Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

them thar trees was prolly terrorist sympathizers anyways...

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Lands Could Reopen to Logging

 

November 08, 2005 — By Michael Milstein, The Oregonian

A deal between the Bush administration and timber industry probably will restart

chain saws across millions of acres of Western Oregon in the next few years,

including reserves set aside for the northern spotted owl and other wildlife.

 

It will mark perhaps the single largest and most striking shift in public land

management in the Northwest since the Clinton administration's 1994 Northwest

Forest Plan created those reserves in the first place.

 

Conservationists fear it will begin the permanent unraveling of those reserves,

a key piece of the strategy to sustain the spotted owl, marbled murrelet and

salmon.

 

But it gives the Bush administration one of its best chances to deliver on its

goal of boosting Northwest logging. It comes at an opportune time for Oregon

counties, too, because federal funding they received in place of declining

timber revenue is about to expire.

 

The federal deficit and costs of the Iraq war and hurricane recovery make

renewal of the funding more iffy and logging revenue more sought-after.

 

The sea change will come through a new federal blueprint for management of 2.5

million acres of Western Oregon, much of it lush forest in a checkerboard

pattern between Interstate 5 and the ocean. The U.S. Bureau of Land Management

has begun asking for public input as it drafts the new plan for release in 2008.

 

BLM State Director Elaine Brong said the revision will be completed openly with

local involvement. It will consider new strategies for spreading logging over

wider areas to lessen its impact, she said.

 

" If we're going to come up with the right answer, it's got to be done here, " she

said.

 

But the revision itself was a key part of a 2003 legal settlement between the

timber industry and Bush administration. The deal points BLM toward doing away

with reserves set aside to promote older forest and the wildlife that uses it.

 

A clause in the deal hints at how sharply things may change. It directs BLM to

abide by a 1990 court ruling that said timber production should be the " dominant

use " of the lands -- and a higher priority than wildlife habitat and old-growth

forest.

 

" The timber industry is really the top consideration, obviously, " said Francis

Eatherington of the environmental group Umpqua Watersheds.

 

Special class of land

 

Most of the land involved, an area larger than most national forests, falls into

a special class of acreage known as O & C lands. They get their name from an 1866

giveaway of federal land known as the Oregon and California Railroad land grant.

 

The idea was that the railroad company would sell the land to finance

construction of a north-south railroad between the states.

 

But when the Southern Pacific Railroad held on to the land instead of selling

it, the government grew frustrated and took back much of the acreage. It no

longer was conventional public land, though. Congress gave it special direction

more pointed than " multiple-use " acreage such as national forests, where the

government must balance environmental and commercial demands.

 

Congress said the O & C lands would be managed for " permanent forest production, "

with trees logged at a sustainable rate " for the purpose of providing a

permanent source of timber supply, protecting watersheds, regulating stream flow

and contributing to the economic stability of local communities and industries,

and providing recreational facilities. "

 

The BLM sold up to 1.6 billion board feet of timber a year -- enough to fill

more than 300,000 log trucks. Half the revenue goes to the county where the

timber is sold, while the other half is split between the federal treasury and

the BLM.

 

The county share has made the most timber-rich counties advocates of logging on

the O & C lands, often through a group called the Association of O & C Counties.

 

When environmental activists went to court to scale back logging, the O & C

counties joined in to defend the government's approach. An appeals court ruled

that there is no room to reserve any areas from logging to provide wildlife

habitat.

 

Congress never intended " that wildlife habitat conservation or conservation of

old growth forest is a goal on a par with timber production, or indeed that it

is a goal of the O & C Act at all, " the court concluded.

 

But the 1994 Northwest Forest Plan, crafted by the Clinton administration to

save the spotted owl while allowing some continued logging, outlined a network

of reserves across 24.5 million acres of the Northwest -- including the O & C

lands. The trouble is that the plan has never delivered the timber it projected,

and logging on O & C lands has fallen roughly 90 percent since the late 1980s.

 

About four of every five dollars dedicated to timber work is spent on

administrative procedures and legal battles, Brong said, and Congress is

frustrated with the lack of action.

 

" There's very little action on the ground where we can show progress, even for

conservation, " she said.

 

" What's currently going on is not very good because there's no management going

on, " said Doug Robertson, a county commissioner in Douglas County, the largest

recipient of O & C timber money. Current cutting levels of about 135 million board

feet a year are " just ridiculous, " he said.

 

Because logging fell so sharply, Congress stepped in with funding for counties

left short of money. But that expires in 2007, and counties are pushing for an

extension against the odds of a deficit swollen by war and hurricane costs.

 

After President Bush took office with a tone friendlier to the timber industry,

the industry group American Forest Resource Council sued the administration,

saying the O & C lands should not be included in the reserves.

 

In a settlement with industry and the counties, the Bush administration promised

to have the BLM revise the management plan for the O & C lands. The BLM must

consider at least one option that does away with all wildlife reserves.

 

But the settlement also requires the BLM to follow the court rulings that

concluded reserves have no place on O & C lands. That makes it likely that the BLM

will get rid of the reserves, freeing up the land for logging.

 

" That's clearly the way it's going to need to go, " said Robertson, a Republican.

 

He said logging of 1 billion board feet has proved sustainable in the past, and

though cutting may not return to that level, it could be much higher than it is

now. It would let managers better address problems such as crowded forests

vulnerable to wildfire.

 

BLM officials emphasize that their decision must comply with other federal laws

such as the Endangered Species Act, which protects the spotted owl and other

species. They said they will examine strategies such as the one used for the

Tillamook State Forest, which attempts to use logging to sculpt diverse forests

across the landscape.

 

That approach, though, has had its own problems. It has faced intense criticism

by conservationists and has not produced as much timber as coastal counties

wanted.

 

Some county leaders say the logging push may go too far on O & C lands. Pete

Sorenson, a Lane County commissioner and Democratic candidate for governor, said

the timber industry is behind the activities of the Association of O & C Counties.

He said the BLM may also be under pressure by the Bush administration to boost

logging.

 

" What we have going on here is a struggle between those counties focused on

trying to keep the cut up versus the knowledge that abusing the lands is

fundamentally the wrong way to go, " he said.

 

To see more of The Oregonian, or to the newspaper, go to

http://www.oregonian.com.

 

Source: Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News

 

 

External control are you gonna let them get you?

Do you wanna be a prisoner in the boundaries they set you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...