Guest guest Posted October 13, 2008 Report Share Posted October 13, 2008 413 - World-Wide Tree News --Today for you 28 news articles about earth's trees! (413th edition) --Audio and Video version of Earth's Tree News: http://forestpolicyresearch.org --To Subscribe / to the world-wide email format send a blank email to: earthtreenews- OR earthtreenews- In this issue: Not so site-specific news related to the world's trees Index: --World-wide: 1) Forests Dialogue's Initiative, 2) Forests Dialogue's Initiative cont., 3) EU Emissions Trading Scheme will include forest issues, 4) IUCN's World Conservation Congress, 5) Black Globalization, 6) Annual cost of forest loss between $2 trillion and $5 trillion, 7) Mangroves are our " rainforests by the sea, " 8) International Union for Conservation of Nature on " Red list, " 9) Value of Deadwood, 10) A cancer within the environmental movement, 11) " Life as Commerce " features case studies, 12) We must face twin menace of climate change and the degradation of ecosystems, 13) Most detailed assessment ever of worldwide conservation status in national parks and reserves, 14) What's " conflict timber? " 15) Only treaty that governs forest products is Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, 16) Indigenous leaders unite! 17) RAN starts to regain credibility, 18) RAN credibility cont. 19) First-ever globally relevant sustainable tourism criteria, 20) Wanna buy carbon credits to assuage your guilt? 21) New Yorker: Stolen Forests, 22) State of the world's mammals, 23) RAN history, 24) Fragmentation is bad for many reasons, 25) More on World Conservation Congress, 26) Wildlife Conservation Network, 27) A man who has committed a mistake and doesn't correct it is committing another mistake, 28) 500 million hectares of plantations required for biomass power, Articles: World-wide: 1) The Forests Dialogue's Initiative on Forests and Climate Change brought together more than 250 representatives of governments, forestry companies, trade unions, environmental and social groups, international organizations, forest owners, indigenous peoples and forest-community groups in a series of meetings over 10 months. For the first time, the group has agreed on five guiding principles for climate change negotiators. In a landmark statement entitled Beyond REDD: The Role of Forests in Climate Change, the Initiative also agreed on exactly what role forests can play in the battle to halt damaging climate change. The group specifies that sustainable forest management that reduces deforestation and degradation and that actively supports the livelihoods of millions of forest-dependent communities must now be one of the world's highest priorities. This is because forests and forest products have the unique ability to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, capture carbon, and lessen peoples' vulnerability to climate change. " For the first time on this unprecented scale, forest leaders, business representatives, donors, and community groups not only agreed on the pivotal role that forests can play in mitigating climate change but also mapped out a consensus action plan on concrete next steps. We now ask the world to work with us in putting these guiding principles into action, " says Stewart Maginnis, Head of the Forest Conservation Programme at IUCN, the International Union for Conservation of Nature. http://www.waltainfo.com/walnew/index.php?option=com_content & task=view & id=3510 & I\ temid=48 2) The Forests Dialogue — a coalition consisting of more than 250 representatives of governments, forestry companies, trade unions, environmental and social groups, international organizations, forest owners, indigenous peoples and forest-community groups — has issued guiding principles for including forests in climate change negotiations. The initiative also released a statement calling for sustainable forest management that reduces deforestation, helps fight climate change, and supports rural livelihoods to be made a global priority. " For the first time on this unprecedented scale, forest leaders, business representatives, donors, and community groups not only agreed on the pivotal role that forests can play in mitigating climate change but also mapped out a consensus action plan on concrete next steps. We now ask the world to work with us in putting these guiding principles into action, " said Stewart Maginnis, Head of IUCN's Forest Conservation Program. The statement and the guiding principles appear below. - Beyond REDD: The Role of Forests in Climate Change, A Statement from The Forests Dialogue - 1. Ensure that forest-related climate change options support sustainable development in both forest-rich and forest-poor countries. 2. Tackle the drivers of deforestation that lie outside the forests sector. 3. Support transparent, inclusive, and accountable forest governance. 4. Encourage local processes to clarify and strengthen tenure, property, and carbon rights. 5. Provide substantial additional funding to build the capacity to put the above principles into practice. CONCLUSION: Those who met under the auspices of The Forests Dialogue on Climate Change understand that although individuals, communities, and nations have made widely divergent contributions to the increasing concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, solving the problem will require a unified global response. Equally, while solutions to climate change must respect national sovereignty and contribute to national development, they must also respect human rights. http://news.mongabay.com/2008/1008-forest_dialog.html 3) " Consensus on forests is rare. When it is achieved, the world should listen. When it offers a solution to climate change, the world must listen, " stressed the group. Stewart Maginnis, head of the Forest Conservation Programme at the International Union for Conservation of Nature, agreed: " For the first time on this unprecedented scale, forest leaders, business representatives, donors and community groups not only agreed on the pivotal role that forests can play in mitigating climate change but also mapped out a consensus action plan on concrete next steps. We now ask the world to work with us. " Delegates from the world over have been exploring mechanisms to reward those that curb deforestation, especially in developing countries. But environmentalists have warned that without the right safeguards, such proposals could backfire. In particular, NGOs are opposed to including forests in carbon emissions trading schemes, saying this was a mere ploy to avoid real carbon emissions reductions at home. But members of the European Parliament's environment committee (ENVI) this week voted to include the issue forests in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (see EurActiv Links Dossier), saying countries should be allowed to offset up to 5% of their total emission reduction commitments in exchange for preserving forests in developing countries. The Commission had originally left forests out of its climate package, arguing that it was too difficult to measure emissions from this sector with accuracy. http://www.euractiv.com/en/climate-change/landmark-consensus-forests-pivotal-cli\ mate-role/article-176247 4) Marton-Lefèvre was addressing more than 8,000 specialists from the conservation community, governments, nongovernmental organizations, academia, private sector, women and indigenous groups who have gathered in Barcelona for the IUCN's World Conservation Congress, held once every four years. " In the last four days the call to protect the planet has been heard from both government leaders and the NGO community, " says Valli Moosa, president of IUCN. " Environmental concerns are now at the top of the decision-makers priority list. " While the world is entangled in the turmoil of a financial crisis, at the World Conservation Congress civil society, environmentalists, governments and business have been defining a different way forward. The 10 day conference opened Sunday and even during these difficult financial times, it has been the occasion of announcements of substantial investments in conservation funding. