Guest guest Posted March 25, 2004 Report Share Posted March 25, 2004 A ban on two common household pesticides resulted in a striking decline in the number of underweight infants born in areas where the chemicals had been used regularly, found a study by researchers at Columbia University. In 2000, the U.S. EPA banned indoor applications of chlorpyrifos and diazinon, used to control cockroaches and other pests. Babies born to women who had high exposures to the chemicals were an average of 6.6 ounces lighter than babies with mothers who had lower exposures -- comparable to the difference between babies of smoking and non-smoking mothers. Low birth weight is linked to a host of health and developmental problems. The manufacturers of the pesticides originally opposed the ban but later consented to it; the chemicals are still permitted for agricultural use. Said study author Robin M. Whyatt, "There is no question that this is an instance where regulation worked -- that the EPA imposed a ban and there was immediate benefit from it." straight to the source: The Washington Post, Marc Kaufman, 25 Mar 2004 <http://www.gristmagazine.com/cgi-bin/forward.pl?forward_id=2208> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2004 Report Share Posted March 25, 2004 That's quite a difference. And the right action was taken - makes a change. Jo A ban on two common household pesticides resulted in a striking decline in the number of underweight infants born in areas where the chemicals had been used regularly, found a study by researchers at Columbia University. In 2000, the U.S. EPA banned indoor applications of chlorpyrifos and diazinon, used to control cockroaches and other pests. Babies born to women who had high exposures to the chemicals were an average of 6.6 ounces lighter than babies with mothers who had lower exposures -- comparable to the difference between babies of smoking and non-smoking mothers. Low birth weight is linked to a host of health and developmental problems. The manufacturers of the pesticides originally opposed the ban but later consented to it; the chemicals are still permitted for agricultural use. Said study author Robin M. Whyatt, "There is no question that this is an instance where regulation worked -- that the EPA imposed a ban and there was immediate benefit from it." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.