Guest guest Posted October 20, 2005 Report Share Posted October 20, 2005 Through a politics of fear, we are being frightened into abandoning our liberties in the name of protection from terrorist attack. In reality these anti-terror measures make us less secure, bringing us closer to a police state. Now more than ever, everyone is needed to demonstrate their opposition. " - Campaign Against Criminalising Communities " It's time to stand up for everyone's freedom to leaflet, picket, assemble and march against injustice and oppression. Such rights and freedoms have not been handed down by the powers-that-be, but won through struggles over the last 100 years or more. " - Freedom To Protest Conference (see below). Last week 600 people were stopped and searched in Brighton under Section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000, during the Labour Party Conference in Brighton. According to the Home Office, " Stop and search under Section 44 is an important tool in the on-going fight against terrorism " and that the use of the powers was " intelligence-led and based on an assessment of the threat against the UK. " But with 600 searches and no terrorists arrested, SchNEWS reckon that's a pretty poor level of intelligence. So for four days we got a taste of what black and Muslim communities have been experiencing for years. The widespread use of the Terrorism Act to stifle dissent has only come to media attention thanks to the silencing of 82 year old Walter Wolfgang during Jack Straw's speech at the party conference. Wolfgang's unprompted ad-lib ruined the Neo-Labour choreographed political theatre production. So he was thrown out and then detained for a search under Section 44 to stop him getting back in. Sussex Police apologised to him of course - but only because they were getting grief for it in the Daily Mail. The other 599 searched can get stuffed. What the public got was a glimpse of something that SchNEWS has been banging on about for years. Without hammering home the obvious, Section 44 has nothing to do with stopping terrorism, it's just another tool the cops can use to push people back into line - people who have the wrong ideas about democracy or who live in a community under suspicion. But it's not like the Terrorism Act is the only thing that police have been using to batter anyone who protests over the past few years. From Anti-Social Behaviour Orders to the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act, the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 etc etc. New laws have been enacted and old laws dusted off and reviewed to snuff out dissent. Any gathering of two or more people can be made subject to police control under a recent (2003) modification of the 1981 Public Order Act - and still they want more. Laws are coming in that will not just hinder free movement and assembly but will firmly infringe on freedom of speech. The government proposes to make the 'glorification of terrorism' - (whatever that means) a criminal offence. That has serious implications for anyone writing about why our society finds itself at war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.