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation is committing $50 million to help conservation groups working in eight biodiversity hotspots preserve biodiversity in the face of climate change. The eight places all have high concentrations of species, many of which are found nowhere else and all are under extreme threat. They include the Lower Mekong, Eastern Himalayas, and Melanesia in Asia and the Pacific; Madagascar and the Albertine Rift in Africa; and the Insular Caribbean and southern and northern Andes in Latin America. " The scale and urgency of the climate change problem demands that the international conservation community step up its efforts, " said MacArthur President Jonathan Fanton told conference participants in Barcelona. " It is clear that for conservation to succeed in the face of climate change there must be shared science, coordinated action, and the capacity for rapid response, backed up with increased financial resources. " The $33 million Mohamed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund was announced Thursday. It was established by Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, who " hopes to make a genuine contribution to species conservation worldwide " when the fund's operations commence by January 2009. http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/oct2008/2008-10-10-01.asp 5) Black globalization is an evocative name for how multi-nationals and mafias can blur together by using violence and global trade to avoid regulation, certification, and quality control. In the New Yorker article The Stolen Forests Raffi Khatchadourian writes about the global trade in illegally logged timber, and how an environmental NGO, the environment investigation agency, collects data to document illegal logging and encourage law enforcement. " Chances are good that if an item sold in the United States was recently made in China using oak or ash, the wood was imported from Russia through Suifenhe. Because as much as half of the hardwood from Primorski Krai is harvested in violation of Russian law—either by large companies working with corrupt provincial officials or by gangs of men in remote villages—it is likely that any given piece of wood in the city has been logged illegally. This wide-scale theft empowers mafias, robs the Russian government of revenue, and assists in the destruction of one of the most precious ecosystems in the Northern Hemisphere. Lawmakers in the province have called for " emergency measures " to stem the flow of illegal wood, and Russia's Minister of Natural Resources has said that in the region " there has emerged an entire criminal branch connected with the preparation, storage, transportation, and selling of stolen timber. " http://rs.resalliance.org/2008/10/10/722/ 6) The study, headed by a Deutsche Bank economist, parallels the Stern Review into the economics of climate change. It has been discussed during many sessions here at the World Conservation Congress. It puts the annual cost of forest loss at between $2 trillion and $5 trillion. The figure comes from adding the value of the various services that forests perform, such as providing clean water and absorbing carbon dioxide. Some conservationists see it as a new way of persuading policymakers to fund nature protection rather than allowing the decline in ecosystems and species, highlighted in the release on Monday of the Red List of Threatened Species, to continue. Speaking to BBC News on the fringes of the congress, study leader Pavan Sukhdev emphasised that the cost of natural decline dwarfs losses on the financial markets. " It's not only greater but it's also continuous, it's been happening every year, year after year, " he told BBC News. " So whereas Wall Street by various calculations has to date lost, within the financial sector, $1-$1.5 trillion, the reality is that at today's rate we are losing natural capital at least between $2-$5 trillion every year. " The review that Mr Sukhdev leads, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (Teeb), was initiated by Germany under its recent EU presidency, with the European Commission providing funding. The first phase concluded in May when the team released its finding that forest decline could be costing about 7% of global GDP. The second phase will expand the scope to other natural systems. Key to understanding his conclusions is that as forests decline, nature stops providing services which it used to provide essentially for free. So the human economy either has to provide them instead, perhaps through building reservoirs, building facilities to sequester carbon dioxide, or farming foods that were once naturally available. Or we have to do without them; either way, there is a financial cost. The Teeb calculations show that the cost falls disproportionately on the poor, because a greater part of their livelihood depends directly on the forest, especially in tropical regions. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7662565.stm 7) Mangroves can be described as 'rainforests by the sea'. Large stretches of the sub-tropical and tropical coastlines of Asia, Africa, Oceania, the Americas and the Caribbean are fringed by mangroves, once estimated to cover an area of over 32 million hectares. Now, less than 15 million hectares remain —less than half the original area. The depletion of the world's mangroves is due to excessive shrimp farms, tourist complexes and intense land development. According to the latest study by the UN's Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the current rate of mangrove loss is around 1% per annum—or around 150,000 ha of new mangrove area loss per year. Now, the Mangrove Action Project (MAP) is working with other organizations in the global South towards restoring degraded and cleared mangrove areas as a high priority. MAP is especially interested in restoring some of the 250,000 ha of abandoned shrimp farms located in former coastal wetland areas, especially in Asia and Latin America. But, even more importantly, MAP is working to help conserve and protect existing mangrove wetlands around the world. http://blog.adreamforabetterworld.com/2008/10/10/the-rapid-depletion-of-the-worl\ d%E2%80%99s-mangrove-forests/ 8) " We are really in trouble, " Julia Marton-Lefevre, head of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), told Reuters on Wednesday