Why Lonliness May Damage Your Health

[Guest guest]

S scientists may have uncovered a genetic reason why lonely people may have

poorer health.

The UCLA research, published in Genome Biology, found certain genes were

more active in people who reported feelings of social isolation.

 

Many of the genes identified have links to the immune system and tissue

inflammation - which may be damaging.

 

Other studies have shown clear links between lack of social support and

illnesses such as heart disease.

 

The biological impact of social isolation reaches down into some of

our most important basic internal processes - the activity of our genes.

 

Dr Stephen Cole, UCLA

 

The researchers said that quality, not quantity, of friendships, appeared to

be important.

 

The link between genes and loneliness has been explored before - a recent

Dutch study of 8,000 twins also pointed to the connection.

 

The UCLA research looked in more detail at which genes might be involved.

 

They took 14 volunteers and assessed their level of social interaction using

a scoring system.

 

They then looked at genetic activity in their white blood cells and tried to

compare the results.

 

In their " lonely " volunteers, various genes tended to be " over expressed "

compared with those at the opposite end of the scoring scale.

 

These often had known links to the body's mechanisms for fighting off

disease, such producing inflammation. Too much inflammation can damage

tissues and cause disease.

 

Other genes, including those thought to be important in fighting viruses and

producing immune antibodies, were less active compared with the non-lonely

volunteers.

 

Dr Steven Cole, who led the study, said: " What this shows us is the

biological impact of social isolation reaches down into some of our most

important basic internal processes - the activity of our genes.

 

" These findings provide molecular targets for our efforts to block the

adverse health effects of social isolation. "

 

Close friendships

 

He said the differences he found were not connected to other factors such as

the age, wealth or health of the people involved, but were specifically

connected to their feelings of social isolation.

 

They were unconnected with the size of the person's social network.

 

Dr Cole said: " What counts, at the level of gene expression, is not how many

people you know, it's how many you feel really close to over time. "

 

He said that in future, the gene profile he'd identified might help doctors

work out whether therapies to ease loneliness were effective.

 

Professor Andrew Steptoe, who carries out research into the biological

effects of psychological conditions at University College London, said that

the findings were " plausible " .

 

He said: " We know that social isolation and lack of social support may

compromise your health.

 

" We can say there is an association here, but we can't say definitively that

the social isolation is causing any change in gene expression. "