Fwd: FW: FAO weighs in on marking distinction between low-till and conservation agriculture

[Guest guest]

>

> Editor's Note: FAO Agricultural Engineer, Theodor

> Friedrich, offers further clarification on the

> distinction between unsustainable low-till

> approaches to agriculture and the much more

> sustainable conservation agriculture. FAO work in

> Africa as mentioned in the initial press release

> which sparked this discussion should correctly be

> labelled conservation agriculture. Please see this

> discussion reproduced in its entirety below.

>

> Dear Editor,

>

> With interest and dismay we have taken notice of the

> reaction of your readers on FAO's work on

> conservation agriculture in Africa, which you have

> entitled low-till. In fact, although the FAO press

> release tries to simplify the language, the FAO

> article clearly refers to " Conservation Agriculture "

> and not to no-till or low-till as the kind of

> agriculture FAO is promoting, not only in Africa.

>

> FAO is fully aware about the existence of

> unsustainable no-till systems with heavy reliance on

> herbicides. Such systems are in fact not understood

> with Conservation Agriculture. Even in the US, where

> this kind of no-till agriculture is rather popular,

> there is now a new movement of " never till " , which

> comes much closer to Conservation Agriculture. The

> three principles of conservation agriculture have

> indeed been clearly mentioned in the FAO press

> release:

>

> - minimum soil disturbance

>

> - permanent soil cover

>

> - diversified crop rotations.

>

> I am very glad that one of your readers at least

> mentioned Masanobu Fukuoka's one Straw Revolution,

> which together with Edward Faulkners Ploughmen's

> folly resembles very well the thinking behind

> Conservation Agriculture. Your readers obviously

> would have benefited from attending the III World

> Congress on Conservation Agriculture in Kenya, which

> was the event for which the FAO press release was

> launched. During that congress 100 participating

> farmers from several African countries provided an

> impressive testimony about their appreciation of

> Conservation Agriculture. And they were all small

> scale farmers.

>

> By the way: the German's did not receive any

> benefits from funding a development project in

> Africa, because there is no German equipment

> available for small farmer's doing conservation

> agriculture.

>

> I would like to invite your readers to familiarize

> themselves more with the Conservation Agriculture

> Programme of FAO and of the other involved

> organizations, such as the African Conservation

> Tillage Network. It might be interesting for them to

> find out, that it is not only the NGOs doing the

> good things and the public organizations doing the

> bad things. Even UN organizations can eventually

> have programmes for the actual benefit of poor

> people and the environment.

>

> For further information

> http://www.fao.org/ag/agl/agll/prtcons.stm

>

> Best regards,

>

> Theodor Friedrich

>

> Senior Agricultural Engineer

>

> FAO Agricultural and Food Engineering Technologies

> Service

>

> Viale delle Terme di Caracalla

>

> 00100 Rome, Italy

>

> Tel: +39-065705-5694; Fax: +39-065705-6798

>

> e-mail: Theodor.Friedrich

>

> URL: http://www.fao.org/ag/ags/home/en/agst.html

>

>

> Food News [foodnews]

> 12 October 2005 06:43

> Food News

> Another Perspective on Low-Till Farming

>

> Editor's Note: Last week Foodnews posted an article

> by the FAO on the advantages of low-till agriculture

> in Africa

> (http://allafrica.com/stories/200510040254.html). A

> number of readers responded to this posting,

> pointing out that there is a distinction between

> commercial and other forms of no and low-till

> agriculture. Low-tillfarming often involves the

> heavy use of chemical inputs and is advocated by

> large-scale, capital intensive agriculture.

>

>

>

> According to Foodnews reader and organic farmer John

> Wise: " The majority of North American farmers use

> low-till or no-till farming to reduce erosion,

> reduce trips over the field (saving time, machine

> wear, and fuel), and to improve soil structure. The

> downside: weeds do grow, despite the mulch layer,

> and are sprayed with herbicide, usually glyphosate

> (Roundup). Roundup is the no-till farmer's plough. "

>

>

>

> In the African context, with the exception of

> industrial-scale agriculture, most farming in Africa

> is already low-till, typically involving a

> " home-made hoe and (usually) an exhausted woman

> trying to scrape enough soil together to perhaps

> provide sustenance for one more day for herself and

> her babies, " according to another reader. At the

> commercial level, low till refers to farming that is

> capital intensive and involves extremely costly

> cultivation equipment that is of little benefit to

> poor farmers of the south. This same reader

> concludes with the following comment:

