Guest guest Posted March 17, 2006 Report Share Posted March 17, 2006 > Toronto is one of the largest cities in North > America that has no > significant electricity generation capacity within > its own vicinity – the > city generates just 1.2% of the power used within > its boundaries while using > close to 20% of the power produced in Ontario. > > Currently, the central city south of Eglinton > (between Hwy. 427 and Victoria > Park) receives almost its entire electricity supply > via two Hydro One > transmission corridors. This leaves the city highly > reliant on large > centralized supply sources outside of the city, such > as the Pickering and > Darlington nuclear stations and the giant Nanticoke > coal-fired station on > Lake Erie. > > This tenuous power situation has led to two > proposals to build new > generation facilities on the eastern waterfront: > > > > * The Portlands Energy Centre (PEC) is a joint > venture of Ontario > Power Generation and TransCanada that is proposing > to build a 550 megawatt > (MW) combined-cycle natural gas power plant near the > site of the mothballed > Hearn Generating Station. > > > * The Toronto Waterfront Clean Energy Centre (TWCEC) > is a joint > project of Toronto Hydro and Constellation Energy > that is proposing to build > a 291 MW simple-cycle natural gas plant within the > existing Hearn structure. > > > > Our new Air Quality Issues fact sheet, Meeting > Toronto’s Electricity Supply > Needs: A comparison of the Portlands Energy Centre > and the Toronto > Waterfront Clean Energy Centre, looks at these two > proposals in terms of > energy efficiency; air emissions; contribution > towards the phase-out of > coal-burning at Nanticoke; and contribution towards > increasing Toronto’s > security of electricity supply. > > We recommend that energy efficiency and conservation > initiatives that are > part of both proposals be aggressively pursued no > matter which one actually > proceeds, and that the City of Toronto work with > Enwave Energy Corporation > to ensure that the new plant can be made as > efficient as possible by serving > a district heating and/or cooling system through co- > or tri-generation > technology. > > We also recommend that the Ontario Power Authority > consider both the net > emission reductions and power replacement potential > of the proposals > vis-à-vis the Nanticoke Generating Station, Canada’s > No. 1 air polluter and > a major contributor to smog throughout Southern > Ontario. > > The fact sheet is available for viewing on our > website at > www.cleanairalliance.org > <http://www.cleanairalliance.org/> . > > Please pass this message on to your friends. > > Thank you. > > Jessica Fracassi > Communications & Membership Manager > Ontario Clean Air Alliance > 402-625 Church St, Toronto M4Y 2G1 > Phone: 416-926-1907 ext. 245 > Fax: 416-926-1601 > Email: contact > Website: www.cleanairalliance.org > > _____ > > The Ontario Clean Air Alliance is a coalition of > health, environmental and > consumer organizations, faith communities, unions, > utilities, municipalities > and individuals working for cleaner air through a > coal phase-out and the > shift to a renewable electricity future. Our > partner organizations > represent more than six million Ontarians. > > To or to > <http://www.cleanairalliance.org/getin> this > list please > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.