Guest guest Posted September 10, 2009 Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 Hello all you animal people, I am forwarding an email alert regarding the proposed ban on cat declawing in San Francisco (W. Hollywood was the first city to pass such a ban several years ago). If you are in favor of the ban, the Board of Supervisors needs to hear from you: letters/faxes/emails/calls -- this is especially important if you are a San Francisco resident. The proposal has been referred to the City Operations Committee, and the members of that committee are Supervisors Dufty, Daly and Elsbernd, so it would be good to contact them FIRST, but of course all the others as well. Supervisors' contact info is below, plus talking points. The cats of San Francisco thank you, and I thank you! Nadine May Hey cat lovers, We need your cards, letters and e-mails. The California Veterinary Medical Association is putting the heat on Supervisor Mirkarimi, not to mention the rest of the Supervisors, to kill a ban on Cat Declawing that Supervisor Mirkarimi has introduced. Unfortunately the article that came out in the SF Chronicle 2 weeks ago, written by a former Chron writer who is an SPCA volunteer, framed the issue as a doctor's right to choose whether to declaw or not, not as an issue of animal cruelty. There are some talking points below. We need all the support on this we can get. Please send this to any cat lists you are on, and if you know any veterinarians who are against declawing and not afraid to speak out on the subject, please ask them to contact me: Susan Wheeler, rappwheel or Sally Stephens, stephensfwThank you, Susan SUPPORT SF BAN ON DECLAWING CATS San Francisco Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi has proposed legislation to ban the non-therapeutic declawing of cats in the city. Declawing, the amputation of the last bone in cats' toes, is widely considered animal cruelty when done to protect furniture from scratching or for other non-therapeutic reasons. It has been banned in over 20 countries, including nearly every European nation. Now SF is considering a ban on declawing, except when it is medically necessary for the cat itself (e.g., infection or injury to the toe itself). It is a matter of preventing a form of animal cruelty in the city. The California Veterinary Medical Association is organizing opposition to the ban and has already started to reach out to Supervisors to vote against it. Please let the Supervisors know that you support a ban on non-therapeutic declawing of cats. Let them know if you are a San Francisco resident and one of their constituents. Points you can make include: 1. Society's values have changed and non-therapeutic declawing is no longer acceptable. 2. Declawing can cause intense, lasting pain and cause cats to be more likely to bite and avoid the litter box. These problem behaviors make cats more likely to be surrendered to shelters, where the problem cats are then more likely to not be adopted and therefore more likely to be euthanized in shelters. 3. Humane alternatives to declawing exist, even for people who are immune-compromised. 4. SF tried education about declawing in 2003 when the Board of Supervisors passed a resolution calling on cat guardians and veterinarians not to declaw cats. Advocates considered pushing for a ban then, but decided to try education first. It did not work. There are still people in SF who will not try the alternatives and there are still people who will do the procedure simply because they are asked to do so. 5. Declawing is not necessary for immune-compromised individuals. Cat bites (more likely in declawed cats) pose a more serious health risk of infection than cat scratches. The US Public Health Service "Guidelines for the Prevention of Opportunistic Infections in Persons Infected with HIV" state: "Akthoughdeclawing is not generally advised, HIV-infected persons should avoid rough play with cats and situations in which scratches are unlikely." 6. The proposed ban will not effect medically necessary declawings done to protect the health of the cat, e.g., infections or injuries to the toes themselves. 7. Opposition to the proposed ban is being driven largely by the California Veterinary Medical Association, who have a financial stake in whether or not larger numbers of declawings are done. Please thank Supervisor Mirkarimi and let him know that you support the ban. Let the other Supervisors know you support the ban on non-therapeutic declawing of cats. Contact info is given below: Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi (415) 554-7630 - voice (415) 554-7634 - fax Ross.Mirkarimi Supervisor David Chiu (415) 554-7450 - voice (415) 554-7454 - fax David.Chiu Supervisor Bevan Dufty (415) 554-6968 - voice (415) 554-6909 - fax Bevan.Dufty Supervisor Eric Mar (415) 554-7410 - voice (415) 554-7415 - fax Eric.L.Mar Supervisor Michela