Food Without Fear--New York Times

November 23, 2004

Sign up for real estate

e-mail alerts

NYTimes: Home - Site Index - Archive - Help

Welcome, shiaoyun - Member Center - Log Out

Go to a Section ----------------------- Arts Automobiles Books Business

Cartoons Classifieds Corrections Crossword/Games Dining & Wine Editorials/Op-Ed

Education Fashion & Style Health Home & Garden International Job Market Learning

Network Magazine Movies Multimedia/Photos NYC Guide NYT Front Page National New

York Region Obituaries Readers' Opinions Real Estate Science Sports Technology

The Public Editor Theater Travel Washington Weather Week in Review

----------------------- Services

Site Search:

NYTimes.com > Opinion

OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR

Food Without Fear

By DAN BARBER

Published: November 23, 2004

ARTICLE TOOLS

E-Mail This Article

Printer-Friendly Format

Most E-Mailed Articles

READERS' OPINIONS

Forum: Join a Discussion on Op-Ed Contributors

TIMES NEWS TRACKER

Topics

Alerts

Food

Fads

Organic Foods

Barber, Dan

Track news that interests you.

ocantico Hills, N.Y.

Now that the bloom is finally off the Atkins diet rose, now that the

instinct to, say, make a purée of potatoes feels slightly less suicidal, let us

take a moment to realize that, when it comes to food, Americans have the

tendency to lose all reason. With the same collective head-scratching that goes

on when we look back at the big hair and shoulder pads of the 80's, we would do

well to ask: What were we thinking?

This question, of course, applies not just to the Atkins diet but to

pretty much every diet fad Americans have followed over the last 30 years. In

addition to catchy names, these diets tend to have one thing in common: they

focus on what we eat - not on where what we eat comes from or how it was grown.

Good nutrition has been conveniently, and profitably, reduced to an ingredient

list. (Remember the grapefruit diet?)

That's a shame - and there's no better time to explore the ways in

which we've been led astray than during Thanksgiving week, a time when Americans

are particularly focused on food. (And, coincidentally, a time when we are

blessedly between diet fads.) With a little scrutiny, we can see that our

reductionist diet logic dissolves like a lump of sugar. Just consider the

traditional Thanksgiving spread: it may appear to represent the American

pastoral, but looks can be deceiving.

Start with the turkey. If your image of a turkey's life is one of

green grass and rolling hills, look more closely. Nearly 300 million turkeys are

raised today on factory farms where they live in windowless buildings

illuminated by bright lights 24 hours a day. (This keeps the turkeys awake and

eating.) The birds stand wing to wing on wood shavings and eat an overly

fortified diet that enables them to reach an ideal dressed weight of 15 pounds

in 12 to 14 weeks. The most popular breed is the Broad Breasted White, aptly

named because these turkeys develop disproportionately large breasts, which

makes it difficult for the birds to walk (if they had room to do so) and

procreate (assuming they'd want to) without artificial insemination.

So what kind of bird would fit more accurately with our agrarian

fantasies? Well, how about one that spends most of its life outdoors? Such birds

- called pastured birds - are able to move around freely. Instead of having to

be injected with antibiotics to stay healthy, they doctor themselves, seeking

out certain plants at certain times of the year for pharmacological reasons.

Because they expend so much energy moving around, they also grow more slowly: it

takes them a month longer to reach slaughter weight than factory birds, which is

one of the reasons pasturing is less attractive to industrial farmers.

Scientific research comparing the health benefits of conventionally raised

turkey to pastured turkey is scarce, but some work has been done on chickens. A

study sponsored by the Department of Agriculture in 1999, for example, found

that pastured chickens have 21 percent less fat, 30 percent less saturated fat,

50 percent more vitamin A and 400 percent more omega-3 fatty acids than

factory-raised birds. They also have 34 percent less cholesterol.

The pasture principle isn't limited to fowl. Compared to most

American beef, which is raised on a grain-intensive diet, pasture-fed beef

offers 400 percent more vitamin A and E. It is also much richer in beta-carotene

and conjugated linoleic acids, all of which inhibit cancer. It's also higher in

omega-3 fatty acids, which are a major inhibitor of heart disease. These

benefits don't exist at these levels in animal that are fed an unvaried and

unnatural diet.

