Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Meteor shower..don't forget to wah behind yer ears

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Surprise Meteor Shower Possible in June

 

By Joe Rao

SPACE.com's Night Sky Columnist, SPACE.com

 

Meteor enthusiasts will likely be out in force in the coming nights,

hoping to catch a glimpse of an on-again, off-again meteor display.

Special emphasis will be placed on two specific nights: June 22-23

and June 26-27.

 

Ironically, the month of June is usually not noteworthy for any

major meteor showers.

 

Yet six years ago, during the final weekend of June 1998, sky

watchers worldwide were caught off guard by an unexpected shower of

bright meteors and fireballs.

 

From Japan, for instance, came reports of meteors that were visible

even through heavily overcast skies. Reports from visual observers

in other regions suggested that this surprise meteor display

produced meteor rates of anywhere from 50 to 100 per hour and lasted

more than half a day.

 

Similar bursts of June meteor activity were noted many decades ago,

in 1916, 1921 and again in 1927. Because the meteors seemed to fan-

out from a region of the sky near the northern border of the

constellation of Bootes, the Herdsman, they became popularly known

as the "June Bootids."

 

It was also in 1916 that the legendary British meteor observer,

William Denning, first suggested that these meteors were bits and

pieces shed by the Comet Pons-Winnecke, a rather small, dim object

and a member of the Jupiter family of comets. Such comets are so-

named because they have their aphelia the point in their elongated

orbits that place them farthest from the Sun at roughly the same

distance of the planet Jupiter.

 

The orbits of the Earth and the comet were relatively close to each

other during the early 20th Century.

 

In fact, Pons-Winnecke's closest point to the Sun its perihelion

slowly shifted from just inside the Earth's orbit in 1916 to just

outside it during 1921 and 1927. Astronomers assumed that it was

this close proximity between the two orbits that accounted for the

enhanced meteor activity seen in those three years.

 

But since then, due to a series of relatively close encounters with

Jupiter's powerful gravitational field, the orbit of the comet has

significantly changed.

 

Since 1921, the gap between the orbits of the Earth and the comet

has been gradually increasing, becoming more than 22 million miles

(35 million kilometers) by 1998. Because of this large gulf between

the two orbits, it seemed logical to believe that any future

enhanced meteor activity from Comet Pons-Winnecke would be all but

impossible. That argument certainly held up until June 1998. How

then, could that meteor shower have taken place with the two orbits

so widely spaced?

 

The answer came from astronomers David Asher of Armagh Observatory

in Ireland and Vacheslav Emel'yanenko, of South Ural University,

Chelyabinsk, Russia. Their studies showed that the 1998 meteors were

the result of meteoroids released from Comet Pons-Winnecke back in

the year 1825.

 

Asher and Emel'yanenko pointed out that the planet Jupiter completes

one orbit around the Sun in the same time that it takes the

meteoroids shed from Comet Pons-Winnecke to complete two. In other

words, while Jupiter takes 12 years to go around the Sun, the

meteoroids from Pons-Winnecke take 6 years; a 2 to 1 ratio. So

instead of spreading around the whole orbit, the meteoroids were

kept clustered closely together by Jupiter's gravitation.

 

Computer simulations by Asher and Emel'yanenko also demonstrated

that the comet and its ejected particles from 1825 were apparently

disturbed by Jupiter in different ways, so that in the ensuing years

the comet and the particles that it shed became widely separated

from each other.

 

Ultimately, however, in June 1998, the meteoroids ended up cutting

right through the Earth's orbit, producing the unexpected bevy of

bright meteors.

 

So if the meteoroids that produced the bright 1998 display are still

basically moving around the Sun in a 6-year orbit, does that mean

that we'll be in for a repeat performance in 2004? Viewpoints are

mixed.

 

Jrgen Rendtel, president of the International Meteor Organization,

believes that 2004 could be another good year to look for the June

Bootids.

 

Rendtel points out that on Sunday, June 27 at 01h GMT (which

corresponds to Saturday, June 26 at 9:00 p.m. EDT) the Earth should

be passing through essentially the very same region of the meteoroid

stream as in 1998.

