Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

U.S. Interior Department Sued over GMO Plantings

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

U.S. Interior Department Sued over GMO Plantings

 

April 07, 2006 — By Carey Gillam, Reuters

KANSAS CITY, Mo. — A coalition concerned about the cultivation of genetically

modified crops in wildlife refuge areas filed suit against the U.S. Interior

Department Wednesday, saying government workers illegally approved the planting.

 

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Wilmington, Delaware, seeks to

block further cultivation of the crops at the Prime Hook refuge outside Dover,

Delaware. Prime Hook is one of more than 500 federal wildlife refuges.

 

It named as defendants the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and its parent agency,

the Interior Department. The plaintiffs are the Delaware Audubon Society, Public

Employees for Environmental Responsibility and the Center for Food Safety.

 

The plaintiffs said they discovered " a top Bush administration political

appointee " overruled the wildlife refuge manager in allowing the genetically

altered crops to be planted on land designated as a national wildlife refuge in

violation of department policy.

 

Officials with Fish and Wildlife and the Interior Department declined to comment

immediately.

 

The plaintiffs say the genetically modified crops and the pesticides associated

with growing them can have negative effects on birds, aquatic animals, other

wildlife and plant species.

 

" These refuges are supposed to be for wildlife, not chemical companies or

agribusiness, " Gene Hocutt, a spokesman for Public Employees for Environmental

Responsibility, or PEER, said in a statement announcing the lawsuit. " Plowing up

native grasses for mutated row crops constitutes biological malpractice of the

highest order and a betrayal of the purposes of the National Wildlife Refuge

System. "

 

As many as 100,000 acres of refuge lands are under cultivation to genetically

modified crops, according to agency documents obtained by PEER under the Freedom

of Information Act.

 

Source: Reuters

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...