Guest guest Posted September 24, 2007 Report Share Posted September 24, 2007 >then the raw eating you're doing the rest of the time is > still a great accomplishment and will still give you many if not all > the health benefits of 100% raw. Health is a continuum and practicing 50%, 75%, and even 99% raw will not produce the same results as 100%, especially if there is excess fat and animal protein involved in that other percentage. Most chocolate has casein in it, a substance from milk made to use wood glue. It's all about choices. And, if we knowingly make choices that are not optimal, that is certainly a right we all have. Janet rawfood , " Joe Postma " <joepostma wrote: I am going to say this one last time Janet. I DIDN'T ADVOCATE IT. Advocating something means saying you SHOULD eat something. Advocating something means RECOMMENDING you eat something. I didn't do that, ever. If you would read my posts, instead of sensationalizing your own position, and inventing one for me, you would understand that my position is IF YOU DO partake of a " bad " food for whatever reason - i.e., social, emotional, a craving...you know, all the things that REAL people go through daily and HAVE a difficult time with - then the raw eating you're doing the rest of the time is still a great accomplishment and will still give you many if not all the health benefits of 100% raw. And practically, if my mate bought me chocolates for my birthday, I am going to accept the love she gave me and let her see me enjoy them! A few darned chocolates once a year isn't going to hurt you...there's no need to live in fear of that. Look, this place is not for " experts " to debate " gurus " about exact percentages of this or that or whatever. That is SO pointless, and extremely boring and incredibly annoying. Let's instead talk to the new people and give them guidelines and recommendations and support for going raw, realizing that we all went through a transition at some point and were NOT 100% raw right away. That is, of course, if the new people aren't too quickly spirited away by other economic forces. So, let us try, from now on, to see the VAST similarities in our posts, rather than focus on the MINUTE differences and make such a negative deal out of them. Good Day Joe rawfood , " Janet FitzGerald " <waxplanet@> wrote: Joe, This kind of thinking says it's ok to let your kid eat birthday cake and cupcakes at every birthday party. I struggle with that often with my soon to be 4yo, and so do many health conscious parents. Eating less of anything that isn't optimal is always beneficial. So, why advocate eating anything that isn't optimal, especially when it involves death? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.