Travel and food

[Guest guest]

There was a good article in the June 1007 issue of Yoga Journal on how to travel with food and your utensils as well as suggestions on connecting with local  growers. It's called Good to Go.WickieOn May 23, 2007, at 1:01 AM, wrote:Bay Area Vegetarians www.BayAreaVeg.orgMessages In This Digest (3 Messages)1."Death by Veganism" - the other side of the story Karen2a.Re: Article - "Death by Veganism" Jack Norris3.a hearty veg welcome to Jonah Jai Nessel! jaigopalkaurView All Topics | Create New TopicMessages1."Death by Veganism" - the other side of the storyPosted by: "Karen" karen   karen_Tue May 22, 2007 6:56 am (PST)Here is the letter to the editor sent yesterday to the New York Times by Dr. John McDougall in response to Nina Planck's article. I hope it is published, but in case not, you can read it here. --------------------- Nina Planck's article condemning vegan diet contains serious errors concerning the adequacy of plant foods. Plants do contain all the essential amino acids in adequate quantities to meet human needs, and even those of children (Millward). Vitamin D is not found in milk or meat, unless it is added during manufacturing. Sunlight is the proper source of this vitamin. Plants manufacture beta-carotene, the precursor of vitamin A. The original source of all minerals (including calcium and zinc) is the ground. Plants are abundant in minerals; and they act as the conduit of minerals to animals. The scientific truth is protein, essential amino acid, mineral, and vitamin (except for B12 which is synthesized by bacteria, not animals) deficiencies are never caused by a diet based on whole plant foods when calorie needs are met. Ms. Planck's distortion of nutritional science is a serious matter that needs to be fixed.Reference: Millward DJ. The nutritional value of plant-based diets in relation to human amino acid and protein requirements. Proc Nutr Soc. 1999 May;58(2):249-60.Addition comments not sent to the newspaper.Nina Planck writes: "You cannot create and nourish a robust baby merely on foods from plants." The scientific truth is: Babies at 6 weeks of age require human breast milk and any other diet means malnutrition. Imagine if the exact opposite approach killed an infant with a formula made of pulverized beef and cow's milk, would this have received similar worldwide press? I believe the case would have been properly considered child neglect (intentional or not) and have gone unnoticed except for those intimately involved. "People love to hear good news about their bad habits" so the tragedy of the death of an infant caused by misguided parents who fed their infant apple juice and soy milk for the first 6 weeks of life has been used to justify eating meat and drinking cow's milk. Nina Planck writes: Protein deficiency is one danger of a vegan diet for babies. Nutritionists used to speak of proteins as "first class" (from meat, fish, eggs and milk) and "second class" (from plants), but today this is considered denigrating to vegetarians. The scientific truth is: Confusion about our protein needs came from studies of the nutritional needs of animals. Mendel and Osborne in 1913 reported rats grew better on animal, than on vegetable, sources of protein. A direct consequence of their studies resulted in meat, eggs, and dairy foods being classified as superior, or "Class A" protein sources and vegetable proteins designated as inferior, or "Class B" proteins. Seems no one considered that rats are not people. One obvious difference in their nutritional needs is rat milk is 11 times more concentrated in protein than is human breast milk. The extra protein supports this animal's rapid growth to adult size in 5 months; while humans take 17 years to fully mature. The world's authority on human protein needs, Prof. Joseph Millward, wrote the following: "Contrary to general opinion, the distinction between dietary protein sources in terms of the nutritional superiority of animal over plant proteins is much more difficult to demonstrate and less relevant in human nutrition." (References in my April 2007 newsletter.)Nina Planck writes: The fact remains, though, that humans prefer animal proteins and fats to cereals and tubers, because they contain all the essential amino acids needed for life in the right ratio. This is not true of plant proteins, which are inferior in quantity and quality — even soy. The scientific truth is: Proteins function as structural materials which build the scaffoldings that maintain cell shapes, enzymes which catalyze biochemical reactions, and hormones which signal messages between cells—to name only a few of their vital roles. Since plants are made up of structurally sound cells with enzymes and hormones, they are by nature rich sources of proteins. In fact, so rich are plants that they can meet the protein needs of the earth's largest animals: elephants, hippopotamuses, giraffes, and cows. You would be correct to deduce that the protein needs of relatively small humans can easily be met by plants. (References in my April 2007 newsletter.) Nina Planck writes: Yet even a breast-fed baby is at risk. Studies show that vegan breast milk lacks enough docosahexaenoic acid, or DHA, the omega-3 fat found in fatty fish.The scientific truth is: Only plants can synthesize essential fats. Any DHA found in animals had its origin from a plant (as alpha linolenic acid). The human body has no difficulty converting