Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Japan pushes to whale

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 12:00 a.m. Pacific

 

 

Close-up

Japanese lobbying to ease curbs on whale harvests

 

By Hal bernton

Seattle Times staff reporter

 

 

NAOKAZU OINUMA / THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Japanese college students Naoko Uno, left, and Kei Morita, both 20, have a

bite of deep-fried whale meat in downtown Tokyo last week. The samples were

offered as part of a national campaign to support whaling.

 

 

E-mail this article

 

Print this article

 

Search web archive

 

 

Related stories

 

Injunction is sought to halt tribe's spring hunt

 

April 15: Makah leaders say more pressing needs than whale hunts face their

people

 

 

 

 

Delegates arriving at the International Whaling Commission meeting next

month in Shimonoseki, Japan, will be greeted by boisterous demonstrations -

not in protest but in favor of whaling.

This year's annual meeting takes place in the home port of Japan's faded

factory whaling fleet, which harpoons hundreds of whales annually in the

name of science.

 

Six representatives from the Makah Tribe of northwest Washington also will

be at Shimonoseki to lobby for a five-year extension of its existing quota,

allowing the tribe to take 20 gray whales through 2008. IWC approval,

though, is no sure bet.

 

Although the tribe has taken just one gray whale, in 1999, and no families

have yet applied for a permit to go hunting this spring, the tribe is

adamant that it wants to preserve its treaty right to do so in coming years.

 

The Makah request will likely be a sideshow in a meeting dominated by

Japan's controversial agenda, which includes expansion of its " scientific "

whaling program and its push to finalize rules for a new era of commercial

hunting.

 

The meetings, scheduled for the week of May 20, are expected to draw

delegations from at least 30 of the 43 member nations of the IWC.

 

" This is expected to be one of the most difficult meetings of the past 20

years. There are a lot of big issues on the table, " said Rollie Schmitten,

federal fishery official who will head the U.S. delegation to the meeting.

 

In anticipation of a showdown over whaling, Japan is trying to whip up

homeland support by playing to its seafaring island-nation traditions.

Symposiums are scheduled on Japan's storied whaling history and its culinary

skill in preparing whale meat.

 

Three motor caravans are touring the country promoting whaling. Pro-whaling

posters have popped up in railway stations. To boost consumption, April 9

was proclaimed " Eat More Whale Day. "

 

The campaign will culminate with a week of pro-whaling demonstrations

outside the commission meeting hall.

 

Also on hand - meeting, caucusing and striving to influence the outcome -

will be dozens of observers drawn from the ranks of environmental and

animal-rights groups, as well as an international potpourri of whalers

ranging from the Grenadines to the Makahs.

 

Japan's appetite for whale

 

The Japanese have been eating whales for centuries, and in the difficult

postwar years baleen products were a staple. By the early 1960s, Shimonoseki

was home port to catcher boats, freezer ships and tankers that killed

thousands of whales a year. Supermarkets sold the meat, and street vendors

hawked a baleen bacon.

 

Today, whale meat is a scarce item among a population increasingly turning

to other foodstuffs. According to a survey published last month in the

Japanese newspaper Asahi Shimbun, only 4 percent of the population say they

sometimes eat whale, 53 percent claim to have eaten whale " a long time ago, "

and 33 percent say they have never eaten whale.

 

Despite the drop in consumption, Japan's government remains deeply committed

to whaling as part of a broader claim to harvest resources from the sea.

 

Japan officially abides by an IWC moratorium on commercial hunts of 13

species of whales. But through the '90s, the Japanese government expanded

its " scientific " hunt that kills in the name of research and helps meet

expenses through the sale of whale meat and byproducts.

 

If any of the commission delegates seeks a taste of whale, there should be

plenty on hand. The Shimonoseki fleet earlier this month returned from

Antarctica with some 2,000 tons of fresh minke.

 

Despite the drop in consumption, Japan's government remains deeply committed

to whaling as part of a broader claim to harvest resources from the sea.

Japan once found plenty of support on the commission.

 

IWC members at odds

 

Formed in 1946 to conserve 13 species of whales, the IWC used to embrace

commercial harvests. Indeed, its initial goal was to use conservation to

" thus make possible the orderly development of the industry, " according to

its founding charter.

 

The whaling commission has no power to impose economic sanctions but gets

its clout through the international legitimacy conferred to those who follow

its rules.

 

Today, most of the 43 member nations support limited hunting for aboriginal

subsistence harvests. But they are bitterly divided over commercial whaling.

Some members, including the United States, want to abandon such kills in an

age when whales have gained international appeal as symbols of the marine

environment. They succeeded in passing a 1986 moratorium on commercial hunts

of 13 species.

 

Other members, led by Japan and Norway, argue that whales should be

harvested - just like fish - on a sustainable basis.

 

" We don't want to have huge commercial whaling like in the past, " said Yagi

Nobuyuki, the first secretary of Japan's embassy in Washington, D.C. " We

want to see a reasonable harvest. "

 

Japan officially abides by an IWC moratorium on commercial hunts of 13

species of whales. But through the '90s, the Japanese government expanded

its " scientific " hunt that kills in the name of research and helps meet

expenses through the sale of whale meat and byproducts.

 

Even with the moratorium in place, commercial whaling continues. Norway, an

IWC member nation, now hunts minke whales in the North Atlantic.

 

At the May meeting in Japan, much of the agenda will be taken over by

Japan's bid for rules that could someday regulate future commercial whaling.

 

But lifting the moratorium would require the support of three-quarters of

the IWC members. And Japan - despite recruiting supporters with offers of

financial aid - still lacks the votes.

