California Bill Would Require Evacuation Plans for Pets

[Guest guest]

California Bill Would Require Evacuation Plans for Pets, Livestock

 

June 09, 2006 — By Samantha Young, Associated Press

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Martin Poldervaart knows how water can wreak havoc. When

a levee burst two miles from his Yuba City dairy farm in 1997, 200 of his cows

-- more than half of his herd -- drowned.

 

" It was really sad to see what was left over, " Poldervaart said.

 

Now, a bill being considered by the California Legislature would direct the

state Office of Emergency Services to incorporate animal evacuations into its

operational plans.

 

Advocates of the bill sponsored by Assemblyman Leland Yee, D-San Francisco, say

it will force first responders to take animals into account when evacuating

areas threatened by flood waters, earthquakes, wildfires and other disasters.

 

Critics say such a plan is a waste of taxpayer money and emergency personnel

should focus solely on saving human lives. The Assembly has approved it 76-1 and

it now awaits Senate consideration.

 

" Trying to move a 1,600 pound animal that is frightened is a difficult task, "

said Gary Conover, director of governmental relations for Western United

Dairymen. " If you need to move 200 head of cattle, you can't do it yourself. You

need to know who you can call and when you can get back on your property. "

 

After the El Nino floods of 1997, the state Department of Food and Agriculture

developed contingency plans to rescue cattle, house displaced animals on county

fairgrounds and reunite pets with their owners through a program known as CARES

-- the California Animal Response in Emergency System.

 

The program has been implemented by the state when needed. In the spring, the

department sent inspectors to the San Joaquin Valley to ensure the health and

safety of cattle evacuated from farms near rivers that threatened to overflow

their banks.

 

But the state's lead disaster agency, the Office of Emergency Services, has not

formally adopted the program into its emergency planning, and some fear that

could threaten federal emergency funding to the state.

 

In response to Hurricane Katrina, Congress last month approved a bill that would

require local and state preparedness offices to draw up evacuation plans for

animals. The bill sponsored by Rep. Tom Lantos, D-Calif., calls for cutting

federal emergency grants to states that fail to incorporate animals in their

operational preparedness planning.

 

" The sight of evacuees having to choose between being rescued or remaining with

their pets, perhaps even having to leave behind their service animals they rely

on every day, was just heartbreaking, " Lantos said last month on the House

floor.

 

Republican Assemblyman Ray Haynes, who cast the lone dissenting vote against the

California legislation, said the Legislature should not spend limited taxpayer

money on contingency plans for animals when human lives should be the top

priority.

 

" I just think its a foolish thing to engage in, " he said. " We have a hard enough

time trying to save all the people that are threatened. "

 

Haynes said farmers and livestock owners take out insurance policies covering

the value of their herds if there is a disaster. The responsibility of

evacuating their animals should fall on them, not taxpayers, he said.

 

Source: Associated Press

 

 

I don't wanna be no war hero

Don't want a movie made about me

I don't wanna be no war hero

Just get away from the madness I see