>

>

>

> " Maybe check to see if this German " benefit " is

> about selling German equipment before suggesting

> that it might help the 3rd world's billions of

> people with their ¼ hectare farms and life and death

> struggles. These would be the same families who had

> ½ hectare farms before the " green revolution " of the

> 1960's and 1970's came along and devastated much of

> the wisdom of sustainable practices - making the

> rich richer, the poor poorer and accelerating the

> desperate move to urban slums of the newly landless

> rural poor that continues today. "

>

>

>

> Cathy Holtslander writes " No Till is also herbicide

> dependent, and often uses GMO herbicide-resistant

> crops. Because it is so capital and input intensive

> it results in the big farmers getting bigger and the

> small farmers getting pushed out. FAO is trying to

> promote GMOs in Africa, and this looks like a Trojan

> horse to me.

>

>

>

> Another r brought to our attention a paper

> prepared for the UN FAO that sought to understand

> the adoption of conservation agriculture (CA).

> http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/004/Y2781E/Y2781E00.HTM

>

>

>

> A key conclusion emphasizes the need to be attentive

> to local conditions and to resist one size fits all

> approaches to agriculture:

>

> " The above analysis contains implications for

> policy-makers. On the one hand, an assumption that

> CA will spread on its own in some desirable fashion

> is not appropriate. On the other hand, a uniform

> policy prescription to fit many locations is not

> realistic either, whether it consists of direct

> interventions or more indirect incentives stemming

> from research and development, or some mix of both.

> Designing successful policies to promote CA is

> likely to start with a thorough understanding of

> farm-level conditions. This understanding needs to

> include management objectives, attitudes to risk,

> willingness to make trade-offs between stewardship

> and profits. The next step is the careful design of

> location-sensitive programmes that draw on a range

> of policy tools. Flexibility is liable to be a key

> element in policy design to promote CA.

>

>

>

> Finally, Foodnews rs have also brought to

> light that there are versions of low or no-till

> farming that do not rely on heavy chemical inputs

> and do pay attention to varied ecosystems. These

> include permaculture and the Japanese " One Straw

> Revolution " which advocates no chemical inputs and

> the incorporation rather then extermination of

> useful weeds. Another approach is Natural Systems

> Agriculture (NSA). Below is an article from The Land

> Institute, describing this approach.

>

>

>

> Many thanks to readers for contributions.

>

>

>

> This story was printed from The Land Institute

> (http://www.landinstitute.org).

>

> Natural Systems Agriculture at The Land Institute

>

> Jacob Gatschet

>

> Released September 1997

>

>

> Shortly after The Land Institute began in 1976 near

> Salina, Kansas, its founder and current president,

> Wes Jackson, published a paper which became the

> cornerstone of the institute's programs and vision.

> That paper, later expanded into New Roots for

> Agriculture, argues that we have a problem of

> agriculture, not just problems in agriculture. And

> the core problem is soil erosion, a problem nearly

> as old as agriculture itself.

>

>

>

> The transition made by our ancestors 8-10,000 years

> ago from hunting and gathering to agriculture

> represented a significant shift in terms of

> ecological impact. Initially they probably did not

> notice the destructive power of their farming, for

> in the great valley civilizations they could

> assemble monocultures of annuals for centuries on

> end and get away with it. Their high-yielding annual

> grains, planted in monocultures in the expansive

> fields of the Tigris, Euphrates, Nile, Indus and

> Ganges valleys, were fertilized by periodic flooding

> - a sort of extractive economy, more or less

> acceptable, for nutrients were being chipped from

> the mountain highlands and sent to fields below. As

> populations grew, the agriculture of the valley was

> carried to the hills. The consequences of farming

> then became more devastating and apparent because

> only the flattest of lands can escape problems of

> soil erosion. (About seven-eighths of the tillable

> land in the US slopes enough that rain washes away

> the topsoil. The effects of wind erosion, of course,

> are more independent of slope.)