after an IUCN " Red List " this week showed that a quarter of all mammals were threatened with extinction. " The amount of loss we have been able to measure ... is really pretty frightening, " she said during an Oct 5-14 IUCN congress, held once every four years, during which 8,000 delegates are looking for better ways to safeguard the planet. The IUCN groups governments, conservation organizations and scientists. " People really get it that we have less water, that the water we have is not usable, that we have fewer places to breathe. People are noticing that the environment we have been taking for granted all of a sudden is not really there or there in a smaller way, " Marton-Lefevre said. She said the Barcelona congress showed conservation was " no longer a sideshow. " The meeting is drawing government ministers, leaders of businesses such as oil group Shell and miner Rio Tinto, and indigenous peoples from the Amazon. The mood was " there's enough conviction now that there is a problem and we do have some solutions so let's get on with it, " she said. But economic arguments about the essential role of biodiversity -- for uses such as food, pharmaceuticals or building materials -- had not yet sunk in fully. " Maybe the economic message hasn't yet been made clear to people. Once they start counting, I think they'll see it pretty clearly, " she said. A report submitted to a U.N. biodiversity conference in May said mankind was causing 50 billion euros ($68 billion) of damage to the planet's land areas every year, with factors including pollution and deforestation. High food prices highlighted the effect of loss of biodiversity, it said. The cumulative loss could amount to at least 7 percent of annual consumption by 2050, it said. That meant conservation was a huge long-term challenge even if financial turmoil was now overshadowing threats to nature. Marton-Lefevre said conservation was increasingly trying to " join the dots. It's not just the one species that you are in love with that the world is losing, but 'what does this mean?'. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Earth/Economics_seen_bolstering_case_to_prote\ ct_nature/articleshow/3576338.cms 9) Traditionally woodland was kept " clean " by clearing away fallen timber. However, nowadays it is recognised that deadwood has an important part to play in forest management. Deadwood was removed to prevent the transfer of disease and pests – a mistaken belief as it happens, for almost all species which inhabit deadwood are specific to that habitat ( " saproxylic " ) and will not inhabit living wood. Now deadwood is recognised as an essential part of the forest ecosystem. While your first image of deadwood might be a fallen tree, there are in fact many types of " deadwood " . Lying thinnings can provide a useful " carpet " for fungus, and dead branches on living trees can make roosts for birds. Crevices and rot holes created by damage to the tree give shelter to a whole host of invertebrates which in turn are food for birds. " Snags " or standing dead trees can provide stable, long term habitats. Native pines, for instance, can take up to 80 years to rot and give a home to a whole host of creatures from the timberman beetle which likes new deadwood, to the crested tit which nests in well-decayed snags and stumps, and capercaillies and ospreys which roost in large dead branches. Birchwood, on the other hand, rots from the inside out creating a hollow tube which is ideal for roosting bats and nesting sites for woodpeckers. It is not just within woodlands that deadwood has a part to play. In and at the edge of watercourses it traps organic matter and facilitates its breakdown into food for aquatic invertebrates. It also provides cover for fish and other creatures dwelling at the edge of the river. It can also alter the water flow, creating pools for instance with natural dams. Deadwood is also a feature of natural bog woodlands. In the south-east of England where woodland has been fairly heavily managed, the great storm of 1987 created a mass of fallen timber which led to a resurgence in many saproxylic species. On the whole, providing there are no safety issues and it is not in an overwhelming quantity, the preference now is to leave standing dead trees and fallen limbs where they are, and to stack cut timber. Even artificial " damage " can be created by careful cutting of crevices with a chainsaw. Further reading is available in the The Forestry Commission's interesting and comprehensive publication, " Life in the Deadwood " http://www.woodlands.co.uk/blog/conservation/deadwood/ 10) MacDonald is convinced -- to paraphrase a Watergate standard -- there is a cancer within the environmental movement. The malignancy can be traced to the alliances between conservation groups and corporations that took root in the 1980s and exploded over the past two decades. CI, The Nature Conservancy, and the World Wildlife Fund all have come to rely on corporations and their foundations. The conservation groups might refer to the corporations as blue-chip companies. Not so, MacDonald. She calls them, " the devils of deforestation. " For my money, there's nothing more delicious than a book that lays bare the rot of a corrupted industry from an insider's perspective. In the hands of a skilled observer, the subject can spring to life. Liar's Poker, Michael Lewis's hilariously disturbing account of Wall Street's investment-banking industry in the late 1980s, comes to mind. Lewis's book traces its lineage to Mark Singer's Funny Money, a masterpiece of nonfiction that exposed the double-dealing and corruption that led to the collapse of the savings and loan industry. Singer's impeccable reporting and lively writing carries the reader to the little Oklahoma bank at the epicenter of the financial catastrophe and plops him down right in the middle of the boardroom. So, it was with a certain amount of anticipation that I picked up Christine MacDonald's book Green, Inc. (Lyons Press, $24.95) a self-described insider's tale of how the environmental movement has been hijacked by self-serving leaders and corporate stooges. The book's press release promised to reveal chapter and verse of mismanagement, malfeasance, and " double lives. " An ambitious goal, no doubt, and I couldn't wait to tear into it. The author immediately sets her sights on the Big Three of the conservation movement: Conservation International, The Nature Conservancy and the U.S. arm of the World Wildlife Fund -- though she doesn't pass up the opportunity to slam the Environmental Defense Fund and its leader, Fred Krupp, along with countless, but unidentified, environmental websites (what she quaintly calls ejournals), and other various and sundry enablers. She carries a special grudge for Peter Seligmann, CI's chair, and his sidekick, CI President Russell Mittermeier, whom she paints as a couple of overcompensated, jet-setting playboys who devote more time to fawning over starlets and corporate chieftains than they do saving the planet. http://www.grist.org/feature/2008/10/03/green.inc/?source=biz 11) " Life as Commerce " features case studies from India, Costa Rica, South Africa, Paraguay and Colombia about the impact of market-based conservation mechanisms