McCain Under Fire Over Environment Record

[Guest guest]

Published on Thursday, March 27, 2008 by The Guardian/UK McCain Under Fire Over Environment Record by Elana SchorJohn McCain¹s reputation as a fighter against climate change has come under fire from some US green activists who charge the Republican nominee with neglecting his commitment to the environment.Twice in the last three months, the US Senate has come within one vote of overturning $1.7bn in tax benefits for oil companies and using the money to promote renewable energy. Both times, McCain has skipped the vote, effectively killing the proposal and alarming leading green groups.McCain also was a no-show during controversial votes on subsidising the conversion

of oil to ³clean² coal and relaxing rules for oil refineries.When the League of Conservation Voters (LCV) released its annual environmental rankings last month, McCain - whose campaign website declares him ³a leader on the issue of global warming² - earned a zero for missing all of the group¹s votes on key green issues. He was one of nine Republicans scoring the lowest possible rating.³Every other member [of Congress] who received a zero from LCV last year at least had the temerity to show up and vote against the environment and clean energy time after time,² Carl Pope, executive director of the Sierra Club, said in a reply to the scorecard.³And unlike John McCain, I doubt any of them would claim to be environmental leaders or champions on global warming.²Other environmental groups have challenged the zero rating, defending McCain for missing the key votes while on the campaign trail. Republicans for Environmental Protection,

which officially supports McCain¹s candidacy, has charged the LCV and the Sierra Club with undermining the green movement by criticising him.Sierra has asked its estimated 1m members in the US to join the cause, however, writing letters to local newspapers publicising the zero rating and blasting McCain.A brewing green backlash could deflate McCain¹s appeal to moderate voters in the US who identify with his rebellion from the party line. While McCain has distanced himself from past stances on immigration and taxes that hurt him with conservatives, his green credentials remain central to his maverick charm.McCain introduced the Senate¹s first climate change bill in 2003, pioneering the concept of a ³cap and trade² system for industries to swap carbon emissions credits. His LCV green score that year was 53%, with his overall rating since 2001 on 24%. Barack Obama has a lifetime rating of 86%, with Hillary Clinton earning a 90%.Nick Berning, a

spokesman for Friends of the Earth Action, said McCain¹s environmental record is strong only when compared with his fellow Republicans.³When you compare him with the Democrats, he¹s light years away,² Berning said. ³McCain has sold himself as a real environmental champion. When you look at the record, that¹s just not the case.²The latest version of McCain¹s climate change bill would limit US greenhouse gas emissions to 60% of their 1990 levels by 2050. Obama and Clinton¹s climate proposals would cut emissions by 80%, the level that UK and US scientists have said would be needed to prevent dangerous temperature increases.This year¹s climate plan of choice, which is slated for a Senate vote this spring, uses the higher emissions levels of 2005 as a starting point and calls for a 70% cut by 2050. Two supporters of McCain¹s presidential bid drafted the legislation, but he has not endorsed it.McCain¹s spokeswoman told the Washington Post last

autumn that the senator has withheld support for the climate plan ³because it doesn¹t include the nuclear issue by name².David Jenkins, the government affairs director at Republicans for Environmental Protection, advised environmentalists to focus on the bigger picture and give McCain credit for endorsing the principle of mandatory emissions limits.³People should be happy that both candidates [in the 2008 election] will have pledged to make fighting climate change a priority and will both be in favour of carbon caps,² Jenkins said.Penalising McCain for his opposition to broad bills that include a single environmental provision, Jenkins added, misrepresents his record on green issues. When the senator angered green activists by rejecting renewable energy support for the second time, for example, the environmental plan was attached to a broader economic aid bill that McCain opposed.Dan Weiss, director of climate strategy at the liberal Centre

for American Progress, agreed that McCain deserves credit for raising awareness of climate change in the face of resistance from George Bush.But the self-described ³straight talker² has rested on his laurels since, Weiss added: ³He¹s been a former B student who¹s been cruising on his record, even though he¹s been a truant for the past year.²If McCain¹s Democratic opponent can take his environmental legacy down a peg, he stands to suffer with the swing voters who make up a crucial bloc in US presidential elections. Green issues are very important to independents unaffiliated with either US political party, according to a September poll by the group Environmental Defence.That poll found 66% of independents preferring a candidate who wants the US to endorse an international pact limiting emissions regardless of whether China and India are included.McCain has said he would support global pollution caps only if China and India also agree - a

position backed by only 27% of swing voters and a minority of Republicans.Despite McCain¹s zero rating, Berning advised the likely Republican nominee to consider a quick turnaround back to the forefront of the green movement.³There¹s no question that the Democrats have staked out better positions than McCain. Once the primaries are done, it depends on where he positions himself,² Berning said.³He hasn¹t even put forward a detailed global warming plan yet.²© 2008 The Guardian8 Comments so far ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~> Judy Reed AnimalVoicesSpeaking For Animals & Their Environment This is distibuted for

nonprofit research and educational purposes only. [Ref.http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html] You are invited to read past articles and alerts, , or at:AnimalVoicesNews: www.groups-beta.google.comAnimalVoicesNews AnimalVoicesAlerts: www.groups-beta.google.comAnimalVoicesAlerts BushWatchersNews: www.groups-beta.google.com/groups?q=bushwatchernews & start=0 & scoring=dTo , send email to: (close

spaces around @)<AnimalVoicesNews- @ googl><AnimalVoicesAlerts- @ googl> <BushWatcherNews- @ googl> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ ** Commentary is not allowed on AR-News, however, we have a daily AR-NEWS LETTERS email that we send out. If you would like to submit a letter for consideration, fire it over to ARNewsLetters ** To yourself from this list, send email to AR-News- (AT) googl (DOT) com ** For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.comAR-News or http://www.AR-News.org ~+~+~+~+~+~+~ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- http://pets.Fortheanimals7/join