>

>

>

> Soil loss and soil degradation have historically

> been " offset " by overdraft of water resources and by

> appropriating lands which are either ill-suited for

> agricultural production or which have been serving

> vital ecological functions. As agricultural land is

> spoiled, wilderness lands are converted to

> agricultural uses. Jackson sums up this

> oft-overlooked causal relationship, " If we don't

> save agriculture, we won't save wilderness. "

>

>

>

> Because we have continued to ignore the basic

> dilemma faced by our ancestral farmers millennia

> ago, we have had to employ ever more drastic means

> of compensation. Most recently in historical terms,

> this compensation has taken the form of massive

> inputs of " ancient sunlight " (fossil fuel) for

> traction purposes, for control of pests and

> pathogens and for fertility (natural gas being the

> stock for anhydrous ammonia). Compensation has also

> meant the adoption of genetically narrow,

> high-yielding strains of seeds. As the situation

> becomes more critical, increasingly technological

> fixes are being pursued, such as " precision [or

> satellite] farming " and the engineering of

> herbicide-resistant seeds. None of these responses,

> however, addresses the fundamental problem of soil

> erosion; indeed, they might very well exacerbate it.

> Even no- and low-till practices, because of their

> heavy reliance on herbicides, pesticides and

> fertilizers, amount to poisoning our soil in order

> to save it. " Anyone aware of Darwin and modern

> molecular studies, " Jackson says, " knows it's not

> very smart to put into our food system any chemicals

> which our human tissues have no evolutionary

> experience with. These chemicals ought to be assumed

> guilty until proven innocent, not the other way

> around. "

>

>

>

> Many ecologically-minded persons consider

> industrialization the culprit and see a potential

> solution in the widespread adoption of more

> sustainable methods of agriculture. Jackson

> vehemently disagrees at the same time that he

> supports such efforts. According to Jackson,

> industrialization has served mainly to accelerate

> and intensify destructive farming processes that

> have been in place for millennia, but the

> sustainable agriculture movement has made important

> improvements. " We depend upon their increasing

> success to save as much soil as possible, " he notes,

> " but their practices are truly sustainable only on

> very flat land, which is about one-eighth of the

> tillable land in the US. I'm worried about the other

> seven-eighths. "

>

>

>

> The severity of the problem is enormous, as borne

> out by some rather grim statistics. A major recent

> study published in Science pegged the cost of soil

> erosion at $44 billion per year in the US alone.

> Reliable estimates contend that up to half of

> America's topsoil has run to the rivers and seas

> since the white settlement of this continent.

> Meanwhile, the average rate of topsoil erosion in

> the US continues at five tons per acre per year; for

> croplands it is nine tons per acre per year.

>

>

>

> But can soil erosion be such a dangerous problem if

> it has been going on for thousands of years? First,

> contrary to the thinking implicit in this question,

> the damaging and widespread effects of soil erosion

> have already appeared numerous times. History bears

> out a disturbing pattern: worn out and eroded soils

> cause civilizations to crash, and if they do rebound

> it is to a reduced level. Vernon Gill Carter and Tom

> Dale point out in Topsoil and Civilization, " All

> across the continent of Asia and into Europe and

> North Africa, you find the seats of former leading

> civilizations that are now among the backward areas

> of the world. ...

>

> These are the lands from whence our western

> civilization arose. " Secondly, the question itself

> reflects the seriousness of the problem. Food

> depends on soil. Agricultural use of fossil fuel

> inputs cannot mask the true costs of soil loss

> forever, and the confidence in a future high-tech

> soil alternative is sorely misplaced. According to

> Donald Worster, chair of The Land Institute's board

> and the Hall Distinguished Professor in history at

> the University of Kansas who authored the 1980

> Bancroft Prize-winning Dust Bowl, " the common

> American confidence in technological remedies for

> erosion must appear dangerously naive. We can no

> more manufacture a soil with a tank of chemicals

> than we can invent a rainforest or produce a single

> bird. " In short, soil is the only medium in which

> enough plants will grow to capture and convert

> sunlight into the food we need.

>

>

>

> The Land Institute's major program, Natural Systems

> Agriculture (NSA), seeks to meld conservation with

> agricultural production. Jackson is quick to point

> out that Natural Systems Agriculture is an entirely

> new paradigm of food production rather than a type

> of sustainable agriculture. NSA begins by looking at

> what nature produces in an area when left

> unmolested. Because nature has built up over the

> millennia a great wisdom in fitting flora and fauna

> to the particular soils, weather, and geology of any

> given locale, NSA attempts to understand and mimic

> the complexities of these relations and their

> interactions.