like ecotourism, forest certification, biodiversity offsets and carbon trade on Indigenous Peoples, local communities and women. These impacts are particularly important in light of the proposal by some countries to include forest conservation into the global carbon market. At IUCN World Conservation Congress in Barcelona, Global Forest Coalition managing coordinator Simone Lovera said: " The report provides a number of fascinating real-life stories on how these mechanisms work out at the community-level. It forms an important addition to the increasing number of studies that focus on the potential benefits of these mechanisms for local communities and the rules and standards that are needed to generate these benefits. As the case studies describe, such rules and standards seldom exist, and even where they exist, they are not well-implemented as market mechanisms make it attractive for powerful actors to circumvent them. The costs of these mechanisms, also in terms of undermining community governance, seem to outweigh the benefits in real-life situations. " Market-based mechanisms are often seen as solutions to the lack of funding for public conservation, but they are false solutions. The current economic crisis has also shown the unreliability of global markets as a potential funding source for conservation. Wally Menne from the Timberwatch Coalition, who coordinated the case study of South Africa related: " Take for example forest certification. Our case study showed that the Forest Stewardship Council's certification system, as practiced in South Africa, actually seems to be masking many of the environmental, social and economic problems experienced by communities living alongside monoculture timber plantations. The expansion and development of the sector to meet increased global demand for timber products has increased unemployment and functional poverty into the area, and has led to encroachment into land and water resources required for food production and food security. " Emphasizing the importance of food security, a biofuel (agrofuels) review [3] issued this Tuesday in Rome, Italy from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN stated, " food security concerns loom large....Particularly at risk are poor urban consumers and poor net food buyers in rural areas. Many of the world's poor spend more than half of their incomes on food. " The Global Forest Coalition welcomes the FAO's call to review biofuel policies and subsidies in the light of their impact on food security and precious ecosytems like forests. http://www.globalforestcoalition.org/img/userpics/File/publications/LIFE-AS-COMM\ ERCE2008.pdf 12) " We must push our conservation movement to step up to the 21st century challenges, and meet the twin menace of climate change and the degradation of ecosystems, " he said at the opening ceremony. More than 8,000 ministers, UN officials, NGOs, scientists and business chiefs have gathered in the Spanish city of Barcelona to brainstorm for 10 days on how to slow the rate of species extinction and steer the world onto a path of sustainable development. The congress, held every four years, will release an update on Monday of the benchmark " Red List " , deemed the global standard for conservation monitoring. The 2007 edition already shows more than a third of 41,000 species surveyed are facing extinction: a quarter of all mammals, one out of eight birds, one out of three amphibians, and 70 percent of plants. The new biodiversity " bible " -- compiled from the work of 1,800 scientists -- is even grimmer, say researchers who took part in the effort. Conservation work can no longer be confined to the narrow task of saving animals and plants from extinction, Nobel Peace laureate Mohammad Yunus told AFP before addressing the convention. " Conservation of nature cuts across everything -- the sustainability of the planet, of the lives of poor people, and the environmental degradation that is harming nations, " said Yunus, who was awarded the Nobel for helping to spread the practice of microcredit for poor people around the world. With 11,000 volunteer scientists and more than 1,000 paid staff, the IUCN runs thousands of field projects around the globe to monitor and help manage natural environments. http://www.terradaily.com/reports/Conservation_congress_kicks_off_with_dire_warn\ ing_on_biodiversity_999.html 13) Based on input from more than 100 experts, this book aims to provide the most detailed assessment ever of the worldwide distribution and conservation status of national parks and reserves. It examines the relationship between people and protected areas, investigates threats and opportunities, cites the history of protected areas, provides expert conservation advice and celebrates the success of protected areas around the world. With 352 pages, The World's Protected Areas: Status, value and prospects in the 21st Century, which is published in associated with UNEP-WCMC by the University of California Press, contains 110 colour illustrations, 165 line illustrations and 39 colour maps. It is edited by Stuart Chape, Mark Spalding and Martin Jenkins, and includes a foreword by Achim Steiner and Julia Marton-Lefèvre. Available from University of California Press: www.ucpress.edu A copy of the press release is available here http://www.unep-wcmc.org/latenews/index.cfm#st172 14) In 2001, experts with the United Nations in the Democratic Republic of Congo coined a phrase, " conflict timber, " to describe how logging had become interwoven with the fighting there. The term is apt for a number of other places. In Burma, stolen timber helps support the junta and the rebels. In Cambodia, it helped fund the Khmer Rouge, one of the most brutal rebel factions in history. Charles Taylor, the former President of Liberia, distributed logging concessions to warlords and a member of the Ukrainian mafia, and the Oriental Timber Company—known in Liberia as Only Taylor Chops—conducted arms deals on his behalf. The violence tied to Taylor's logging operations reached unprecedented levels, and in 2003 the U.N. Security Council imposed sanctions on all Liberian timber. (China, the largest importer of Liberian timber, tried to block the sanctions.) Shortly afterward, Taylor's regime collapsed. An American official told me that the U.S. intelligence community " absolutely put the fall of Taylor on the timber sanctions. " When von Bismarck discusses this type of violence, there is emotion in his voice. Last December, the body of a Russian banker with close ties to the timber industry was found at the bottom of his swimming pool, near Moscow. A bag had been pulled over his head, and his arms had been tied to his ankles. In a sloppy attempt at a coverup, a suicide note had been left at the scene, prompting a law-enforcement official to say, " He's not Harry Houdini. " I heard of a similar " suicide " not far from Vladivostok earlier this year: an activist working with the World Wildlife Fund was found at a remote hunting cabin, fatally shot, an unconvincing note by his side. This type of violence can be found elsewhere. Earlier this year, in Peru, a community leader who tried to report a shipment of stolen timber was shot to death in a government office. Three years ago, in