Guest guest Posted July 12, 2006 Report Share Posted July 12, 2006 i generally find www.bartleby.com to be a good place t ostart for such things USAGE NOTE: The distinction in meaning between healthy (“possessing good health”) and healthful (“conducive to good health”) was ascribed to the two terms only as late as the 1880s. This distinction, though tenaciously supported by some critics, is belied by citational evidence—healthy has been used to mean “healthful” since the 16th century. Use of healthy in this sense is to be found in the works of many distinguished writers, with this example from John Locke being typical: “Gardening . . . and working in wood, are fit and healthy recreations for a man of study or business.” Therefore, both healthy and healthful are correct in these contexts: a healthy climate, a healthful climate; a healthful diet, a healthy diet. >earthstrm <earthstorm >Jul 12, 2006 8:16 AM > > Re: does this scare the pants off anyone else? > >If only there were a place to go to in order to find out when and >how words were created. > Defending this corruption on which you are sat You tell me what to think, you tell me this and that `Freedom is O.K. you scum` but make sure it`s never used In your defence of liberty I always stand accused Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 12, 2006 Report Share Posted July 12, 2006 Hi Fraggle Ironically, from what I could find, the word healthy actually seems to have first been used to refer to that which is conducive to good health, rather than possessing good health. Although I did find a similar article to the one you've cited (some sentences word for word), it didn't make any reference to the 1880s. Also, interestingly, in my 1987 version of Merriam-Webster, the word " healthful " doesn't appear at all.... I wish I had more time to look into this, as I'm a little intrigued as to how common the word has been in the past, as it seems to have popped up in the 1880s according to bartleby, then disappeared again in US based dictionaries by the mid 1960s, and re-appeared in the 1990s. FWIW, I couldn't find it in any UK / GB based dictionaries at all even from the 1880s. BB Peter - " fraggle " <EBbrewpunx Wednesday, July 12, 2006 8:56 PM Re: Re: does this scare the language off anyone else? i generally find www.bartleby.com to be a good place t ostart for such things USAGE NOTE: The distinction in meaning between healthy ( " possessing good health " ) and healthful ( " conducive to good health " ) was ascribed to the two terms only as late as the 1880s. This distinction, though tenaciously supported by some critics, is belied by citational evidence-healthy has been used to mean " healthful " since the 16th century. Use of healthy in this sense is to be found in the works of many distinguished writers, with this example from John Locke being typical: " Gardening . . . and working in wood, are fit and healthy recreations for a man of study or business. " Therefore, both healthy and healthful are correct in these contexts: a healthy climate, a healthful climate; a healthful diet, a healthy diet. >earthstrm <earthstorm >Jul 12, 2006 8:16 AM > > Re: does this scare the pants off anyone else? > >If only there were a place to go to in order to find out when and >how words were created. > Defending this corruption on which you are sat You tell me what to think, you tell me this and that `Freedom is O.K. you scum` but make sure it`s never used In your defence of liberty I always stand accused To send an email to - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.