 

" That won't happen. I can guarantee it, " said Schmitten, the U.S. delegation

leader.

 

The Makah claim

 

In 1997, a Makah tribal delegation ventured to the IWC meeting in Monaco to

win approval for its long-standing treaty right to hunt Pacific grays.

 

The Makah proposal triggered protests from dozens of environmental and

animal-rights activists, with some fearing a Pacific Northwest hunt would

open the door to increased whaling elsewhere in the world.

 

At the Monaco meeting, the United States and Russia brokered a deal: The

Makah would get to take 20 whales through 2002 as part of a 620-whale quota

shared with the struggling Eskimos and the Chukchi people of Russia's

Chukotka Peninsula.

 

 

" There was a lot of drama, and it took a lot of arm-twisting, " said John

Tichotsky, an Alaska Pacific University professor who attended the meeting

on behalf of Russian and Alaskan Eskimos. " It was very much touch and go. "

 

U.S. officials meanwhile want to renew the existing Russian-Makah whale

agreement, and there likely will be protest.

 

Jim McClay, a New Zealand delegate to the commission, said his nation " as a

matter of general principal " would prefer that the Russian and Makah quotas

be put to separate votes. But he wouldn't disclose whether New Zealand would

try to make that happen. " Quite frankly I don't know what will happen. "

 

The Makah are hopeful that any opposition can be quelled. " It is important

to secure the quota, and we will, " said Michael Lawrence, a Makah tribal

council member attending the Shimonoseki meeting.

 

But the commission process is notoriously unpredictable, and U.S. government

officials remain cautious.

 

" What actually happens depends on the dynamics of the meeting, " said one

U.S. official who was at the Monaco IWC meeting.

 

Japan seeks support

 

Japanese delegates - eager to assert cultural ties to whaling among their

own coastal communities - supported the Makah quota. But so far, they've

been frustrated by their inability to gain commission approval for coastal

community whaling. Even the Makah quota was publicly criticized by Austria,

Australia, New Zealand and other nations skeptical of a request from a tribe

that hadn't hunted whales in 70 years.

 

The Japanese also have chafed at the attitude of many Western nations that

cannot accept any commercial hunts - no matter how healthy the stocks.

 

But Japan's aid to voting member nations may pay off.

 

For the first time in years, Japan may be able to claim a simple majority of

votes to gain IWC support for a " scientific " hunt that sanctions whaling

done in the name of research.

 

'Research' gains claimed

 

This year, the " research " effort is the largest ever, with 590 minke, 50

Byrde's, 50 Sei and 10 sperm whales expected to fall to Japanese harpoons.

 

Japanese officials say such " scientific " hunting has given them valuable

information about whale populations, and suggest that some more-abundant

species - such as minke - should be harvested to reduce competition for

endangered blue whales.

 

They also claim the research has documented the whale's huge consumption of

fish, and contend that killing whales may free up more fish for humans.

 

U.S. commission delegates dismiss the research program as an end run around

the commercial-whaling moratorium, with the Japanese using science as a

cover to kill whales for commercial markets. The commission has previously

rejected that request. Earlier this year, the Japanese announced that the

coastal communities will take the 50 whales to help advance science.

 

Japanese officials also angered conservationists with a proposal disclosed

in February to kill 50 Sei whales, which are listed by the U.S. government

under the Endangered Species Act.

 

" To hunt these Sei whales, it doesn't make any sense, " said Charlotte de

Fontaubert, oceans campaign coordinator for Greenpeace USA. " This has

brought the outrage over Japan to a new level. "

 

Hal Bernton can be reached at 206-464-2581 or hbernton.

 

 

 

2002 The Seattle Times Company

 

................

 

Tuesday, April 16, 2002 - 12:00 a.m. Pacific

 

 

Injunction is sought to halt tribe's spring hunt

 

By Hal Bernton

Seattle Times staff reporter

 

E-mail this article

 

Print this article

 

Search web archive

 

 

 

 

Opponents of Makah whaling went to federal court yesterday seeking an

injunction to block a possible spring hunt of Pacific gray whales.

 

The Fund for Animals, The Humane Society and other opposition groups filed

the motion in U.S. District Court, arguing that the hunt should not go

forward until the court has had time to rule on the merits of a lawsuit

filed last January challenging the hunt.

 

That lawsuit charges that the National Marine Fisheries Service violated the

National Environmental Policy Act by failing to fully study the effects of a

hunt that has been expanded to include areas within the Strait of Juan de

Fuca.

 

The new motion says an injunction is needed to prevent irreparable harm,

particularly to those gray whales that linger in the strait and would be

open to the hunt under new federal harvest rules.

 

" We are hopeful that they (the Makah) will be respectful of the process and

hold off on hunting whales until this (lawsuit) is resolved, " said Michael

Markarian of the Fund for Animals.

 

John Arum, an attorney for the Makahs, said tribal hunters have no intention

of voluntarily sitting out the spring hunt season. " We are not going to act

as if we're enjoined, unless we're enjoined,' Arum said. " We don't believe

their claims have any merit. "

 

National Marine Fisheries Service officials say they fully examined the

risks of the hunt in an environmental assessment that is now being

challenged in court. Brian Gorman, a spokesman for the fisheries service,

said the new motion for a preliminary injunction is " not unexpected. "

 

 

2002 The Seattle Times

 

 

 

 

Our grandchildren will ask us one day: Where were you during the Holocaust

of the animals? What did you do against these horrifying crimes? We won't be

able to offer the same excuse for the second time, that we didn't know.

 

 

--Dr. Helmut Kaplan

 

 

 

----------

----

Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. Click Here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...