That time would be the middle of the peak activity seen in 1998, but

since that display lasted for many hours, observers worldwide should

stay alert through Saturday night on into Sunday morning for any

unusual or enhanced meteor activity.

 

On the other hand, David Asher's belief is that little or nothing

will be observed, based primarily on the simple argument that

unusual numbers of bright meteors should also have been seen in 1992

and 1986, but nothing apparently occurred.

 

In recent days, a different forecast for the June Bootids has been

issued by Jerimie Vaubaillon of the Institut de Mcanique Cleste et

de Calcul des phmrides, in Paris, France and Russians Sergey

Dubrovsky and Sergey Shanov.

 

Their calculations suggest that the Earth will interact with a swarm

of meteoroids that were ejected by Comet Pons-Winnecke at not just

one, but several of its past visits to the Sun, most notably in

1819, 1825, 1830, 1836 and perhaps 1875. In addition, the predicted

peak for this activity comes several days earlier than Rendtel's

suggestion: Wednesday, June 23 at 11h GMT (7 a.m. EDT).

 

Western North America and the Pacific Ocean will still be in

darkness at that time, and are favored with the best possible views.

But should the activity last for many hours, then it could be

worthwhile to carefully watch the sky from Tuesday night, the 22nd,

on until the first light of dawn on Wednesday, the 23rd.

 

Whether you plan to look for the June Bootids on the night of June

22-23 or again on the night of June 26-27, keep in mind that the

constellation of Bootes will be excellently positioned as darkness

falls. It will appear nearly overhead and high up in the northern

sky and will remain in view through the night as it descends toward

the northwest.

 

Fortunately, the Moon will be a rather wide crescent and will set

just before midnight (local daylight time) on the night of June 22-

23. It will, however, be more of a hindrance on the night of June 26-

27 when it will have increased in brightness to a bright gibbous

phase and not setting until after 1:30 a.m.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Awesome! I have a special spot I always camp out to see meteor

showers (naturally, we can't see them in Vegas). Thanks for the heads

up.

Sara

, EBbrewpunx@c... wrote:

> Surprise Meteor Shower Possible in June

>

> By Joe Rao

> SPACE.com's Night Sky Columnist, SPACE.com

>

> Meteor enthusiasts will likely be out in force in the coming

nights,

> hoping to catch a glimpse of an on-again, off-again meteor display.

> Special emphasis will be placed on two specific nights: June 22-23

> and June 26-27.

>

> Ironically, the month of June is usually not noteworthy for any

> major meteor showers.

>

> Yet six years ago, during the final weekend of June 1998, sky

> watchers worldwide were caught off guard by an unexpected shower of

> bright meteors and fireballs.

>

> From Japan, for instance, came reports of meteors that were visible

> even through heavily overcast skies. Reports from visual observers

> in other regions suggested that this surprise meteor display

> produced meteor rates of anywhere from 50 to 100 per hour and

lasted

> more than half a day.

>

> Similar bursts of June meteor activity were noted many decades ago,

> in 1916, 1921 and again in 1927. Because the meteors seemed to fan-

> out from a region of the sky near the northern border of the

> constellation of Bootes, the Herdsman, they became popularly known

> as the " June Bootids. "

>

> It was also in 1916 that the legendary British meteor observer,

> William Denning, first suggested that these meteors were bits and

> pieces shed by the Comet Pons-Winnecke, a rather small, dim object

> and a member of the Jupiter family of comets. Such comets are so-

> named because they have their aphelia the point in their elongated

> orbits that place them farthest from the Sun at roughly the same

> distance of the planet Jupiter.

>

> The orbits of the Earth and the comet were relatively close to each

> other during the early 20th Century.

>

> In fact, Pons-Winnecke's closest point to the Sun its perihelion

> slowly shifted from just inside the Earth's orbit in 1916 to just

> outside it during 1921 and 1927. Astronomers assumed that it was

> this close proximity between the two orbits that accounted for the

> enhanced meteor activity seen in those three years.

>

> But since then, due to a series of relatively close encounters with

> Jupiter's powerful gravitational field, the orbit of the comet has

> significantly changed.