Brazil, a missionary and community organizer from Ohio, Sister Dorothy Stang, was murdered in the state of Pará, where a third of the Brazilian Amazon's deforestation is occurring and where she had made enemies of loggers. http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/10/06/081006fa_fact_khatchadourian 15) The only treaty that governs the global trade in forest products is the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species—what one American official described to me as a kind of " emergency room " for rare plant and animal species at the threshold of extinction. When von Bismarck was investigating ramin, which is protected by the convention, law-enforcement agents could, in theory, confiscate shipments of goods made from the wood if they did not have the proper permits. (No commercially traded Russian timber has this level of protection.) In practice, the system does not always work very well. Von Bismarck once tipped off the authorities about undocumented ramin headed to a crib company called Baby Trilogy, in Lubbock, Texas. The owners, friends of the Bush family, enlisted the office of Senator John Cornyn, of Texas, to help get the shipment released, and it was. (They say that they did not understand the law, and that this was their last shipment of ramin.) Several years ago, a study found that large volumes of mahogany—the only other commercially significant tree protected by the convention—were entering the United States without permits. During the past several years, von Bismarck and his colleagues have been campaigning for a new way to control timber imports: an amendment to a curious law called the Lacey Act, which, for more than a century, has been a cornerstone of nature protection in America. John F. Lacey, a Civil War veteran and congressman, introduced the legislation in 1900, banning the interstate trade of illegally hunted game. Over time, the Lacey Act was expanded to cover the international trade of wildlife. No one has attempted to calculate what it would cost to restrict all wood products to sustainable forests and plantations. Murray Gell-Mann, the Nobel Prize-winning physicist, once defined sustainability as " living on nature's income rather than its capital. " As a planet, then, if we are consuming the world's forest capital—and deforestation suggests that we are—everything we use that is derived from wood is undervalued. Von Bismarck told me that an economy that structurally undervalues wood is bound to accept illegal timber without much resistance, because the excess black-market supply only reinforces the misconception that wood is cheap and the supply nearly inexhaustible. (According to one estimate, there is enough illicit timber traded worldwide to depress global prices for wood by as much as sixteen per cent.) The notion is reinforced by the murkiness of the timber economy. Very few companies take the trouble to discover where the wood in their products originates. To do so would be expensive, and consumers don't demand it of them. Indifference has become the norm. http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/10/06/081006fa_fact_khatchadourian 16) Indigenous leaders in five Amazonian nations, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Indonesia on Wednesday demanded a larger say on how best to manage tropical forests to fight climate change. More than a billion poor people who depend on forest ecosystems risk economic and cultural devastation if efforts favored by rich nations to reduce greenhouse gases fail to respect their rights and needs, they said at the World Conservation Congress in Barcelona. The clearing of rainforests by developers for mining, slash-and-burn agriculture, cash crops and livestock has all severely reduced the ability of tropical forests to absorb the atmospheric carbon dioxide that drives global warming. Many governments, scientists and green groups favor an international carbon trading scheme that would compensate developing countries for curbing their exploitation of their forests. " Conservationists want to prevent us from using our forest lands for economic purposes, and businesses have government concessions to extract ore, water and biofuel from lands that have been ours for generations, " said Tony James of Guyana, President of the Amerindian Peoples Association. " We have been hearing more and more about the carbon trade, but indigenous people are not being included in the discussions. We want to know: who will own the carbon, and what will be the impact on us? " Native groups should play a key role in crafting any financing scheme for forests that might be included in a broader UN climate change agreement on how to curb greenhouse gases, James said. Without their input, he added, this so-called Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation mechanism, or REDD, would undermine the land rights of forest communities throughout the tropical world. During the Congress, members International Union for the Conservation of Nature, composed of more than 200 governments and 800 NGOs, will vote on whether to recommend that forest communities be granted a decisive role in negotiations. But previous attempts to pass such non-binding declarations have failed, noted Marcus Colchester, of the Forest People's Programme. " As land pressures mount and new rules are developed for mitigating climate change, recognition of the rights of indigenous peoples to 'free, prior and informed consent' is essential, " he said. " But we see more rhetoric than we see real defense of the territories and rights, " he added, pointing out that these principles are set forth in the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Forest leaders at the Congress detailed ways in which their communities were buffeted by both conservation and development forces. http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5glLLMMXXQYkQsFFa6F6aKOTvIlPA 17) One of our top priorities will be to return to working to protect tropical rainforests, as well as reviewing the long history of the old growth campaign and commitments from companies such as Home Depot and Lowe's. Another opportunity for forest protection is on the table at the UN climate negotiations and RAN's team is accredited and ready to go. What else do you think we could do? We welcome your thoughts and input below. Above all, RAN's Old Growth campaign is committed to end logging in ancient forests worldwide. As part of planning this new phase for the campaign, RAN has begun undertaking a strategic review of the Forest Stewardship Council's (FSC's) benefits and costs. The credibility of the FSC continues to be threatened by controversies with specific certifications, with contentious policies such as the Controlled Wood Standard which operates much lower standard into than the FSC itself, and with the volume of wood certified from old growth forests. These controversies affect whether, and how much, RAN can continue supporting the FSC. RAN staff will attend the FSC annual meeting in November, we will report back our conclusions to our members and supporters as well as through dialogue with other NGOs. http://understory.ran.org/2008/10/06/rainforest-action-network%E2%80%99s-old-gro\ wth-campaign-is-entering-a-new-phase/#comment-250674 