Guest guest Posted July 5, 2002 Report Share Posted July 5, 2002 From another list ... Jo >> As you are my representative of democracy to make necessary changes in the >> name of justice and freedom, I write to you in the request that you read >and follow the guidelines below. >> >> Our demand, as informed citizens of the world, is to have an immediate, >> public and legally-binding Judicial Inquiry into vivisection. The 1986 >> Animals in Scientific Research Act is legislation responsible for immeasurable death. >> >> On Saturday 7th September there will be a mass-rally, march and demonstration with scientific speakers at the BBC. We will be requesting the BBC give airtime for an open real-time debate which will have equal >numbers of self-chosen scientific representatives who will openly and publicly >> debate vivisection from the anti and pro sides. >> >> There has not been a single undercover investigation of a US or UK lab >that has resulted in the following expose showing the lab to be of even a legal >> standard, despite the tiny number of government inspectors who have been >> shown to not inspect according to the welfare ethics of the >pro-vivisection 3 Rs 1986 ASP Act guidelines. >> >> The duplication of products to be tested on animals is overwhelming. There >> is no reduction in numbers of procedures only growth; replacement is as >> flawed as the animal-based methodology which it is claimed to >> 'alternatively' replace and the refinement is another name to grade an >> experiment less painful but just as lethal. The pharmaceutical industry >spins its own products, uses 'named' ghost-writers and is overwhelmingly >biased about the efficacy and accuracy of data and products. >> >> At present, the bulk of vivisection is not for pharmaceuticals but for >> household, lifestyle, industrial toxins, pesticides and agro-chemicals. >The fourth biggest killer in the UK is cancer. These poisons are a major cause >> of cancer. We are then treated with pharmaceuticals. The third biggest >> killer in the UK is adverse drug reactions by prescribed pharmaceuticals, >> all animal tested. The total number of ADRs is now considered to be only >5 -10 % of the total reported. These facts have been clearly researched and >are available in the major scientific journals. Vivisection is killing us. >> >> Vivisection's accuracy ranges from 5 - 25%. Genuine human-based scientific >> research methods are around 95% accurate. There should be no discrepancy. >> >> Why do vivisectors flatly refuse to accept the best model for the human is the human ? >> >> We want the end of funding of ill-health to become the funding of health. >> >> We want human-based scientific research methods and human-based clinical >> observation. These methods are not 'alternatives' but are true scientific >> research which is attainable now. >> >> We are calling for an equally-based open debate at the BBC. >> >> We are requesting an immediate Judicial Inquiry. >> >> I ask you to represent me and demand the same. >> >> Vivisection is a medically unjustified fraud which kills millions of >humans and other animals every year. It goes unquestioned by the authorities who >> make money from the suffering it causes. >> >> DEMAND A UK JUDICIAL INQUIRY!!! >> March and rally, London, September 7th 2002 >> Email alleycats for more information. >> >> >> Free information by email from vivisectionkills >> Or see http://vivisection-absurd.org.uk/ for everything you ever wanted to know and more. >> >> Send no mail to this address, contact VIN at vivisectionkills --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.372 / Virus Database: 207 - Release 20/06/02 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.