>

>

>

> For The Land Institute, that means looking to the

> prairie that once blanketed the plains. There is

> another reason for The Land Institute to look to the

> prairie; it is the home of the grasses, the plant

> family which provides most of the important food for

> humanity. Grains such as wheat, corn and rice - all

> of which are annual grasses - comprise almost 80

> percent of the human calorie intake worldwide.

>

>

>

> Compared to agricultural systems of annuals which

> have historically eroded and degraded ecological

> capital as they provide for human needs, the prairie

> shows a remarkable " wisdom. " Prairies don't lose

> soil beyond replacement levels; in fact they build

> soil over time. Their perennial grasses grow from

> the same roots each spring, avoiding the tilling

> which lays the soil bare to erosion. Furthermore,

> prairies run on contemporary sunlight, recycle their

> materials, and sponsor their own nitrogen fertility.

> The prairie's biodiversity, a product of

> evolutionary processes over many millennia, provides

> the ecosystem with built-in resilience to

> environmental and other disturbances, such as pests

> and pathogens. Natural Systems Agriculture attempts

> to mimic the structures of a native ecosystem like

> the prairie in order to obtain these attendant

> benefits.

>

>

>

> Jackson realizes the boldness of the claim that for

> the first time in history, an agriculture that is

> resilient (and therefore productive over the

> long-term), economical (the need for costly inputs

> would be significantly diminished), and

> environmentally responsible is well within reach.

> " Although I hesitate to employ an industrial

> metaphor, " Jackson says, " we've had our 'Kitty Hawk'

> - we've shown the feasibility of Natural Systems

> Agriculture - and now comes the 'wind tunnel'

> phase. " The " wind tunnel " phase has meant working to

> put NSA into a position where it can take on a life

> of its own and become a national effort.

>

>

>

> Not surprisingly, NSA requires a different type of

> scientist, one who appreciates the importance of

> context, evolution, ecology and therefore restraint.

> There is necessary scientific work to be done (for

> example, in the attempt to perennialize our current

> major crops and domesticate wild perennials), but

> Jackson argues it must take place in a framework

> that favors nature's wisdom over human cleverness.

> Science done in the service of NSA will therefore

> have to be done in a different way. The traditional,

> reductive approach is inadequate. For example,

> individual candidate species cannot be selected

> without at the same time designing for the larger

> " whole " of the domestic prairie. Yet the " whole "

> influences which species will " work " in the mix. As

> Jackson puts it, " Parts affect wholes, and wholes

> affect parts. "

>

>

>

> The Land Institute has several other programs which

> complement and support its research, education, and

> public policy efforts in NSA. The Sunshine Farm

> Project, which is in year 5 of a 10-year term, is an

> exploration of the potential of conventional annual

> crops and livestock without fossil fuels, chemicals,

> or irrigation to determine a more accurate

> ecological cost for food production. Detailed

> records are kept for the energy, materials, and

> labor for each operation. Each year the Intern

> Program welcomes eight to ten post-baccalaureate

> students who engage in a 43-week " head and hands "

> experience, learning more about sustainable

> agriculture and its integration into a sustainable

> society. Their time goes to research assistance,

> classroom discussions and lectures, seminars with

> visiting scholars, public events, and farm labor.

> And finally, the Rural Community Studies program,

> located in the small community of Matfield Green in

> the Flint Hills of Kansas, focuses on such issues as

> why small rural communities are losing their young

> people to cities, how this depopulation is related

> to land use, and how rural schools can be catalysts

> for change. The program aims to develop conceptual

> tools which will help communities minimize

> dependence upon non-renewable resources and maximize

> possibilities for cultural innovation and

> adaptation.

>

>

>

> Original Posting October 4, 2005

>

>

>

> Editor's Note: At the Third World Congress on

> Conservation Agriculture, running October 3-7th in

> Kenya, the FAO is advocating low-till agriculture as

> an important part of efforts to reduce hunger and

> poverty on the continent. Low-till agriculture saves

> on time, labour, fuel, chemical inputs and also can

> reverse land and soil degradation.

