(Rich) Happy day.

[Guest guest]

Eh, I'm not so concerned with the structure. It's obviously much

more moral to be a raw foodist. The people in arctic regions should

move to where they can acquire raw plant food. I would eat raw meat

and meat products if I had to, but there's plenty of plant food

available and I don't have much of a taste for raw meat and other

animal products.

 

Stress is difficult to deal with.

 

Come on now, mothers " are sterile until they include some animal

product. " I don't believe that. The human race would end if their

were no animal products to eat? Or children would be born deformed,

most commonly manifesting brain damage, because the mother didn't eat

any animal products. I think our Creator is a little wiser than that.

 

Rich

 

rawfood , " John L. Fielder "

<academy.natural.living@i...> wrote:

> Hi Rich,

>

> It is my personal opinion that in spite of all that has been

written to the contrary, our bodies are not so much conditioned, as

they are structured, for us to be omnivores and not frugivores. By

this I do not wish it to be understood that I am advocating a high

animal content in our diet - except if we choose to live in the

arctic regions. In fact the empirical evidence suggests that the

reverse is the case. Yet without it in some form or other, whether it

be through insects, as in the chimpanzee's, or dairy as in the

Hunza's, or meat as in the eskimo, all of which is consumed in its

raw form, seems to be of little import.

>

> As to what do I eat. All of the above on regular, irregular basis

via un-washed fruit and vegetables, organically grown, raw goats milk

yoghurt, and raw fish. The regularity is according to the demands of

my body which can vary according to circumstances such as the amount

of physical activity, climatic conditions, amount of stress being

exposed to, etc. Some times it may be on a daily basis. At others

weekly, and even monthly or even bi-monthly or longer as the case may

be.

>

> There appears to be no phase of living that is opposed to a raw

food diet as long as the above conditions are observed. In the

instance that they are not, then I would say that the most

antagonistic phase to no animal intake is that of reproduction.

Mothers do not become mothers. They are sterile until they include

some animal product. Children can be, and often are, born deformed,

with the most common defect manifesting as brain damage to name the

two most outstanding conditions that I have observed.

>

> John

>

>

> John L. Fielder

> Osteopath & Lifestyle Consultant

> Academy of Natural Living

> www.iig.com.au/anl