Alioto-Pier (415) 554-7752 - voice (415) 554-7843 - fax Michela.Alioto-Pier Supervisor Carmen Chu (415) 554-7460 - voice (415) 554-7432 - fax Carmen.Chu Supervisor Chris Daly (415) 554-7970 - voice (415) 554-7974 - fax Chris.Daly Supervisor Sean Elsbernd (415) 554-6516 - voice (415) 554-6546 - fax Sean.Elsbernd Supervisor Sophie Maxwell (415) 554-7670 - voice (415) 554-7674 - fax Sophie.Maxwell Supervisor John Avalos (415) 554-6975 - voice (415) 554-6979 - fax John.Avalos Supervisor David Campos (415) 554-5144 - Voice (415) 554-6255 - Fax David.Campos All Supervisors can be reached by snail mail at: City Hall 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, Ca 94102-4689 Sally Stephens <stephensfwrappwheelSent: Tue, Sep 8, 2009 3:33 pmparagraphs to send out to groups Susan, How's this for a few paragraphs to be sent out to your various groups? Feel free to edit it as you see fit. -- Sally SUPPORT SF BAN ON DECLAWING CATS San Francisco Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi has proposed legislation to ban the non-therapeutic declawing of cats in the city. Declawing, the amputation of the last bone in cats' toes, is widely considered animal cruelty when done to protect furniture from scratching or for other non-therapeutic reasons. It has been banned in over 20 countries, including nearly every European nation. Now SF is considering a ban on declawing, except when it is medically necessary for the cat itself (e.g., infection or injury to the toe itself). It is a matter of preventing a form of animal cruelty in the city. The California Veterinary Medical Association is organizing opposition to the ban and has already started to reach out to Supervisors to vote against it. Please let the Supervisors know that you support a ban on non-therapeutic declawing of cats. Let them know if you are a San Francisco resident and one of their constituents. Points you can make include: 1. Society's values have changed and non-therapeutic declawing is no longer acceptable. 2. Declawing can cause intense, lasting pain and cause cats to be more likely to bite and avoid the litter box. These problem behaviors make cats more likely to be surrendered to shelters, where the problem cats are then more likely to not be adopted and therefore more likely to be euthanized in shelters. 3. Humane alternatives to declawing exist, even for people who are immune-compromised. 4. SF tried education about declawing in 2003 when the Board of Supervisors passed a resolution calling on cat guardians and veterinarians not to declaw cats. Advocates considered pushing for a ban then, but decided to try education first. It did not work. There are still people in SF who will not try the alternatives and there are still people who will do the procedure simply because they are asked to do so. 5. Declawing is not necessary for immune-compromised individuals. Cat bites (more likely in declawed cats) pose a more serious health risk of infection than cat scratches. The US Public Health Service "Guidelines for the Prevention of Opportunistic Infections in Persons Infected with HIV" state: "Akthoughdeclawing is not generally advised, HIV-infected persons should avoid rough play with cats and situations in which scratches are unlikely." 6. The proposed ban will not effect medically necessary declawings done to protect the health of the cat, e.g., infections or injuries to the toes themselves. 7. Opposition to the proposed ban is being driven largely by the California Veterinary Medical Association, who have a financial stake in whether or not larger numbers of declawings are done. Please thank Supervisor Mirkarimi and let him know that you support the ban. Let the other Supervisors know you support the ban on non-therapeutic declawing of cats. Contact info is given below: Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi (415) 554-7630 - voice (415) 554-7634 - fax Ross.Mirkarimi Supervisor David Chiu (415) 554-7450 - voice (415) 554-7454 - fax David.Chiu Supervisor Bevan Dufty (415) 554-6968 - voice (415) 554-6909 - fax Bevan.Dufty Supervisor Eric Mar (415) 554-7410 - voice (415) 554-7415 - fax Eric.L.Mar Supervisor Michela Alioto-Pier (415) 554-7752 - voice (415) 554-7843 - fax Michela.Alioto-Pier Supervisor Carmen Chu (415) 554-7460 - voice (415) 554-7432 - fax Carmen.Chu Supervisor Chris Daly (415) 554-7970 - voice (415) 554-7974 - fax Chris.Daly Supervisor Sean Elsbernd (415) 554-6516 - voice (415) 554-6546 - fax Sean.Elsbernd Supervisor Sophie Maxwell (415) 554-7670 - voice (415) 554-7674 - fax Sophie.Maxwell Supervisor John Avalos (415) 554-6975 - voice (415) 554-6979 - fax John.Avalos Supervisor David Campos (415) 554-5144 - Voice (415) 554-6255 - Fax David.Campos All Supervisors can be reached by snail mail at: City Hall 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, Ca 94102-4689 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.