Guest guest Posted June 2, 2000 Report Share Posted June 2, 2000 Here is a recent article regarding the bill. It like hundreds of other bills didn't get through the process this time and is currently in law committee. ======================================================= Bill would restore Missouri law against sex with animals By Eric Stern Post-Dispatch Jefferson City Bureau JEFFERSON CITY - Supporters of a legislative effort to ban sex with animals say that forging ahead with a bestiality bill is worth the barbs from late-night talk show hosts. Having no law that prohibits bestiality " makes us look like some kind of backward hillbilly state, " says the sponsor, Rep. Catherine Hanaway, R-Des Peres. Hanaway's bill was sparked by a story in the Riverfront Times, a free St. Louis weekly, last fall about a southwest Missouri man's sexual relationship with a horse. She said her constituents demanded that bestiality be outlawed. The House Criminal Law Committee held a hearing Wednesday on the bill, which would impose a maximum five-year prison sentence and $5,000 fine on people convicted of having sex with animals. Hanaway said she will try to add the proposal onto another bill during the legislative session. Having sex with animals was banned in Missouri until 1977, when lawmakers rewrote the state's sodomy laws and accidentally left out bestiality. No one took notice until the late George Willard of Carl Junction, Mo., published a book in 1994 about his fetish. That book led to some degree of notoriety for Missouri, including jokes about the Ozarks on " The Tonight Show. " It is unknown how widespread the practice may be in Missouri. At least one animal-rights group that supports the measure would rather see a bill about selling stolen pets become law. But bestiality has resonated with voters, stirring more letters, phone calls and e-mails from constituents than any other issue this year, Hanaway said. " We can't back away just because it's an embarrassing topic, " said Rep. Kate Hollingsworth, D-Imperial. Animal-rights organizations and conservative Christian groups don't find anything funny about it, either. " Once people get beyond the sensational aspect of this or the vulgarity, I think most Missourians would have a very difficult time trying to rationalize why this should be legal, " said Katherine McGowan, a Humane Society of Missouri spokeswoman in St. Louis. " Their bodies are not made to engage in this kind of activity. " Kerry Messer of Festus, president of the Missouri Family Network, asked, " Does there have to be a problem before we do something about this? " A psychiatrist with the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals in New York said between 3 percent and 5 percent of the population has the potential to be aroused by an animal, although very few act on it. The group supports the bill. The psychiatrist, Stephanie LaFarge, said some people she counsels believe they can have a harmless sexual relationship with an animal, likely a horse or large dog. She said thousands of Web sites about the topic are making more so-called zoophiles feel comfortable about their tendencies. But she said people who engage in violent sex with animals should be singled out because their behavior can lead to violence against people. " There is no consensual sex with an animal, " counters Sheila Rilenge, executive director of the Missouri Alliance for Animal Abuse Legislation in St. Louis. " They are unable to speak out loud about this abuse. " The bill is HB1658. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Mike Rolland ASAIRS Administrator Alternate email: rolland_mike Help stop sexual abuse of animals: http://welcome.to/legislation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.