Guest guest Posted March 9, 2007 Report Share Posted March 9, 2007 FDA POSED TO APPROVE CATTLE DRUG RISKY TO HUMANS Despite warnings from its own advisory board and a dozen health groups, including the American Medical Association, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is set to approve an antibiotic for cattle this spring that could have dangerous consequences for people. The drug, cefquinome, is from a class of powerful antibiotics that are among the few means of treating several serious human infections. This class of antibiotics also includes one drug that is the only effective treatment for cancer patients with serious infections. The FDA was warned that using cefquinome for animals will probably cause bacteria to develop resistance to these antibiotics more quickly, as has happened in Europe. This has also been the case with other antibiotics. The resistant bacteria could subsequently infect people. InterVet Inc. developed cefquinome for respiratory disease in cattle. The FDA's advisors voted to deny the company's request for approval to market it as such after learning that a dozen other effective medicines are already available to treat the disease. " The panel also learned that the disease would be a relatively minor issue but for the stressful conditions under which U.S. cattle are raised, including high-density living spaces and routine shipment on crowded trains for hundreds or thousands of miles, " reports the Washington Post. It continued: " Those 'production dynamics' suppress the animals' immune systems, explained feedlot consultant Kelly Lechtenberg of Oakland, Neb., and virtually guarantee that bovine respiratory disease will be a major problem. " The FDA's approval of the drug is almost required due to a " guidance document " that sets policy for determining the risk that proposed new animal drugs pose to human health. The article explains in detail " how a few words in an obscure regulatory document can sway the government's approach to protecting public health. " " The Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act " has been introduced in both the U.S. House and Senate. Among several measures the bill seeks is to phase out the non-therapeutic use of medically important antibiotics in farmed animals unless the manufacturers can show they pose no danger to public health. It would also require manufacturers to report the amounts of antibiotics they supply for use in animals, the animals to whom the drugs are given, and the uses for which they are supplied. FDA RULES OVERRIDE WARNINGS ABOUT DRUG The Washington Post, Rick Weiss, March 4, 2007 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/03/AR200703030131 1.html BILL WOULD CURB USE OF ANTIBIOTICS IN LIVESTOCK BEEF Cow-Calf Weekly, P. Scott Shearer, Feb. 23, 2007 http://tinyurl.com/37bkfx I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. As a result of war, corporations have been enthroned, and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all the wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the republic is destroyed. I feel, at this moment, more anxiety for the safety of my country than ever before, even in the midst of war. God grant that my suspicions may prove groundless. " Lincoln in a letter to Col. William F. Elkins on November 21, 1864 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.