Guest guest Posted June 30, 2000 Report Share Posted June 30, 2000 - Masako Miyaji <masako_m_2000 ar-news <ar-news Thursday, June 29, 2000 8:50 PM (Intl)Controversy swells around whaling commission meeting > http://enn.com/news/enn-stories/2000/06/06292000/iwcmeeting_14307.asp > > ENN > > Controversy swells around whaling commission meeting > Thursday, June 29, 2000 > > By Margot Higgins > > The destiny of the world's fragile whale populations > will be on the line beginning Monday when the > International Whaling Commission opens its 52nd annual > meeting in Adelaide, Australia. > > At a press conference hosted Wednesday by the > International Fund for Animal Welfare, > conservationists > questioned how much power the commission has to > protect whales from commercial trade. > > " Signed in the 1940s, the Convention on Whaling is a > gentleman's agreement without enforcement provisions, " > said Karen Steuer, director of commercial exploitation > and trade of wild animals for the International Fund > for Animal Welfare. " That would be fine if Japan knew > how to act like a gentleman. " > > " Any major change to convention regulations requires a > three-fourths vote, " Steuer explained. " Japan has a > quarter block over the minority on most issues. That > creates an uphill hurdle when it comes to increasing > or decreasing protection for whales. " > > An association of more than 200 members from 40 > nations, the IWC was formed under the International > Convention for the Regulation of Whaling on Dec. 2, > 1946. In its role as the international authority for > the conservation of whales and management of whaling, > the commission banned commercial whaling in 1986. > > Several environmental groups, including the IFAW and > the Worldwide Fund for Nature, suggest that Japan has > used foreign aid to encourage developing nations to > join the IWC and vote in the country's favor. > > " Japan tends to focus on small-island developing > states with marine-focused economies and > marine-focused cultures, " Steuer said. Recent > inductees to the commission include St. Vincent, St. > Lucia and Dominica. > According to Steuer, all of the countries have sided > with Japan on whaling issues. > > Together, this group could block the passage of the > South Pacific Sanctuary proposed by the governments of > Australia and New Zealand. > > The sanctuary would safeguard reproduction areas of > whales already protected in their feeding grounds by > the Southern Ocean Sanctuary, which was adopted by the > IWC in 1994. Conservation groups say the sanctuary is > necessary to complement and improve the effectiveness > of the Southern Ocean Sanctuary in protecting > migratory whale species. > > One of the most contentious issues surrounding this > year's meeting lies beyond the vote of the commission. > > > Using a clause in the whaling convention that allows > states to grant special permits to themselves for > whaling for " scientific purposes, " Japan has skirted > the international moratorium on commercial whaling. > " When the clause was passed it was assumed that it > would be used in good faith, " Steuer said. " Japan has > stretched the rules. " > > Since 1987, Japan has caught more than 4,000 minke > whales. This year, in addition to its self-allocated > annual kill of 540 minke whales, the country proposes > to catch 50 Bryde's whales and 10 sperm whales for > scientific research. > > " This is commercialization under the guise of > science, " said Vassili Papastaurou, international > whaling team coordinator for IFAW. " DNA studies show > that there are various protected whale species on sale > in Japanese markets. " > > One claim made by Japan to justify its research is > that whales are in competition with humans for fish > and thus have an adverse effect on commercial > fisheries. > > Conservation groups don't buy that argument. Sperm > whales, for example, feed mostly on deepwater squid, a > species that is not consumed by humans, Papastaurou > pointed out. " If ever there was an animal not > responsible for depleting food human food sources, > it's the sperm whale. " > > Many members of the conservation community argue that > much of the scientific research could be conducted > without harming the animals. > > " I said last year that a so-called scientific whaling > program that had, by that time, killed nearly 3,000 > whales ... was not acceptacle, " said Jim McLay, > commissioner for the New Zealand delegation at the IWC > meeting in 1998. " Some 440 dead whales later I repeat > that comment. There is no need to kill whales in order > to research them. Adequate non-lethal means are > available. " > > The IWC has passed several resolutions criticizing > Japan's scientific whaling with no apparent effect, > Steuer said. > > Environmental groups claim the scientific research > sets the stage for Japan to resume commercial hunting. > " We could see (Japan) return to commercial whaling out > of the IWC over the next two to three years, " she > warned. > > Unless Japan chooses to withdraw its proposal to > expand scientific research, the request is likely to > pass. But conservation groups believe internal > pressure within Japan could sway the government. A > recent poll conducted by a British research center > revealed that only 11 percent of the population in > Japan supports commercial whaling. > > " We need to inform people about what they may not have > been aware of, " Steuer said. " The IWC's greatest power > is influencing public opinion. When 40 nations of the > world speak, it is very influential over > policy-makers. " > > Copyright 2000, Environmental News Network > > > > > > Get Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! > / > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.