Guest guest Posted December 15, 2006 Report Share Posted December 15, 2006 Hi Peter, yes you are right. Exciting new theories are being explored every day as to the origins of " Man " The most exciting part is that there are never any conclusions. Science is always evolving, if you will excuse the term. I want to be a walking metamorphosis. Someone who is continuing changing colors grasping, forming new theoris shocking myself into acceptance with every shedding of my skin. We shall yet peek at the explosion known as the big bang. I am glad that we are discussing the big questions in life. Darwinism/branches of life was revolutionary it is the accepted way most leading scientist think. What of the idea that we are a biological and quemical accident? A spontaneous miracle created by the correct condtions. Water. Sun. Energy to turn life on, on this rock third sun. Created by that explosion billions of ages ago when the universe started expanding. Why? I ask. must there be an intelligent creator? Where is the evidence? If there is a God He/She certainly does not hear our complaints or worries. With all the suffering continously occuring in this world, this God is indiferent. The notion of " God " has changed with every millenium. Why must we have a God to feel complete. And what happens if there is no God? Would it be so terrible. What would we do without a father? Take responsibility for ourselves? And what if the origins of the universe and the end of the universe is the same thing? and What if, as hard as we our little brains try, we still could not understand 1/8 of the grandeur and mystery of the universe? When I ask myself about God I always look up, because for me the universe and the question of " God " are inextricably tied, because it was in that big explosion where everything started. -anouk , " Peter " <metalscarab wrote: > > Hi Anouk > > But it doesn't say that evolution can't occur from that moment on. And I > don't think you'll find that all biologists agree that humanity has > developed fom single celled organisms anyway - the process of evolution that > has been observed would be way too slow for that to have occcurred within > the currently popular view of the age of the universe. > > BB > Peter > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.