18) Another of FSC's longest-term NGO supporters, the San Francisco-based Rainforest Action Network has added itself to the list of NGOs expressing serious doubts about the FSC. In a new posting on RAN's website, the organisation's Programme Director, Jennifer Krill, states that the credibility of FSC " continues to be threatened " . Krill specifically identifies the so-called Controlled Wood Standard as being problematic, and hints that RAN might withdraw its support for the organisation. " RAN's Old Growth [forests] campaign is committed to end logging in ancient forests worldwide. As part of planning this new phase for the campaign, RAN has begun undertaking a strategic review of the Forest Stewardship Council's (FSC's) benefits and costs. The credibility of the FSC continues to be threatened by controversies with specific certifications, with contentious policies such as the Controlled Wood Standard which operates much lower standard into than the FSC itself, and with the volume of wood certified from old growth forests. These controversies affect whether, and how much, RAN can continue supporting the FSC. RAN staff will attend the FSC annual meeting in November, we will report back our conclusions to our members and supporters as well as through dialogue with other NGOs. " http://www.fsc-watch.org/archives/2008/10/10/Confidence_in_FSC_co 19) United Nations Foundation Founder and Chairman Ted Turner joined the Rainforest Alliance, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) today to announce the first-ever globally relevant sustainable tourism criteria at the IUCN World Conservation Congress. The new criteria – based on thousands of best practices culled from the existing standards currently in use around the world – were developed to offer a common framework to guide the emerging practice of sustainable tourism and to help businesses, consumers, governments, non-governmental organizations and education institutions to ensure that tourism helps, rather than harms, local communities and the environment. " Sustainability is just like the old business adage: 'you don't encroach on the principal, you live off the interest', " said Turner. " Unfortunately, up to this point, the travel industry and tourists haven't had a common framework to let them know if they're really living up to that maxim. But the Global Sustainable Tourism Criteria (GSTC) will change that. This is a win-win initiative – good for the environment and good for the world's tourism industry. " " Tourism is one of the fastest growing industries and a strong contributor to sustainable development and poverty alleviation, " said Francesco Frangialli, Secretary-General of the United Nations World Tourism Organization. " Over 900 million international tourists travelled last year and UNWTO forecasts 1.6 billion tourists by the year 2020. In order to minimize the negative impacts of this growth, sustainability should translate from words to facts, and be an imperative for all tourism stakeholders. The GSTC initiative will undoubtedly constitute a major reference point for the entire tourism sector and an important step in making sustainability an inherent part of tourism development. " http://www.traveldailynews.com/pages/show_page/27324 20) " I was feeling really guilty because I was basically traveling to three continents in the last month: 'I've spent basically six days on an airplane. I've got to fix this,' " said Michael Sheets, 27, who lives in the District's Logan Circle neighborhood. So a few days ago, Sheets paid $240 to a Silver Spring-based vendor, Carbonfund.org, choosing its offsets because they were more than $100 cheaper than a comparable package from another offset seller. He got back an e-mail saying that the 52,920 pounds of greenhouse-gas emissions attributable to him for the entire year, including his trips to Trinidad, Thailand and Argentina, had been canceled out. " I feel much better about it, " said Sheets, human resources director for an online-education company in Northern Virginia. " I don't feel as guilty about flying to Vegas tomorrow for the weekend. " On the surface, offsets sound like a simple transaction. Generally, the buyer uses an online tool to calculate the carbon footprint -- the amount of harmful emissions -- of a car, a flight or a year's activities. Then the buyer pays an offset vendor to cancel out that footprint. This is done through projects that stop emissions from occurring or remove pollutants from the air. Some offsets are sold like stocks on the Chicago Climate Exchange. Other groups sell them directly to consumers. One study last year found that offset prices ranged from $1.80 per ton of emissions to $300, with most about $6.10. Watchdog groups say offset vendors sometimes do not deliver what they promise. Some offset projects, such as mass tree plantings aimed at absorbing carbon dioxide, deliver climate benefits that are difficult to measure. In other cases, it is unclear whether offsets funnel money to existing projects or to projects that might have been done anyway. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/05/AR2008100502518.\ html 21) As the New Yorker highlighted in their recent article Stolen Forests, illegal logging is a major problem -- causing deforestation, supporting criminal groups, etc. As my colleague Jacob Scherr highlights, it is also a threat to indigenous communities. And, addressing it is an essential component of efforts to combat global warming pollution from deforestation (shhhh don't tell anyone that secret...) -- which accounts for roughly 20% of global emissions. Illegal logging is a major driver of deforestation in many of the " hot spots " of deforestation around the world. As you can see from this table pulled together by my colleague Ani Youatt (who works on our Latin American BioGems project), illegal logging is a major problem in the countries with the highest estimated rates of deforestation emissions. We don't really know how much of global deforestation emissions are the result solely of illegal logging. In lots of places illegal logging is often the first step in efforts to open up new land for agriculture expansion and subsistence energy use. But given the high amount of illegal logging in the countries with high deforestation rates, I think it is fair to say that a lot of deforestation emissions are from illegal logging. Most of the discussion internationally is focused on providing incentives to reduce emissions from deforestation (as I discussed earlier), but strategies to directly address illegal logging have slipped under the radar (see one example where the " Nobel Prizers " didn't mention it in their discussion on deforestation). This is an issue that needs to be brought into the debate. