Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

CommonDreams.org No recipe.

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

[Whether you feel comfortable on the right or the left, this thought

provoking article raises questions that ought to concern us all. DaveO]

 

 

Published on Friday, January 31, 2003 by CommonDreams.org

" If You Want To Win An Election, Just Control The Voting Machines "

by Thom Hartmann**

 

Maybe Nebraska Republican Chuck Hagel honestly won two US Senate elections.

Maybe it's true that the citizens of Georgia simply decided that incumbent

Democratic Senator Max Cleland, a wildly popular war veteran who lost three

limbs in Vietnam, was, as his successful Republican challenger suggested in

his campaign ads, too unpatriotic to remain in the Senate. Maybe George W.

Bush, Alabama's new Republican governor Bob Riley, and a small but

congressionally decisive handful of other long-shot Republican candidates

really did win those states where conventional wisdom and straw polls showed

them losing in the last few election cycles.

 

Perhaps, after a half-century of fine-tuning exit polling to such a science

that it's now sometimes used to verify how clean elections are in Third

World countries, it really did suddenly become inaccurate in the United

States in the past six years and just won't work here anymore. Perhaps it's

just a coincidence that the sudden rise of inaccurate exit polls happened

around the same time corporate-programmed, computer-controlled,

modem-capable voting machines began recording and tabulating ballots.

 

But if any of this is true, there's not much of a paper trail from the

voters' hand to prove it.

 

You'd think in an open democracy that the government - answerable to all its

citizens rather than a handful of corporate officers and stockholders -

would program, repair, and control the voting machines. You'd think the

computers that handle our cherished ballots would be open and their software

and programming available for public scrutiny. You'd think there would be a

paper trail of the vote, which could be followed and audited if a there was

evidence of voting fraud or if exit polls disagreed with computerized vote

counts.

 

You'd be wrong...

 

[The entire article is posted here:

http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0131-01.htm ]

 

 

 

**Thom Hartmann is the author of " Unequal Protection: The Rise of Corporate

Dominance and the Theft of Human Rights. " www.unequalprotection.com This

article is copyright by Thom Hartmann, but permission is granted for reprint

in print, email, or web media so long as this credit is attached.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...