Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Healthy vs. Unhealthy Flours

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

A resource that has helped me be more knowledgeable about gluten-free whole

grains is this post by Wardeh:

http://gnowfglins.com/2008/04/01/a-grain-primer/

 

I think most of us are seeking a good sense of balance. It is easy, when

you're new to this gluten-free life, to simply be desperate for good-tasting

baked products, and not to realize that you have to be aware that you're

getting plenty of good whole grains just like you do with wheat flour (white

flour vs. whole wheat). It's not necessarily intuitive for all of us which

of these gluten-free flours are better. A reminder or statement about that

topic isn't a bad thing, but neither is a suggestion of a flour source that

doesn't happen to follow the best dietary guidelines but that gets good

results in baking.

 

I'm still learning about all of this a year into the process, so if the

poster of a recipe or if someone with access to the knowledge wants to let

us know how grains used in a particular, posted recipe stack up, I'm all for

that---with the caveat that it's also okay if sometimes the grains involved

are for a treat and aren't nutritional powerhouses. I don't want anyone to

feel like he or she shouldn't post a recipe because it's not super-healthy,

because nearly all of us want an unhealthy treat now and again.

 

One basic thing I've understood so far is that any grain that just has

'starch' in the title or could have 'starch' in the title (potato starch,

tapioca starch, corn starch) tends to be fairly nutritionally void, so that

if one is using such an item in a baked good, it is best to balance it out

with the addition of whole grains like millet, teff, and buckwheat. Is that

correct? Or are there times that millet flour, buckwheat flour, teff flour,

etc., are not as healthy? Are there other basic, easy-to-remember guidelines

that you utilize for gluten-free grains that have been milled into flour? Is

it true, as it would seem from the names, that brown rice flour is more of a

whole-grain flour than white rice flour is?

 

I think most of us know that whole grain products like quinoa and millet are

healthy, as are most actual whole-foods products, but it's when things are

turned into flours that it's a bit more confusing to me.

 

Sally

http://aprovechar.danandsally.com

 

 

--

" The original pact, the real deal, is with [yourself]: Be honest, dig deep,

or don't bother. "

--Abigail Thomas

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Sally Parrott Ashbrook

<sally.parrott wrote:

> One basic thing I've understood so far is that any grain that just has

> 'starch' in the title or could have 'starch' in the title (potato starch,

> tapioca starch, corn starch) tends to be fairly nutritionally void,

 

Yes, they are added for texture, not nutrition. To keep the final

product " light " instead of a brick.

 

> Is

> it true, as it would seem from the names, that brown rice flour is more of a

> whole-grain flour than white rice flour is?

 

Yes, brown rice flour comes from the whole grain rather than the

refined grain like white rice flour. Like the difference between

whole wheat flour and white flour.

 

> I think most of us know that whole grain products like quinoa and millet are

> healthy, as are most actual whole-foods products, but it's when things are

> turned into flours that it's a bit more confusing to me.

 

I mill my flour at home as much as I can, so I know that the whole

grain is in there and it hasn't had a chance to lose its nutritional

value yet. I can't vouch for the milling processes used in any of the

store-bought flours. I have tended to assume that most of the gluten

free flours (not starches) are " whole " grain, but I guess that might

be a dangerous assumption.

 

Pam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sally wrote:

>I don't want anyone to feel like he or she shouldn't post a recipe because it's

not super-healthy,

>because nearly all of us want an unhealthy treat now and again.

 

I agree Sally. This has mostly been a very pleasant list, with everyone being

respectful of eachother's right and freedom to make our own choices from many

options. I like that. It's been a place that mostly actually lives the adage

" There's a place for all God's Children in the choir " .

 

Regarding your question of what's healthy: you're right about whole grains

generally having more nutrition than refined ones. Products labelled as

" starch " are simply that fraction of the original whole. What is actually

" healthier " though, remains a personal matter. Allergies are very individual,

and although whole quinoa or millet is packed with nutrition, when someone

reacts negatively to it, it's not healthy for that person.

 

The white vs brown rice remains an interesting debate.

http://www.rebeccablood.net/domestic/rice.html Brown rice has more of it's

original layers than white, so more of it's original nutrients. ENRICHED white

rice has been sprayed with supplements. Unless the flour mixture says the white

rice is " enriched " , it probably isn't.

