Guest guest Posted February 13, 2003 Report Share Posted February 13, 2003 A simple yes or no suffices to demonstrate my point. In other words, if there are articles of faith necessary to qualify one as a Quaker, then there is dogma. If not, then not. On Thursday, February 13, 2003, at 09:13 PM, wrote: > Message: 9 > Fri, 14 Feb 2003 10:10:52 +1100 > " Lady Sappho " <ladysappho > Re: Further Thinking > >> Are there any items of faith one must believe to be a Quaker? > > Um, just for the sake of your mental health, I would advise that you > seriously think about just how much of an answer you want to that! I have > written numerous posts about Liberal Quakerism to try and explain it to > people who come from more ... rigid backgrounds and they seem to end up > with > splitting headaches (from stuff which makes perfect sense to me!) > > Lee-Gwen > " I have missed more than 9,000 shots, lost almost 300 games, on 26 occasions been entrusted to take the game-winning shot - and missed. I have failed over and over and over again in my life. And that, is why I succeed! " -- Michael Jordan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.