The pasture principle can be applied to vegetables as well. We don't

live off the food we eat - we live off the energy in the food we eat. So while

Mom asked us, " Did you eat your fruits and vegetables? " today we might well ask:

" What are our vegetables eating? "

It seems axiomatic but it's worth remembering that in order to

experience the health benefits of the roasted broccoli at the Thanksgiving

table, that broccoli needs to have been healthy too. We can be forgiven for

ignoring the obvious because most every diet I've seen treats a head of broccoli

the way Gertrude Stein talked about a rose - but a broccoli is not a broccoli is

not a broccoli, especially if you consider how and from where its grown.

Sadly, the broccoli and the other brassicas on your holiday table

(brussels sprouts, cabbage, turnips, kale, mustard greens) were most likely

grown in a monoculture - a place where, with the help of large amounts of

chemical fertilizers and pesticides, nothing but the crop is allowed to grow.

Fertilizers are as pervasive in these large farms as tractors, especially

synthetic nitrogen. And you can understand why: the chemicals bulk up vegetables

beautifully and quickly, enabling them to withstand the rigors of long-distance

travel so that they can arrive at your supermarket unbruised and brightly

colored. But it's a little like dating someone on steroids: the look and feel

may be an initially appealing, but in the end it's all kind of disconcerting.

And think what gets lost. A serving of broccoli is naturally rich in

vitamins A and B, and has more vitamin C than citrus fruit. But raised in an

industrial farm monoculture, shipped over a long distance and stored before and

after being delivered to your supermarket, it loses up to 80 percent of its

vitamin C and 95 percent of its calcium, iron and potassium. Fruits and

vegetables grown organically, however, have higher levels of antioxidants.

That's largely because a plant's natural defense system produces phenolic

compounds, chemicals that act as a plant's defense against pests and bugs. These

compounds are beneficial to our health, too. When plants are grown with

herbicides and pesticides, they slow down their production of these compounds.

(Even more important, from a cook's point of view, organically grown fruits and

vegetables taste better - their flavors practically burst from the ground and

demand to be expressed, and we chefs merely comply.)

The same rules apply to the root vegetables, whether potatoes,

sunchokes, beets, parsnips or carrots. Seek out ones grown in nutrient-rich soil

for the greatest flavor and benefit. You can't buy good quality soil in a bag

any more than you can buy good nutrition in a pill. Most organic farmers

encourage complex relationships between crop roots, soil microbes and minerals -

relationships that become wholly disrupted by chemical additives.

What about the milk and eggs that go into Thanksgiving pies and

tarts? The industrialization of our food supply did not spare the dairy

industry. Not surprisingly, pastured dairy cattle and laying hens produce more

nutritious milk and cheese - pastured eggs in particular, with their glowing

yellow yolks, have up to three times the amount of cancer-fighting omega-3's of

eggs that come from factory hens.

As a chef, I am often mystified as I hear diners, rooting around for

a nutrition and dietary cure, ask for this steamed and that on the side, and in

the process deny themselves pleasure. Choosing what dietary advice of the moment

to follow by putting a wet finger up to the wind, our patrons decide, or

succumb, en masse, to a pummeling of such wearisome regularity that it begins to

resemble the " rosebud'' of " Citizen Kane " : the clue that solves everything but

means nothing.

There is an ecology of eating. Like any good ecosystem, our diet

should be diverse, dynamic and interrelated. In 1984 Americans were spending

roughly 8 percent of their disposable income on health care and about 15 percent

on food. Today, those numbers are essentially reversed. An ever-more

reductionist diet - protein this year, carbohydrates next year - ignores plant

and animal systems loaded with genetic complexity, and the benefits that

complexity passes down to us.

So as you're getting ready for Thanksgiving, think of yourself less

as a consumer of the harvest bounty and more, in the words of Carlo Petrini of

the Slow Foods movement, as a co-producer. Try to remember what you know

intuitively: that we can't be healthy unless our farms our healthy; that the end

of the food chain is connected to the beginning of the food chain; that we can't

lose touch with the culture in agriculture (it dates back to before Dr. Atkins).

To the extent possible, shop at farmers markets for your Thanksgiving foods. Try

to choose diversity over the abundance that the big food chains offer. Your food

will be tastier, fresher and more nutritious. You'll be able to have your cake

(and your bacon and your bread and your potatoes) and eat it too.

Dan Barber is the chef of Blue Hill at Stone Barns and creative

director of the Stone Barns Center for Food and Agriculture.

Subscribe Today: Home Delivery of The Times from $2.90/wk.

Sign In

Food Without Fear--New York Times

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Join the conversation

Support the Ashram

Join Groups

Top Downloads