Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Interesting letter re LaDuke

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

>

>Dear Peninsula Daily News:

>

>The Green Party can be counted upon to support the vulnerable against

>the

>rapacity and self interest of the more powerful, right? Sadly, not the

>Green

>Party-USA , whose Vice Presidential candidate Winona LaDuke supports the

>

>indefensible slaughter of whales by the Makah (who treated those

>honorable

>Makah who oppose the slaughter, to a taste of the violence they have

>visited

>upon the whales). The Greens have turned their backs on the whales and

>on

>one of their strongest allies, animal advocates. As reported in the

>Peninsula Daily News, Keith Johnson, head of the Makah Whaling

>Commission,

>had never heard of the Greens, but welcomes their support of Makah

>violence.

>For those of us who do not share Johnson's ignorance of the party that

>was

>supposed to be a true alternative to government by and for the

>exploiters,

>witnessing the Green Party support the greed, lies, and cruelty of this

>hunt

>is a sad spectacle.

>

>The Makah have attempted to justify this slaughter because Native

>Americans

>were historically victims of genocidal crimes by Europeans, who stole

>their

>homes, decimated their culture, and took their lives without remorse.

>This

>is, indeed, a shameful part of our history and needs to be addressed and

>

>atoned for, but not by repeating these crimes against those entirely

>innocent of any complicity, the whales. The Makah Whaling Commission are

>a

>gang of bullies. Instead of aiming their justified rage at those who

>have

>exploited their people and learning a lesson in compassion from having

>been

>victims, they follow the example of their exploiters - exploit and kill

>those who cannot defend themselves. To deflect criticism of this

>hypocrisy,

>they label those dedicated to stopping the circle of violence as

>racists.

>Are the Makah so blinded by their plundering that they cannot see that

>if we

>were all transported back in time, the present animal advocates would

>have

>been the ones risking their lives to save, not just animals, but Native

>Americans, while the Makah Whaling Commission would have been Custer's

>allies, committing violence in the name of tradition? What does it

>matter if

>tradition is killing indigenous people in the name of white culture or

>killing whales in the name of Makah culture? The mind-set is the same,

>only

>the victims differ.

>

>Winona LaDuke has disgraced everything for which the Greens are supposed

>to

>stand. The Green presidential ticket is no longer a viable alternative

>to

>Gore/Bush. While LaDuke makes a distinction between commercial and ''

>traditional'' slaughter of whales, to the whales it does not matter if

>it is

>a Makah or a Japanese/Norwegian/Icelander who mercilessly kills her or

>her

>family. LaDuke also conveniently ignores the commercial whale killers

>backing of the Makah, as they know this will lead to a resumption of

>commercial killing of whales. LaDuke has stooped to lies (such as that

>the

>slaughter is IWC approved), despite the fact she is in possession of the

>

>facts, to support an action that cannot be defended.

>

>For whale killing to even be a topic of debate (let alone considered

>desirable) by ANY people in the 21st Century, let alone the Green Party,

>

>demonstrates how little humans have evolved.

>

>Since LaDuke supports tradition, ethics be damned, I can assume she also

>

>supports female circumcision, the killing of women for the crime of

>having

>been raped, the caste system in India, and the multitude of other

>atrocities

>committed in the name of tradition. To continue to cause suffering and

>death

>because it has always been done or, in the case of the Makah, to revive

>long

>dead moral crimes which we had hoped most humans had evolved beyond,

>cannot

>be justified on any grounds. Another LaDuke attempt at justification is

>that

>the whale killing is the ''law of the land''. Thank goodness for people

>with

>the intelligence and morals to distinguish between legal and ethical or

>we

>would still have slavery and child labor in this country.

>

>LaDuke said that Greens must tolerate diverse views or their numbers

>will

>not grow (apparently tolerating the views of those opposed to mindlessly

>

>causing suffering and death are not included here). Brent McMillan,

>facilitator of the Washington State Greens, stated there is no way he

>was

>going to let a little thing like massive cruelty against whales split up

>the

>unholy coalition between Greens and whale killing tribes. May I suggest

>that

>he also not let minor matters like racism, sexism, or corporate greed

>stand

>between the Greens and conservative Republicans. If the Greens choose to

>

>appeal to the lowest common denominator to assure support of their

>party,

>they should, logically, go all the way.

>

>To give higher value to a ''tradition'' (one not needed for survival) of

>one

>culture over the very lives of individuals of another maintains the

>present

>hierarchy responsible for all of our preventable woes: white men at the

>top,

>animals at the bottom, with the top and everyone in between victimizing

>the

>animals. By supporting the hunt, the Greens are propping up the unjust

>power

>pyramid, instead of using their energy and supposed intelligence and

>ethics

>to topple it. Maintaining that animals exist only to support the greed

>of

>those above the animals on the pyramid keeps the pyramid strong and

>assures

>the continuation of all the other power inequalities within the pyramid.

>

>Shame on Winona LaDuke and the Green Party for their complicity in

>politics

>as usual.

>

>Do you think LaDuke and McMillan would have had the audacity to tell

>Green

>supporters that even though the rights of women or blacks were excluded

>from

>the Green platform that we should be happy to agree on ''75 percent of

>the

>issues''? While the excluded group, the animals, don't vote, those of

>who

>are committed to justice DO vote, and the Greens have, with the support

>of

>this slaughter, lost all claim to being a morally superior alternative

>to

>politics as usual. John Hagelin, anybody?

>

>Susan Gordon

>New Jersey

>*****

>

 

_______________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...