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that we should no longer focus on providing incentives for reducing deforestation (this is a central strategy), but I'm suggesting pulling out another tool in our " toolkit " to address deforestation emissions. http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/jschmidt/illegal_blogging_and_climate_change.h\ tml 22) Schipper and more than 1,700 scientific colleagues spent the past five years surveying the state of the world's mammals. The results, published in Science to coincide with IUCN's conference on biodiversity this week, reveal that 1,139 mammals around the globe are threatened with extinction and the populations of 52 percent of all mammal species are declining. South and Southeast Asia are home to the most threatened mammals, from monkeys to rare rats. And many mammals in the species-rich tropical Andes Mountains of South America, Africa's Cameroonian highlands and Albertine Rift as well as the northern Atlantic and Pacific Oceans are also in trouble. Deforestation, along with hunting or gathering food are the prime causes of the rapid declines in land mammals, such as elephants in Asia; most endangered marine mammals, like the vaquita in Mexico's Gulf of California, are killed by fishing nets, ship strikes or pollution. " Overall conservation status of mammals will likely deteriorate further unless appropriate conservation actions are put in place, " the researchers warn in the report. But the news isn't all grim: Some mammals, such as the black-footed ferret of western North America and the Hainan black-crested gibbon (found only on China's Hainan Island), have been able to rebound as the result of conservation efforts. " These are the kinds of success stories that we need to clasp onto and find out what worked, " Schipper says. " Usually, it takes a lot of money. " But he cautions that any conservation success is likely temporary unless the root problems of, for example, deforestation are addressed. In the case of the Hainan gibbon, for instance, " there's not enough room for that species to go back to having a thousand individuals unless we stop deforestation and hunting, " Schipper says. There's also the clash between saving animals and curing other environmental ills such as global warming. Vast tracts of tropical rainforest have been replaced by palm oil plantations for food and biofuels, satellite imagery reveals. But addressing climate change could also help lessen this extinction crisis as well; the loss of sea ice as a result of a warming world threatens to make life impossible for those mammals such as the polar bear and harp seal that rely on it to survive. The " general trend is that many more mammal species are rapidly declining than we had suspected, " Schipper says. " Fifty percent of species are declining and 5 percent of species are in an upward recovery—that's just not enough. " http://www.sciencemag.org 23) San Francisco-based Rainforest Action Network made headlines when its members, protesting forestry policies, got arrested for blocking shareholders from entering the annual meeting of Weyerhaeuser, one of the world's largest makers of wood products. RAN is known for playing hardball, and thrives on confrontations like this one. Even its home page is hard-core: Above the tagline, " Environmentalism with teeth, " a prowling jaguar seems ready to eat a few hapless CEOs. But it's an extremely effective organization, too, best known for pressuring Home Depot to adopt in 1999 its now famous policy against selling old-growth wood, a move that quickly created a domino effect among many retailers. Now take the Rainforest Alliance, which fills its Web pages with cute little Amazonian frogs and has a policy of working with businesses. " We would never attack a company, " says Jennifer Bass, spokeswoman for the Washington, D.C.-based group. " We decided 20 years ago that it was much more radical to engage businesses. " The group certifies farms and forests and, so far, claims more than 106 million acres of success. Recent coups include quietly bringing Chiquita on board. And Yuban coffee, a Kraft brand, is now made solely from Rainforest Alliance-certified coffee beans. http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticleHomePage & art_aid=9\ 1963 24) Habitat fragmentation occurs when a large expanse of a particular, broadly defined habitat 'type' is reduced to smaller patches that are isolated by surrounding, but different habitats. The surrounding habitat is typically defined a 'matrix', and in the case of forest fragmentation, generally means 'degraded' habitat (fewer native species, urban/rural/agricultural development, etc.). Fragmentation is bad for many reasons: it (1) reduces patch area, (2) increases isolation among populations associated with fragments, and (3) creates 'edges' where unmodified habitat abuts matrix habitat. Each of these has dire implications for species, for we now know that (1) the smaller an area, the fewer individuals and species in can contain, (2) the more isolated a population, the less chance immigrants will 'rescue' it from catastrophes, and (3) edges allow the invasion of alien species, make the microclimate intolerable, increase access to bad humans and lead to cascading ecological events (e.g., fire penetration). Make no mistake, the more fragmented an environment, the worse will be the extinction rates of species therein. What's particularly sad about all this is that fragmentation was actually seen as a potentially GOOD thing by conservation biologists for many long years. The so-called SLOSS (Single Large or Several Small) debate pervaded the early days of conservation literature. The debate was basically the argument that several small reserves would provide more types of habitat juxtapositions and more different species complexes, making overall diversity (species richness) higher, than one large reserve. It was an interesting, if not deluded, intellectual debate because both sides presented some rather clever theoretical and empirical arguments. Part of the attraction of the 'Several Small' idea was that it was generally easier to find series of small habitat fragments to preserve than one giant no-go area. http://conservationbytes.com/2008/10/03/classics-fragmentation/ 25) The world must act quickly if it is to brake an unprecedented die off of the Earth's animal and plant life that could have dire consequences for humans as well, top conservationists warned on Sunday. " There is a clear sense of urgency, " Valli Moosa, president of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and a former environment minister from South Africa, told the opening session of the World Conservation Congress here. " We must push our conservation movement to step up to the 21st century challenges, and meet the twin menace of climate change and the degradation of ecosystems, " he said at the opening ceremony. More than 8,000 ministers, UN officials, NGOs, scientists and business chiefs have gathered in the Spanish city of Barcelona to brainstorm for 10 days on how to slow the rate of species extinction and steer the world onto a path of sustainable development. The congress, held every four years, will release an update on Monday of the benchmark " Red List " , deemed the global standard for conservation monitoring.The 2007 edition already shows more than a third of 41,000 species surveyed are facing extinction: a quarter of all mammals, one out of eight birds, one out of three amphibians, and 70 percent of plants.The new biodiversity " bible " -- compiled from the work of 1,800 scientists -- is even grimmer, say researchers who took part in the effort. Conservation work can no longer be confined to the narrow task