 

Even so, we eat both white and brown rice in our house. We're into healthy vegan

gluten free eating for the long-haul; this is not just a temporary " diet " to us,

in which we might be very exclusive. In practicality, we find that white rice

is simply our choice at times; or sometimes, it happens to be all that is

available.

 

Deborah

 

 

 

 

One basic thing I've understood so far is that any grain that just has

'starch' in the title or could have 'starch' in the title (potato starch,

tapioca starch, corn starch) tends to be fairly nutritionally void, so that

if one is using such an item in a baked good, it is best to balance it out

with the addition of whole grains like millet, teff, and buckwheat. Is that

correct? Or are there times that millet flour, buckwheat flour, teff flour,

etc., are not as healthy? Are there other basic, easy-to-remember guidelines

that you utilize for gluten-free grains that have been milled into flour? Is

it true, as it would seem from the names, that brown rice flour is more of a

whole-grain flour than white rice flour is?

 

I think most of us know that whole grain products like quinoa and millet are

healthy, as are most actual whole-foods products, but it's when things are

turned into flours that it's a bit more confusing to me.

 

Sally

.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks--you've answered one of my questions from my last post!!

 

Lauren :)

 

, " Sally Parrott Ashbrook "

<sally.parrott wrote:

>

> A resource that has helped me be more knowledgeable about gluten-free whole

> grains is this post by Wardeh:

> http://gnowfglins.com/2008/04/01/a-grain-primer/

>

> I think most of us are seeking a good sense of balance. It is easy, when

> you're new to this gluten-free life, to simply be desperate for good-tasting

> baked products, and not to realize that you have to be aware that you're

> getting plenty of good whole grains just like you do with wheat flour (white

> flour vs. whole wheat). It's not necessarily intuitive for all of us which

> of these gluten-free flours are better. A reminder or statement about that

> topic isn't a bad thing, but neither is a suggestion of a flour source that

> doesn't happen to follow the best dietary guidelines but that gets good

> results in baking.

>

> I'm still learning about all of this a year into the process, so if the

> poster of a recipe or if someone with access to the knowledge wants to let

> us know how grains used in a particular, posted recipe stack up, I'm all for

> that---with the caveat that it's also okay if sometimes the grains involved

> are for a treat and aren't nutritional powerhouses. I don't want anyone to

> feel like he or she shouldn't post a recipe because it's not super-healthy,

> because nearly all of us want an unhealthy treat now and again.

>

> One basic thing I've understood so far is that any grain that just has

> 'starch' in the title or could have 'starch' in the title (potato starch,

> tapioca starch, corn starch) tends to be fairly nutritionally void, so that

> if one is using such an item in a baked good, it is best to balance it out

> with the addition of whole grains like millet, teff, and buckwheat. Is that

> correct? Or are there times that millet flour, buckwheat flour, teff flour,

> etc., are not as healthy? Are there other basic, easy-to-remember guidelines

> that you utilize for gluten-free grains that have been milled into flour? Is

> it true, as it would seem from the names, that brown rice flour is more of a

> whole-grain flour than white rice flour is?

>

> I think most of us know that whole grain products like quinoa and millet are

> healthy, as are most actual whole-foods products, but it's when things are

> turned into flours that it's a bit more confusing to me.

>

> Sally

> http://aprovechar.danandsally.com

>

>

> --

> " The original pact, the real deal, is with [yourself]: Be honest, dig deep,

> or don't bother. "

> --Abigail Thomas

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing they enrich is vitamin B, and according to your link,

iron. All of the other vitamins, minerals, protein, and fats, you

lose out on, even with enriched rice. You also have to watch our,

because sometimes those vitamins are wheat-derived.

 

I'm not saying to never eat white rice. Just don't kid yourself that

it has been enriched to contain all the nutrients it started with.

 

Pam

 

On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Deborah Pageau <dpageau wrote:

>

> The white vs brown rice remains an interesting debate.

> http://www.rebeccablood.net/domestic/rice.html Brown rice has more of it's

> original layers than white, so more of it's original nutrients. ENRICHED

> white rice has been sprayed with supplements. Unless the flour mixture says

> the white rice is " enriched " , it probably isn't.

>

> Even so, we eat both white and brown rice in our house. We're into healthy

> vegan gluten free eating for the long-haul; this is not just a temporary

> " diet " to us, in which we might be very exclusive. In practicality, we find

> that white rice is simply our choice at times; or sometimes, it happens to

> be all that is available.

>

> Deborah

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...