutrients, including many nutrients not yet discovered or thought to be important by our science. (Remember when the appendix " served no useful purpose? " ) Whenever I consume the whole orange, I get all the nutrients, and in the exact balance created by Nature. In effect, I engage in a spiritual act, an act of faith: I choose to trust that Nature's design works for me. In contrast, whenever I juice, I leave behind many nutrients -- after all, the " pulp " consists of something!! -- and I create a fractional food (fraction of the whole food) of my own design. I KNOW I leave behind nutrients. I choose to trust and go with Nature's design rather than with my own. Of course, this is only my own perspective in the matter, nothing more. Nothing I have written here is " True " or " False " in any absolute sense. Best to all, and please do write back with more or related questions! Elchanan Melissa Thomas [mypinkbow] Monday, March 14, 2005 1:10 PM rawfood Re: [Raw Food] Juicer vs. Blender sorry for not being very intelligent on this entire raw food voyage I find myself on but are you saying then you get more nutrients from juicing the 6 oranges or more from eating the oranage whole or are they equal 6 oranges juiced= 1 orange whole?? thanks melissa --- Bridgitte <syndactylcat wrote: > > In response to this snipet: > > rawfood , " INFO @ Vibrant > Life " <VLinfo@e...> > wrote: > [snip] whereas juicing fractionalized the food > (removes part of the > food) and hyperconcentrates the remainder. [snip] > > Juicers don't actually concentrate anything - they > just expel juice. > But you are getting tons of nutrients (less the > fiber) since it > takes, say, six oranges to make a glass of juice, > rather than eating > just one. > > Bridgitte > > > > Make your home page http://www./r/hs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.