Soy Creamer - should be the NORM, not the exception...

February 25, 2010

We ought to have...portion-controlled soy creamers in every outlet where coffee is servedSoy should be the NORM, not the exception...wherever coffee is served and some lightener/brightener is added to food or drink...

And you can tell 'em that I said so...Maynard S. Clark617-615-9672 (GoogleVoice)http://Maynard.Clark.GooglePages.com

My profiles:

On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Bluesgyrl2 <bluesgyrl2 wrote:

Yes, I know what you mean about justifyng the chemicals. It pains me to think that coffee isn't great either. I am just not prepared to give that up yet. I know it's suppose to be addictive but truly I like the taste, the warmth and of course the perfect creamer.

It is Silk that I am drinking and although it is a bit sweet..............goodbye Coffee Mate!--- On Wed, 2/24/10, sahmomof9 <sahmomof9 wrote:

sahmomof9 <sahmomof9

Re: Re: Soy Creamer Date: Wednesday, February 24, 2010, 9:55 PM

Silk creamer is very, very good. The So Delicious one is thinner (I think) but really just as good. I've used the artificial ones, too, but no longer could justify using chemicals in my diet when I was trying so hard to eat better. It didn't make sense to me. But I still do get tempted by some of those gourmet flavors! Marilyn

Bluesgyrl2 <bluesgyrl2 >Wed, Feb 24, 2010 3:21 pm

Re: Re: Soy Creamer

Im not sure which one I use......... ...but before I became vegan I used Coffee Mate (all chemicals) I thought I wwould have a hard time switching over but I love the soy creamer!--- On Wed, 2/24/10, dcowherd <debbie (AT) pobox (DOT) com> wrote:

dcowherd <debbie (AT) pobox (DOT) com> Re: Soy CreamerWednesday, February 24, 2010, 7:16 PM

The links didn't work for some reason, so here they are again:Turtle Mountain So delicious creamer: http://www.turtlemo untain.com/ products/ coconut_creamer_ original. html

Pam label: http://www.scientif icpsychic. com/fitness/ labels2.htmlJeff's video: http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=yd9XnyNGXGs

, Debbie <debbie wrote:>> According to the nutrition label

> <://www.turtlemount

ain.com/products /coconut_ creamer_original .html>(for the> original flavor) there are *apparently* , no calories from fat per 1> tablespoon serving. In the US if there is less than 0.5 gram of fat per

> serving they are allowed to say there is zero fat. That's why often you> will see products with absurdly small serving sizes, so they can get the> " serving " to have less than 0,5 grams. See the nutrition label for Pam

> cooking spray <ttp://www.scientifi cpsychic. com/fitness/ labels2.html>, which> is very nearly 100% canola oil, yet claims to have no fat -- they've made> the serving size* 1/3 of a second *spray. Who has ever used a 1/3 second

> spray?> > Anyway, I don't use creamer so I don't know if 1 tablespoon is a reasonable> serving size or not, but I routinely see people pouring larger amounts than> that in their coffee. Obviously,

if you use more than 1 tablespoon you'll> need to do the math accordingly.> > Jeff Novick has a discussion of the issue> <http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=yd9XnyNGXGs>with information on how to read

> a nutrition label. Jeff's rule number one is to never, ever believe any> claims made on the package. Because they lie.> > Debbie> > Toni wrote:> > I thought So Delicious was fat free. It says it is on the carton. I

> > hope I haven't been buying something that is not what it says it is. Can> > you let me know why it isn't when it says it is? Thanks. Toni> >> >>