>

>

>

> http://allafrica.com/stories/200510040254.html

>

> Disturbing the Soil As Little As Possible --

> Conservation Agriculture Holds Promise for Food

> Production in Africa

>

> Food and Agriculture Organization of the United

> Nations (Rome)

> PRESS RELEASE

> October 3, 2005

> Posted to the web October 4, 2005

> Rome

>

> Conservation agriculture holds considerable promise

> for farmers in sub-Saharan Africa because it can

> control soil erosion, reverse land degradation, give

> more stable yields and reduce labour and fuel needs,

> FAO said today on the eve of the Third World

> Congress on Conservation Agriculture in Nairobi (3-7

> October 2005).

>

> The meeting aims to examine evidence of recent

> experience in Africa and other parts of the globe

> and to promote discussion of it among

> decision-makers in governments, farmers, civil

> society, international agencies and donor countries.

>

>

> Unlike conventional farming methods, conservation

> agriculture disturbs the soil as little as possible.

> Instead of ploughing, farmers plant their seed

> directly into the soil and the soil is kept covered.

>

>

> " With conservation agriculture, farmers can produce

> more food on a sustainable basis, they spend less

> time and labour on land preparation, fuel

> consumption for machinery is lower and there is a

> reduced need for chemicals, " said Shivaji Pandey,

> Director of FAO's Agricultural Support Systems

> Division. " The concept contributes directly to the

> fight against hunger and poverty. "

>

> Traditional farming in Africa often impoverishes the

> soil: intensive digging with hand hoes or ploughing

> has often damaged the soil structure, reduced its

> ability to hold moisture and has caused wind and

> water erosion. Water cannot soak into the soil and

> runs off, carrying topsoil and nutrients with it.

> Furthermore, many families living with HIV/AIDS and

> malaria can no longer farm enough land to grow the

> food they need.

>

> Conservation agriculture offers help:

>

> Instead of labour-intensive ploughing, farmers can

> plant their seed directly into the soil. They can

> use a simple hoe, inexpensive jab-planters or

> animal-drawn direct seeders.

>

> Crop residues or a special cover crop keep the soil

> covered. This protects the soil from erosion, adds

> organic matter, fixes nitrogen and most importantly,

> conserves soil moisture. The soil cover also

> suppresses weeds - so less work is needed to remove

> them.

>

> Instead of planting a single crop time after time,

> farmers should sow several crops in rotation. This

> raises fertility and prevents pest and disease

> outbreaks. The system has also been adapted for

> vegetables and root crops.

>

> Conservation agriculture is especially attractive

> for women because it reduces the amount of work they

> traditionally do in land preparation and weeding.

> For families living with HIV/AIDS, conservation

> agriculture offers a way to grow a diversified diet

> using less labour.

>

> Conservation agriculture is already practised

> successfully on around 90 million hectares worldwide

> but particularly in North and South America and the

> rice-wheat system of South Asia.

>

> Spreading in Africa

>

> Conservation agriculture has started to spread in

> Africa and is being adopted in Burkina Faso,

> Cameroon, Chad, Eritrea, Ghana, Kenya, Lesotho,

> Madagascar, Mali, Mozambique, South Africa,

> Swaziland, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia. Some farmers

> have doubled or even tripled their grain yields.

>

> In Kenya and Tanzania, FAO is implementing a

> conservation agriculture project with small-scale

> farmers in eight districts. The project is financed

> by Germany.

>

> In Zambia, conservation agriculture has helped

> vulnerable households pull through drought and

> livestock epidemics. Over 200 000 farmers are now

> practising this technique. In the 2000-2001 drought,

> farmers who used conservation agriculture managed to

> harvest one crop, others farming with conventional

> methods faced total crop failure.

>

> In Ghana, more than 350 000 farmers now use

> conservation agriculture.

>

> WHO WE ARE: This e-mail service shares information

> to help more people discuss crucial policy issues

> affecting global food security. The service is

> managed by Amber McNair of the University of Toronto

> in partnership with the Centre for Urban Health

> Initiatives (CUHI) and Wayne Roberts of the Toronto

> Food Policy Council, in partnership with the

> Community Food Security Coalition, World Hunger

> Year, and International Partners for Sustainable

> Agriculture.

> Please help by sending information or names and

> e-mail addresses of co-workers who'd like to receive

> this service, to foodnews

 

 

I have decided to do the CN Tower

Climb for World Wildlife Fund. this link should take you to the 'sponsor a

climber' page, where you can search by name for someone. search for my name

(alison syer) and you should be able to find it.

 

https://wwfcentral.ca/NetCommunity/SSLPage.aspx? & pid=232 & srcid=232 & tab=1