>

> Since 1921, the gap between the orbits of the Earth and the comet

> has been gradually increasing, becoming more than 22 million miles

> (35 million kilometers) by 1998. Because of this large gulf between

> the two orbits, it seemed logical to believe that any future

> enhanced meteor activity from Comet Pons-Winnecke would be all but

> impossible. That argument certainly held up until June 1998. How

> then, could that meteor shower have taken place with the two orbits

> so widely spaced?

>

> The answer came from astronomers David Asher of Armagh Observatory

> in Ireland and Vacheslav Emel'yanenko, of South Ural University,

> Chelyabinsk, Russia. Their studies showed that the 1998 meteors

were

> the result of meteoroids released from Comet Pons-Winnecke back in

> the year 1825.

>

> Asher and Emel'yanenko pointed out that the planet Jupiter

completes

> one orbit around the Sun in the same time that it takes the

> meteoroids shed from Comet Pons-Winnecke to complete two. In other

> words, while Jupiter takes 12 years to go around the Sun, the

> meteoroids from Pons-Winnecke take 6 years; a 2 to 1 ratio. So

> instead of spreading around the whole orbit, the meteoroids were

> kept clustered closely together by Jupiter's gravitation.

>

> Computer simulations by Asher and Emel'yanenko also demonstrated

> that the comet and its ejected particles from 1825 were apparently

> disturbed by Jupiter in different ways, so that in the ensuing

years

> the comet and the particles that it shed became widely separated

> from each other.

>

> Ultimately, however, in June 1998, the meteoroids ended up cutting

> right through the Earth's orbit, producing the unexpected bevy of

> bright meteors.

>

> So if the meteoroids that produced the bright 1998 display are

still

> basically moving around the Sun in a 6-year orbit, does that mean

> that we'll be in for a repeat performance in 2004? Viewpoints are

> mixed.

>

> Jrgen Rendtel, president of the International Meteor Organization,

> believes that 2004 could be another good year to look for the June

> Bootids.

>

> Rendtel points out that on Sunday, June 27 at 01h GMT (which

> corresponds to Saturday, June 26 at 9:00 p.m. EDT) the Earth should

> be passing through essentially the very same region of the

meteoroid

> stream as in 1998.

> That time would be the middle of the peak activity seen in 1998,

but

> since that display lasted for many hours, observers worldwide

should

> stay alert through Saturday night on into Sunday morning for any

> unusual or enhanced meteor activity.

>

> On the other hand, David Asher's belief is that little or nothing

> will be observed, based primarily on the simple argument that

> unusual numbers of bright meteors should also have been seen in

1992

> and 1986, but nothing apparently occurred.

>

> In recent days, a different forecast for the June Bootids has been

> issued by Jerimie Vaubaillon of the Institut de Mcanique Cleste et

> de Calcul des phmrides, in Paris, France and Russians Sergey

> Dubrovsky and Sergey Shanov.

>

> Their calculations suggest that the Earth will interact with a

swarm

> of meteoroids that were ejected by Comet Pons-Winnecke at not just

> one, but several of its past visits to the Sun, most notably in

> 1819, 1825, 1830, 1836 and perhaps 1875. In addition, the predicted

> peak for this activity comes several days earlier than Rendtel's

> suggestion: Wednesday, June 23 at 11h GMT (7 a.m. EDT).

>

> Western North America and the Pacific Ocean will still be in

> darkness at that time, and are favored with the best possible

views.

> But should the activity last for many hours, then it could be

> worthwhile to carefully watch the sky from Tuesday night, the 22nd,

> on until the first light of dawn on Wednesday, the 23rd.

>

> Whether you plan to look for the June Bootids on the night of June

> 22-23 or again on the night of June 26-27, keep in mind that the

> constellation of Bootes will be excellently positioned as darkness

> falls. It will appear nearly overhead and high up in the northern

> sky and will remain in view through the night as it descends toward

> the northwest.

>

> Fortunately, the Moon will be a rather wide crescent and will set

> just before midnight (local daylight time) on the night of June 22-

> 23. It will, however, be more of a hindrance on the night of June

26-

> 27 when it will have increased in brightness to a bright gibbous

> phase and not setting until after 1:30 a.m.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...