plant-derived omega-3 fat, alpha linolenic acid, into DHA or other n-3 fatty acids, supplying our needs even during gestation and infancy. Reference: Langdon JH. Has an aquatic diet been necessary for hominin brain evolution and functional development? Br J Nutr. 2006 Jul;96(1):7-17.Mothers who eat the Western diet pass dangerous loads of environmental contaminants through their breast milk to their infants. Meat, dairy and fish in her diet are the source of 80% to 90% of these toxic chemicals. The cleanest and healthiest milk is made by mothers eating a starch-based vegan diet.Nina Planck writes: A vegan diet is equally dangerous for weaned babies and toddlers, who need plenty of protein and calcium.The scientific truth is: Infants should be exclusively breast fed until age 6 months and then partially breast fed until approximately 2 years of age. Starches, fruits, and vegetables should be added after the age of 6 months. The addition of cow's milk causes problems as common as constipation and as devastating as type-1 diabetes. (See my May 2003 newsletter on Marketing Milk and Disease.) Adding meat to an infant's diet is one of the main reasons all children raised on the Western diet have the beginnings of atherosclerosis by the age of 2 years. Nina Planck writes: "An adult who was well-nourished in utero and in infancy may choose to get by on a vegan diet, but babies are built from protein, calcium, cholesterol and fish oil."The scientific truth is: Babies are ideally built from mother's breast milk initially and then from whole foods. Hopefully, parents will realize that the healthiest diet for the entire family (after weaning) is based on starches with the addition of fruits and vegetables. (Vitamin B12 is added to the diet of pregnant or nursing mothers and after 3 years of following a plant-based diet strictly.)Nina Planck has been allowed by the New York Times to exploit the tragedy of a family and to spread commonly held, but scientifically incorrect, information on human nutrition. The author and the newspaper should be held accountable. Hopefully, the end result will be that people desiring the truth will take the trouble to look at the evidence. If this were to be the case, then this New York Times article could be the beginning of long overdue changes in the ways people eat. Write and tell everyone you know that the New York Times has done a sloppy job, and damage to the public, by allowing harmful lies to be spread—especially when you consider that Planck's message promotes a diet known to cause obesity, type-2 diabetes, heart disease, and major cancers. John McDougall, MDhttp://www.drmcdougall.com/May 21, 2007Back to topReply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post Messages in this topic (1)2a.Re: Article - "Death by Veganism"Posted by: "Jack Norris" jacknorris   b12boy2000Tue May 22, 2007 10:40 am (PST)Many people have sent in letters to the NY Times about this. Below is the one I sent in. Unfortunately, it could only be 150 words, not much space to write much.Jack Norris, Registered DietitianVegan Outreachwww.veganoutreach.org- "Jack Norris" <jacknorris (AT) spamarrest (DOT) com><letters (AT) nytimes (DOT) com>Monday, May 21, 2007 11:09 AMNina Plank's Essay> Dear Editor:>> Nina Plank's piece "Death by Veganism" (5/21/07) is a classic case of> ignorant dietary extremism getting debunked by ignorant dietary extremism.> Prosecutor Chuck Boring said that it was not because the child was fed a> vegan diet but rather that "The child died because he was not fed. > Period.">> According to the American Dietetic Association, "Well-planned vegan and> other types of vegetarian diets are appropriate for all stages of the life> cycle, including during pregnancy, lactation, infancy, childhood, and> adolescence." (J Am Diet Assoc. 2003 Jun;103(6):748-65.) I have met > dozens,> if not hundreds, of healthy children who have been raised as vegans from> birth.>> As with any diet, parents must make sure their children are getting all> necessary nutrients. VeganHealth.org contains helpful information or links> for anyone considering a vegan pregnancy or raising their children as> vegans. It also has a page showing numerous thriving children who were> raised from birth as vegans.>> Jack Norris, Registered Dietitian, Editor> VeganHealth.orgBack to topReply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post Messages in this topic (4)3.a hearty veg welcome to Jonah Jai Nessel!Posted by: "jaigopalkaur" jaigopalkaur   jaigopalkaurTue May 22, 2007 11:55 am (PST)Hi All,I'd like to welcome the group's newest and youngest memeber, Jonah Jai Nessel. The birth annoucement from Ari is below. Congrats, Ari and Becky!love,Andrea Dear Friends and Family,Becky and I are extremely happy to announce the arrival of our baby boy Jonah Jai Nessel. Jonah in Hebrew means "dove" and is a symbol of peace. "Jai" is a Sanskrit word that translates roughly as victory, hallelujah or amen. Thus, Jonah Jai, in my own very un-scientific translation is "May Peace Prevail". We are grateful to share our lives with this wonderful new addition, and all of our friends and family. I am confident both our new child and his new parents open each others eyes to the miracle and the promise that lies in each moment of our precious lives.Namaste,Ari & BeckyBack to topReply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post Messages in this topic (1)Recent Activity5New MembersVisit Your Group