Say NO to Diagnostic Tests!!!

[Guest guest]

Yes, exactly Janet. No one is advocating (in this particular thread) any

form of blindness. In fact, quite the opposite is the case: what you are

saying, what we all are saying, is that when we choose to eat and live in

certain ways, our awareness, both within and without, expand substantially.

We require no tests ... there are NO animals in Nature that require tests in

order to thrive.

 

Heck, a century ago there were almost no tests, as we conceive of them

today.

 

All this reliance upon " test and fix, test and fix " , such as some suggest

below and elsewhere, is about nothing other than fear and about selling

stuff to people who have no earthly idea what they are really buying, or

why. Nobody needs all these tests, nobody needs all these products. Some

people may BELIEVE they need to SELL these tests and products to make a

living or the like. But that is another matter entirely.

 

The so-called " knowing " you gain is far less informative than you think.

Most of the tests are wrong, many are quite destructive, they are ALL normed

on a very sick population, for the most part they provide snapshots and not

any sense of movement (change) or direction. And in the presence of some

test result and diagnosis, you are still left with this choice: Do I treat

whatever symptoms they've " diagnosed " , or do I simply go forward and create

health as best I can? This does not change.

 

Further, for the VERY healthy, there are some specific reasons NOT to get

tested. Why? Because for many tests, the results for the very sick and for

the very healthy can be remarkably similar. For example, the first test for

" AIDS " is a simple blood test. If the white count is too low, then you are a

candidate for another, more comprehensive " AIDS " test. The problem? If you

are VERY healthy, then your white blood cell count will ALSO be very low ...

around the same range as the results that are purported to suggest the

presence of " AIDS " .

 

Given the insanity raging in the courts and whatnot, no very healthy person

in his/her right mind would EVER submit to such tests.

 

And if you DO get tested and you DON'T get such results, then you're not

nearly as healthy as you think you are.

 

Best,

Elchanan

_____

 

Janet FitzGerald [waxplanet]

Friday, October 26, 2007 9:20 AM

rawfood

[Raw Food] Elchanan, Your DENIAL at work (WAS: Re: Erica -- Your

imagination at work ...)

 

Since changing my diet to raw vegan, I have not been eager to go to a doctor

and get tested for that which I already know. I already know that I feel

much better and I am building good health.

 

Janet

 

rawfood@ <rawfood%40> .com,

" mstrong56 " <mstrong@> wrote:

 

What's the big deal? Test, know and adjust as required. To have blind faith

in your theory to the point where you won't test it seems odd.

Why not work off of facts, particularly when they are easily and

inexpensivly knowable?

 

rawfood@ <rawfood%40> .com, " Erica "

<schoolofrawk wrote:

 

Well-put. If someone is truly confident in what the results will be they

would be eager to test. One would think, at least... ;-) Erica