Guest guest Posted February 2, 2001 Report Share Posted February 2, 2001 L'uranium contamine l'espace autour de la Terre. Amitiés. Bernard Blanc. Source: <A HREF= " http://ens.lycos.com/ens/feb2001/2001L-02-01-09.html " > http://ens.lycos.com/ens/feb2001/2001L-02-01-09.html</A> ======================================================== URANIUM CONTAMINATES SPACE AROUND EARTH SAN LUIS OBISPO, California, February 1, 2001 (ENS) - Minute particles of uranium are orbiting the Earth, say scientists from California Polytechnic State University. The researchers, led by Roger Grismore, came across the uranium almost by accident. In June 1991, a small space blanket made in California was placed over a glass instrument on the outside of the Russian space station Mir. The blanket, which consists of ten thin layers of aluminium and polyester, protected the instrument from solar radiation and showers of tiny meteorites. The blanket was removed in August 1995, returned to Earth and kept in a clean room for 16 months before Grismore and his team looked at it. They analyzed gamma radiation given off by the blanket, revealing energies characteristic of two radioactive isotopes, lead 214 and bismuth 214 - both decay products of uranium 238. To check that the blanket had not been contaminated in storage, the researchers also analyzed a similar blanket that had stayed back on Earth. It emitted less than a tenth as much radiation. " That is the thrill of science - seeing something that no one has seen before, " said Grismore. The scientists have three possible scenarios for the source of the uranium. It could have come from nuclear weapons tested in space in the 1960s, or from uranium powered satellites that have burnt up on reentry into the atmosphere. Or, an exploding supernova could have blasted the uranium into our solar system many thousands of years ago. More data is needed to establish the true origin, the scientists say. The study is published in the " Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, " volume 53, and in the February issue of the British magazine " New Scientist. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.