of saving animals and plants from extinction, Nobel Peace laureate Mohammad Yunus told AFP before addressing the convention. " Conservation of nature cuts across everything -- the sustainability of the planet, of the lives of poor people, and the environmental degradation that is harming nations, " said Yunus, who was awarded the Nobel for helping to spread the practice of microcredit for poor people around the world. With 11,000 volunteer scientists and more than 1,000 paid staff, the IUCN runs thousands of field projects around the globe to monitor and help manage natural environments. http://www.terradaily.com/reports/Conservation_congress_kicks_off_with_dire_warn\ ing_on_biodiversity_999.html 26) Charlie Knowles, a Stanford grad who built an industrial software company, then sold it in the 1990s, had the rare opportunity to retire in his 30s and ask himself what he wanted to do with the rest of his life. His answer was to apply his business skills to help animals, a passion he developed as a child living in the country and raising pets in Illinois. His grandfather, who was born in Mexico and raised by German nuns, started an international company, Knowles said. His family also lived in England for a year. " We all define our community differently, " said Knowles, 49, of Los Altos Hills. " I've always felt more of a kinship with the world. " Founded in 2001 with conservationist John Lukas and Akiko Yamazaki, wife of CEO Jerry Yang, the Wildlife Conservation Network supports innovative conservation entrepreneurs on nearly all continents who are working on behalf of a variety of exotic animals - elephants and cheetahs in Africa, snow leopards in Central Asia, Andean cats in South America, among others. To qualify for funding, conservationists must live in developing countries, be actively working to save threatened species and integrate the local community into their work. In return, they get office support like marketing and accounting as well as introductions to donors, volunteers and other conservationists. The network also helps teach conservationists how to build nonprofit organizations. " Conservation is needed at all levels, whether it's elephants or avocets here in the Bay Area, " said Elizabeth Murdock, executive director of the Golden Gate Audubon Society. The network has attracted support from some high-profile people over the years - conservationist Jane Goodall, actress Isabella Rossellini, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and model Cindy Crawford all have spoken at fundraising events or worked for the organization. Supporters say the network is efficient - it gives more than 90 percent of contributions to the groups it supports - and the business model is unusual. No group is totally dependent on the network for support. Donors are encouraged to get to know the groups they contribute to and spend time with them in the field if possible. The groups coordinate with local governments to ensure their work gets established and will continue. http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/10/03/BUF0139MGR.DTL 27) Confucius said, " A man who has committed a mistake and doesn't correct it, is committing another mistake. " Clearly deforestation is man's mistake. So how do we correct this mistake? Can we correct this mistake? If deforestation ceased today, it would help immensely, but unfortunately would not be enough. We have lost complete species, both in plant and animal life; however, all is not lost. What we can hope for in bringing deforestation to an end is a new beginning; new species to evolving and the rebirth of this diminishing treasure. With the rapid loss of Earth's rainforests, it's time to correct our mistake. There is no simple solution or quick fix, but there are definitely steps that can be taken to stop the deforestation and restore not only the damaged ecosystems, but the beauty of life that's been lost. Step #1: Education In the last 20 years, deforestation has claimed millions of square miles of tropical rainforests, and to protect their future we need to develop sound educational initiatives. Education programs and curricula for each grade level is vital as children of today are our future. Encouraging good global citizenship in school aged children will help them develop a deeper understanding of conservation challenges, as well as a healthy respect for the environment. Education cannot, however, stop with school-aged kids; adults need the same education about deforestation and preventative measures. Educational resources are now becoming widely available to educators. For example, Paradise Earth Scholastic is Paradise Earth's academic service and the Internet's premier source for rainforest education, replete with educational curricula for first and secondary education, multimedia educational features, and resources for research and teaching. Paradise Earth Scholastic will be available online at www.paradiseearth.com by January 2009. http://about-global-warming.blogspot.com/2008/09/tropical-rainforests-4-ways-to-\ stop.html 28) Scientists who have developed the idea of using biomass power plants with carbon capture and storage in order to reduce atmospheric CO2 levels have made it clear that at least 500 million hectares of plantations would be required, which is over one and a half times the size of India. Replacing all coal burnt today with wood would require far more land and would almost certainly be impossible, although that may go beyond Hansen's proposal. This month's unprecedented plantation forest fires across South Africa [ark] provide a glimpse of a possible future where vast industrial tree plantations combine with global warming: whilst monoculture plantations dry up the land and are prone to fires, climate change fans the flames by exacerbating droughts and heatwaves. This appears to be yet another instance where biofuel proposals are hastily being made that " reshape the Earth's landscape in a significant way " without reference to long-term unintended consequences [ark]. Hansen's proposals would increase the scale of today's monocultures for biofuels 20-25 fold. Small farmers, indigenous peoples and forest communities, who are already suffering most from the impacts of climate change, would undoubtedly be the first to pay the price for 'carbon negative' bioenergy through the loss of their land and livelihoods. Ironically the experience with biofuels should already have taught us that expanding monocultures is one of the quickest ways of making climate change worse. Industrial monocultures [search] (crops and trees) are the main cause of tropical deforestation and emit further vast amounts of greenhouse gases through agro-chemical use and soil erosion. Already, there are 100 million hectares of industrial tree plantations, largely serving the pulp and paper industry, which have replaced natural ecosystems, including old growth forests as well as fertile farmland and pastures. They have decimated biodiversity, depleted groundwater, polluted large areas of land through agrichemical use, and eroded soil and destroyed the livelihoods of large numbers of people. http://www.climateark.org/blog/2008/10/guest_hansens_proposal_to_repl.asp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.