Guest guest Posted January 5, 2002 Report Share Posted January 5, 2002 > While not wanting to be repetitious I also do not think Jane is homophobic, > but I must agree with Serene because I also took great offense as Jane's > comment, and for more-or-less the same reason. *great offense* - gee thanks Michael! You obviously haven't been reading this thread but I'll repeat myself again - I haven't got anything against gays! I wasn't been offensive or rude, and the discussion wasn't even about gays, it was about the way people respect my veganism when talking to me! This whole gay thing is sidetracking from the original topic and I bet Serene is sitting on the sidelines having a good laugh at us all! I'm sorry you took *great offense* but you really need to lighten up a bit! > To me, expressing any attitude that someone would not be sexually > interested in another because of their gender is both offensive and > dismissive. It is an assumption that people are heterosexual, that this is > normal, and that everyone else is an aberration from this and something > different. Or in the case of homosexual attitudes towards bisexuals, that > it is not normal to be attracted to someone of the opposite gender and to > do so is a denial of who they really are, and an expression of the dominant > cultures attitudes regarding sexuality. > I wasn't being rude, I didn't mean to offend and I certainly don't deserve a post like this! I've explained myself and I'm only sorry that you're too busy concentrating on nit picking to consider my feelings in this either. You offend me too. I'm no longer going to discuss this as I have made my very *liberal* views known to this list. Janey x > Michael > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 7, 2002 Report Share Posted January 7, 2002 Jane, >*great offense* - gee thanks Michael! You obviously haven't been reading >this thread but I'll repeat myself again - I haven't got anything against >gays! I know you weren't being offensive, and I said that at the very beginning of my post (as well as later on) and do not know how I could have made it any clearer. But that doesn't stop me being offended (offense being an emotional reaction) and nothing can be said to change the fact that I did feel offended. And yes I have read the thread, in fact I have just done so again and yet I still see no explanation of why the word woman was capitalized. Had it not been I would have not had any response, had it been a joke I would have laughed but it was neither of these, it struck me as offensive. >I'm sorry you took *great offense* but you really need to lighten up a bit! I am not the one who is making a big issue out of other people's feelings. Incidentally (in response to a later a comment you made) I never asked you to apologize because I knew you weren't meaning to be offensive, I just felt it relevant to express my feelings so you know the effects of what you said, that it wasn't only one person who had disliked them, so you could consider it in future. Personally if someone took at offense at something I said I would like to know so I can at least try and avoid it happening in the future, especially if that offense is caused inadvertently so I would not have realized for myself. >I wasn't being rude I never said you were rude, your reply to me sure was though. As to my further comments I am sorry that they have upset you but they were an explanation of my position and not a reaction to anything you had said. They did begin by saying " To me.. " which I expected would make it clear I was talking about myself and not you. I had not even address the message to you at the top, as I have in this case. This is a mailing list read by over one hundred people, and several of those had contributed to the topic. As such I felt it was right to explain to the one hundred plus people, and particularly to everyone else taking part in the discussion, why I take offense at such comments. Whether the topic of conversation was about homosexuality or not is irrelevant, there was a connotation about it that some of us (two for a certainty) took from it. It saddens me that we are deemed irrelevant and need to 'lighten-up' because we did not understand something in the way intended, usually the onus is on the speaker to get their message across unambiguously, not the listener. I have always avoided taking part in this list because I do not want to cause trouble, it seems that I was right to do so. In future whenever I am offended I will say nothing and instead sit quietly in a corner for fear that people will only think I am nit picking and in case people taking everything I say as being personally addressed to, and solely about, them. I am sorry for my sexuality, and for having feelings, and that in expressing them I have caused you such 'offense' in writing a post that you 'didn't deserve' because of my 'nit-picking' and not ' considering your feelings'. I am well and truly put in my place and will go away to 'lighten-up'. Sigh, " I should have know better, I got what I deserved " . Michael Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 7, 2002 Report Share Posted January 7, 2002 Michael I am sure it is not necessary to sit back and not join in. I think it is good that we can all discuss our feelings in the open. Jo > I have always avoided taking part in this list because I do not want to > cause trouble, it seems that I was right to do so. In future whenever I am > offended I will say nothing and instead sit quietly in a corner for fear > that people will only think I am nit picking and in case people taking > everything I say as being personally addressed to, and solely about, > them. I am sorry for my sexuality, and for having feelings, and that in > expressing them I have caused you such 'offense' in writing a post that you > 'didn't deserve' because of my 'nit-picking' and not ' considering your > feelings'. I am well and truly put in my place and will go away to > 'lighten-up'. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.313 / Virus Database: 174 - Release 02/01/02 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.