Guest guest Posted February 24, 2006 Report Share Posted February 24, 2006 + INDIA: BT COTTON SEEDS CAUSE ALLERGY A three-member investigation team has investigated reports that farmers of Nirmar region have been suffering from allergies after coming in contact with Bt cotton seed. The team, comprising Dr Ashish Gupta, Ashish Mandloi and Amulya Nidhi, carried out the survey in five villages and interviewed 23 labourers and farmers of Barwani and Dhar district between October and December 2005. The team said the toxins inside the Bt cotton seed were the main reason behind the allergy. Dr Gupta said that all respondents had itching of the skin, while 86% of them had eruptions on the body and 56% had swelling of the face and in some cases the itching was so severe that they had to discontinue their work, or take anti-allergy medicines in order to be able to work. The use of the Bt cotton seed in the past two seasons has made cases of allergies in the region surge. The following is from the conclusions of the report: " All the evidence gathered during the investigation shows that Bt has been causing skin, upper respiratory tract and eye allergy among persons exposed to cotton. The symptoms vary from mild, moderate to very severe to the extent that one woman had to be admitted for 9 days as a result of allergy. The allergy is not restricted to farm labourers involved in picking cotton but has affected labour involved in loading and unloading Bt from villages to market, those involved in its weighing, labourers working in ginning factories, people who carried out other operations in the field of Bt cotton, or farmers who stored cotton in their homes etc. Thus the symptom is affecting people widely exposed at different places. The symptoms were not restricted to one particular farm but several farms in 6 villages... The doctor of this area also has reported a spurt of allergic cases in the last 2 seasons in the cotton season. http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=6268 http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=6278 READ THE REPORT in 2 parts: PART 1 http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=6265 PART 2 http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=6266 Seeds of Deception author Jeffrey Smith comments on the health problems found thus far with Bt toxin: " Mice exposed to Bt-toxin developed an immune response equal to that of cholera toxin, developed a greater susceptibility to allergies, and developed abnormal and excessive cell growth in their small intestines. Farm workers exposed to even the low dose Bt spray showed evidence of allergic sensitivity, and blood tests showed an immune response. Preliminary evidence found that thirty-nine Philippinos living next to a Bt maize field developed skin, intestinal, and respiratory reactions while the maize was pollinating. " http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=6278 + MAHARASHTRA GOVT ANNOUNCES AID TO BT COTTON FARMERS The Maharashtra Government has announced special financial assistance to the farmers who had lost their Bt cotton crop due to disease and other reasons in 2005-06 in the state. http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=6263 + BT COTTON SEEDS IN EYE OF POLITICAL STORM At a time when Mahyco Monsanto is in the process of launching the new version of Bt cotton, cotton prices have crashed to Rs 2200-2700 per quintal, against Rs 4,300 to 4,500 per quintal. The issue rocked the State Assembly when members of opposition parties, including the Congress, staged a walkout in the Madhya Pradesh Assembly, alleging heavy losses suffered by farmers due to the low yield from Bt cotton. They also accused the ruling BJP of promoting multi-national companies. Samajwadi Party leaders Suneelam, Govind Singh, and Arif Aqeel of Congress claimed that thousands of farmers in Malwa and Nimar region found that the average yield of cotton had been reduced from 15 quintals to only 4 quintals. Demanding compensation for the affected farmers, the opposition members claimed that Bt cotton had proved to be a failure in terms of cost effectiveness, germination, productivity and quality. http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=6272 + NEW HYPE OUT OF OLD BOTTLES IN INDIA Bt cotton in India has had an appalling press of late, with scores of articles reporting everything from failed germination to disappointing yields, from disease outbreaks to farmer suicides. But then suddenly in the last few days there's been a very different crop of headlines: " India: Biotech cotton enhances farm income " - Fibre2fashion.com, India " Biotech cotton raises farm income by Rs 558 cr " - Economic Times, India " GM crops up farmers' income " - Financial Express, India " Bt cotton helps India increase farm income " - Checkbiotech.org These headlines all relate, as one of these articles notes, to " a study by UK-based PG Economics " which " claimed that farmers' income has increased by $124.2 million (Rs 558 crore) on cumulative basis in India with the adoption of insect-resistant Bt cotton. " This claim is contradicted by other studies, as Ashok B. Sharma in the Financial Express notes. Sharma also identifies the PG Economics study that is the basis of the current claims about Indian Bt cotton production. It's " GM Crops: The Global Socio-economic and Environmental Impact & The First Nine Years 1996-2004 " . What's interesting about this is that although this report is being used to hype GM crops in India at the moment, it was released back in October 2005. It also appears from the current spate of articles that whoever is hyping this report from last year is failing to point out that it was commissioned by Monsanto! The report proved controversial on publication, as have other pro-GM reports commissioned by the biotech industry from PG Economics. As GM Watch noted at the time, " The science in the new report is somewhat less than impressive. It's not even clear where half of their figures come from. Most of the references are presentations at biotech conferences and unpublished articles and very few appear to have been peer reviewed. Some of the cited papers are from PG Economics Ltd itself (whose biotech reports are mostly funded by the biotech industry), the National Center for Food and Agriculture Policy (described by an article in Science as 'a pro-GM industry group'), ISAAA (industry funded), etc. " http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=6282 + FARMER BODIES OPPOSE INDO-U.S. RESEARCH INITIATIVE The proposed India-US Knowledge Initiative in Agri Research and Education has run into rough weather, with the farmers' organisations of the UPA coalition partners opposing the move. The farmers' organisations have criticised the move as " surrendering the interests of Indian peasants to the multinationals based in US " . They have demanded that the government make the details of the programme public and initiate a debate in both the houses of the Parliament. The farmer bodies are warning that the ruling coalition risks electoral defeat if it continues with its " anti-farmer policies " . The Indo-US pact on ag research and education, farmers' leaders point out, will promote GMOs in India, extend a strong patent regime in Indian agriculture and give the US and its multinationals free access to India's remarkable genetic biodiversity. Both Wal-Mart and Monsanto are represented on the board overseeing the pact. Among those raising concerns is Krishan Bir Chaudhary, the executive chairman of India's leading farmers' organisation, Bharat Krishak Samaj. The BKS is the farming organisation of India's ruling Congress party. http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=6262 http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=6264 " NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency may have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse nor protection save to call for the impeachment of the current President. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.