Guest guest Posted July 4, 2000 Report Share Posted July 4, 2000 Tuesday, July 4 2:54 PM SGT ADELAIDE, Australia, July 4 (AFP) - Japan and its pro-whaling allies popped the champagne corks Tuesday after sinking a proposal to create a Pacific whale sanctuary. The Australia/New Zealand initiative failed to gain 75 percent of the vote needed at the International Whaling Commission's (IWC) annual talks here. Of the 35 nations in attendence, 18 voted in favour, 11 against and four abstained. Two nations were absent from the room at the crunch while six members had failed to pay their annual fees and did not turn up. The decision is seen as a major victory for Japan, which headed the push against the world's third whale sanctuary, and culminates a fierce batte of wits and verbal jibes. Tokyo, backed by Norway, based its arguement on the proposal being scientifically dubious and redundant as long as a moratorium remained on commercial whaling. And it clearly won the lobbying battle, persuading Denmark to join Norway, China, new member Guinea and six Caribbean nations in opposing the plan. Japan's Far Seas Fisheries Division deputy director Joji Morishita though was conciliatory rather than jubilant, aware that the proposal would be resubmitted to the IWC talks in London next year. " We are very happy, but it needs to be made clear that we don't oppose a sanctuary par se, " he said. " What we are saying is that it is not scientific to include all whales -- some whales, such as minke, are abundant. " Australia and New Zealand, with strong support from Britain and the United States, based their case on the economic benefits that would flow from whale watching rather than whale killing. They also said it was pointless protecting the feeding grounds of the great whales in the Southern Ocean sanctuary but not their breeding grounds and migratory routes in the Pacific. Australian Environment Minister Robert Hill put on a brave face, but was clearly disappointed. " I'm very disapponted but to get almost two thirds of the vote on the first occasion, to establish a very stong base of support is a sound basis to go forward to the next meeting (in London), " he told AFP. But he lashed out the bloc vote by the Caribbean nations. " The thing I find most difficult to understand is how a bloc vote fron the Caribbean can defeat the aspirations of a group of island states in the Pacific, " he said. " There seems to be something funamentally wrong with this. " Japan has angrily denied claims that it bought the Caribbean vote with hefty financial aid packages, although environmentalists turned up the heat Tuesday. " This vote should have been about conserving the world's remaining whale populations, not about short-term economic gain, " said Greenpeace's Sakiusa Qereqeretabua. " It is of deep concern that such an important conservation step can be blocked by the economic leverage of one country. " Morishita again dismissed the claims and instead threw doubt on statements by anti-whalers that the entire South Pacific favoured a sanctuary. " I know this isn't true, " he said. " I know four or five countries are opposed. " He refused to name them to save them " being put under pressure " . If the sanctuary had been given the go-ahead, its western border would have joined the existing Indian Ocean sanctuary and its southern reaches the Southern Ocean sanctuary -- effectively making almost all Southern Hemisphere oceans safe for whales. Blue, fin, right and humpback whales are considered the most severely depleted in the area after an estimated 1.5 million were slaughtered last century, although the IWC admits their status is " poorly known " . http://asia.dailynews./headlines/world/article.html?s=asia/headline s/000704/world/afp/Japan_sinks_Pacific_whale_sanctuary_proposal.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.