Guest guest Posted December 14, 2006 Report Share Posted December 14, 2006 and it continues the admin has been wanting to weaponize space since day one U.S. warns of threat to satellites By BARRY SCHWEID, AP Diplomatic Writer Wed Dec 13, 1:58 PM ET WASHINGTON - The Bush administration warned Wednesday against threats by terrorist groups and other nations against U.S. commercial and military satellites, and discounted the need for a treaty aimed at preventing an arms race in space. Undersecretary of State Robert G. Joseph also reasserted U.S. policy that it has a right to use force against hostile nations or terror groups that might try to attack American satellites or ground installations that support space programs. President Bush adopted a new U.S. space policy earlier this year. " We reserve the right to defend ourselves against hostile attacks and interference with our space assets, " Joseph said in prepared remarks to the George C. Marshall Institute. Joseph, the senior arms control official at the State Department, said nations cannot all be counted on to use space purely for peaceful purposes. " A number of countries are exploring and acquiring capabilities to counter, attack, and defeat U.S. space systems, " Joseph said He also said terrorists " understand our vulnerabilities and have targeted our economy in the past, as they did on 9/11. " He said terrorists and enemy states might view the U.S. space program as " a highly lucrative target, " while sophisticated technologies could improve their ability to interfere with U.S. space systems and services. Joseph did not identify terror groups or nations that might have such motives. An aide to Joseph, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the matter, said that information was classified. " For our part, we must take all of these threats seriously because space capabilities are essential " to the U.S. economy and government, Joseph said. He said the U.S. is more reliant on space than any other country. " No nation, no state-actor, should be under the illusion that the United States will tolerate a denial of our right to the use of space for peaceful purposes, " he said. Wade Boese, a spokesman for the private Arms Control Association, challenged the adminstration's policy. He said rejecting additional international arms controls for space runs counter to U.S. security interests " because the United States has the most to lose from an unregulated space arena. " Boese said he believes the administration wants to avoid negotiations in order to preserve the possibility of deploying space-based missile defense systems, such as interceptors. Joseph listed telecommunications, transportation, electrical power, water supply, gas and oil storage, transportation systems, emergency services, banking and finance, and government services as relying heavily on data transmitted by satellites. History repeats itself and each time the price gets higher Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.