Guest guest Posted January 26, 2007 Report Share Posted January 26, 2007 As part of the SF Indie (Film) Fest, a film called " Your Mommy Kills Animals " will be showing at the Roxie Cinema in S.F., on February 19, 2007 at 7 PM. Click the link for a description/review. http://www.sfindie.com/site/node/277 The Film Fest website: http://www.sfindie.com/site/event/2007/02/08/month/all/8 The film is described as being " even-handed " , but would anyone be interested in contacting Indie Fest to see if there could be at least a short discussion or panel or SOMETHING after the film? (I cannot volunteer for this, unfortunately.) There is always a Q & A session after a film if the director or producer of a film is present. The film showing after this one doesn't start until 9:30, so there's at least 30-45 minutes before they have to let the audience in for the next film (whatever that one may be, because that slot is a TBA slot). Just a thought. The issue of animal rights/free speech is particularly interesting and relevant in light of the recent passage of the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act. If you have any ideas, don't contact me -- I really can't do anything to help organize such a thing. But I'll definitely be there!! Nadine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 30, 2007 Report Share Posted January 30, 2007 I just read the description of the SF Indie Film movie, "Your Mommy Kills Animals," posted by Nadine I haven't seen the film, but from the description, the thesis seems to be that by exercising free-speech rights, animal rights advocates are threatening others' free-speech rights, who presumably have something more "important" to talk about. It concludes: "Your Mommy Kills Animals paints a dire portrait of the state of American civil liberties, but it also makes clear that the protesters outside Schumacher Furs [animal rights' protesters] not only are failing to save animals—they're not doing your freedom of speech any favors, either." The idea that one group is damaging the right to free speech by speaking is patently ridiculous. The one threatening speech is the one urging others to self-censorship for fear the government will impose laws like the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act on other movements. As Judge Berzon wrote in an opinion dissenting from a Ninth Circuit decision upholding the conviction of anti-abortion activists for "threatening" speech against abortion providers: "If we are not willing to provide stringent First Amendment protection and a fair trial to those with whom we as a society disagree as well as those with whom we agree -- as the Supreme Court did when it struck down the conviction of members of the Ku Klux Klan for their racist, violence-condoning speech in Brandenburg -- the First Amendment will become a dead letter. Moreover, the next protest group -- which may be a new civil rights movement or another group eventually vindicated by acceptance of their goals by society at large -- will (unless we cease fulfilling our obligation as judges to be evenhanded) be censored according to the rules applied to the last." Thea Looking for earth-friendly autos? Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Autos' Green Center. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 30, 2007 Report Share Posted January 30, 2007 More reviews: http://www.cinephelia.com/movie_detail.asp?PK=288 http://www.buzzine.com/contentengine/publish/buzzine/reviews/ article_2072.html and an interview with the film maker: http://www.cinephelia.com/curt_johnson_01_2006.asp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.