Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

water

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

As Underground Water Vanishes, Plains Towns Brace for Costly Future

 

February 13, 2006 — By Garance Burke, Associated Press

ULYSSES, Kan. — In recent weeks, this oil-and-gas town of 6,000 has been

looking into buying water -- perhaps $190,000 worth of the stuff.

 

The Ogallala aquifer, the vast underground pool that feeds faucets across the

Great Plains, is running low, forcing farmers and towns to find other sources of

water and pay dearly for it, too.

 

" Out here, water is like gold, " Mayor Ed Wiltse said as he ran his hands over a

chart of the town's faltering wells. " Without it, we perish. "

 

The Ogallala aquifer is the world's largest underground water system, irrigating

one-third of the nation's corn crops and providing drinking water to Colorado,

Kansas, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas and Wyoming. It

contains enough water to cover the entire United States to a depth of 1 1/2

feet.

 

But because of heavy usage, some water experts have pronounced it one of the

fastest-disappearing aquifers in the world.

 

Now, after generations in which water from the Ogallala was treated as if it

were an inexhaustible resource, farmers, cities, states and the federal

government are talking seriously about conservation.

 

In some places across the country, the aquifer is flush with water. Near

Nebraska's Platte River, for instance, streams quickly recharge its underground

channels. But Kansas hydrologists estimate that around Ulysses, the aquifer may

have only 25 years left if current usage continues.

 

Since the 1940s, Ulysses' wells have drawn from the Ogallala aquifer. But

Ulysses sits in a stretch of the Corn Belt where the water table has dropped 25

feet in the past decade. Once-wild rivers have turned to gravel, and streams

stopped running years ago. And after years of drought, it has been a long time

since anyone thought the sky might water the crops.

 

Some farmers in Ulysses and beyond have started switching from corn to cotton,

which needs less water. But for drinking water and water for industry, towns

have little choice but to spend millions to move water from miles away.

 

" We've just gone through a four-year drought, " Wiltse said. " So now we're having

to go further out from the city to purchase water rights. This time, we're not

only paying to buy more water, but we'll be paying for underground water

pipelines and booster pumps. "

 

Similarly, the city of Lubbock, Texas, began buying up new water rights last

year. The municipal water authority will spend $100 million to supply the town

with water for the next century.

 

" This ain't the time to play politics, " said Lubbock City Councilman Gary Boren.

" It's one of those things that if you don't have it, you'll pay any price to get

it. "

 

After nearly a century of state policy that doled out water rights to farmers

almost indiscriminately, Kansas has virtually banned any new uses of water along

the state's western edge. A group of concerned growers in Thomas County, near

the Colorado line, is considering an across-the-board 10 percent reduction in

water use. And last month, Gov. Kathleen Sebelius proposed to pay farmers to

stop watering their crops.

 

" Once that water is used, it's not going to come back, " said hydrologist Brownie

Wilson, who monitors water declines at the University of Kansas in Lawrence.

" Whether it's better to use it now or save it for tomorrow is where you get the

debate. "

 

The federal government is also trying to take action. This year's agriculture

appropriations bill acknowledges the aquifer could go dry within two decades and

calls for federal conservation efforts.

 

" There's an old saying that whiskey's for drinking and water's for fighting, "

said Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan. " Water is the lifeblood of this region. There's

no question that it is our biggest policy question. "

 

However, the National Corn Growers Association and the American Farm Bureau

oppose federal regulation of groundwater, arguing that water rights are a state

issue.

 

Source: Associated Press

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...