Eager to Test---Why? (WAS: Erica -- Your imagination at work ...)

[Guest guest]

Do you even know all the symptoms of a B12 deficiency? Dr. Graham wouldn't be

able to do what he does if he was deficient.

 

Erica you quote " If someone is truly confident in what the results will be

they would be eager to test. " I find that statement incorrect. I know what my

results would be, but I also know that it wouldn't change the opinions others

have of my lifestyle. I had all my blood tested in the past (came back

perfect), and still have all the same negative gossip going around about my

lifestyle choice.

 

I don't HAVE to prove to anyone that the way I live my life is sufficient and

that it works, and neither should Dr. Graham. He's been living the way he talks

for more years than I dare say anyone in this group, and longer than some have

even been alive. If he had a B12 deficiency, it would have been very evident by

now and the damage done in the length of time that has passed would have been

irreversible.

 

I wish everyone would get back to the topic at hand (raw foods), instead of

attacking an individual who isn't even here to comment on his own behalf. This

is getting ridiculous IMO.

 

~Sarah

 

Erica <schoolofrawk wrote:

rawfood , " mstrong56 " <mstrong wrote:

>

> What's the big deal? Test, know and adjust as required. To have

blind

> faith in your theory to the point where you won't test it seems odd.

> Why not work off of facts, particularly when they are easily and

> inexpensivly knowable?

 

Well-put. If someone is truly confident in what the results will be

they would be eager to test. One would think, at least... ;-) Erica

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sarah