Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Fw: Whale News

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

>

> BreachEnv

> Date:

> Mon, 31 Jan 2000 13:50:25 EST

> Subject:

> BMP GETS WHALES ON U.N. FORUM AGENDA

> To:

> undisclosed-recipients:;

>

>

> BMP GETS WHALES ON U.N. FORUM AGENDA

>

> --- 'Peoples Resolution' Could Be The Turning Point

> ---

>

> After years of effort and negotiation, Breach Marine

> Protection has finally got the great whales onto the

> United Nations Millennium Forum agenda.

> The breakthrough came after the UN decided to hold a

> Millennium Assembly in an effort to forge better links

> with its citizens.

>

> A proposal prepared by BMP to replace the current 1946

> International Convention on the Regulation of Whaling

> (ICRW) - with a Convention based on the Conservation

> of whales and other cetaceans - has been commended to

> the UN Secretary-general, Kofi Annan. BMP believes

> that the massive world-wide support for the now four

> year old 'People's Resolution on the Abolition of

> Inhumane Commercial Slaughter of Whales' was a

> deciding factor.

> For years, the International Whaling Commission (IWC)

> has declined to debate the 'People's Resolution',

> little wonder as Secretary Ray Gambell has

> consistently refused to place the 'Resolution' on IWC

> meetings schedule.

>

> " We are absolutely delighted that our Report has been

> recommended to the UN. " said David Smith, BMP's

> Campaigns Director and joint co-ordinator (with

> Andy Scollick) of the 'People's Resolution' from its

> inception. " So much hard work from many quarters has

> gone in to formulating both this Report and

> maintaining the 'People's Resolution'. This is great

> news for millions of people around the globe. "

>

> BMP's submissions are summarised in the UN Link 2000

> report 'A UN for the 21st Century' prepared by the

> UNGA-Link UK, and are placed alongside

> this Project's recommendations on Human Rights, the

> Elimination of Poverty, Peace, Security and

> Disarmament and Environmental Sustainability. The

> summary

> states:

>

> " A fundamental environmental fact is that human beings

> share the planet with other living creatures and that

> life exists in a web of mutual dependency. We are

> outraged by " man's inhumanity to man " , and some of us

> no less so by the inhumane slaughter of whales for

> commercial profit. Over ten million people

> from forty different countries signed the People's

> Resolution to abolish this slaughter of defenceless

> creatures in the natural world.

>

> Recommendation: The United Nations should heed the

> voices of those millions of people and promote

> an International Convention for the Conservation of

> Whales. "

>

> " If Mr. Annan accepts our proposals we have the

> concerned international community to thank; any

> victory for the whales will be their victory. " said

> Smith. " To all the individuals and organisations who

> have signed-on to the 'People's Resolution', BMP

> extents its heartfelt appreciation. This could be

> one hell of a blow for democracy. " he added.

>

> The International Whaling Commission (IWC) currently

> operates on the 1946 International Convention on the

> Regulation of Whales (ICRW). Note the word 'Re

> gulation'. This convention was formulated in the harsh

> days of post-second world war. Because the populations

> of all whale species had been so depleted by the greed

> of whalers - some to the point of extinction -

> regulation on the numbers slaughtered, the type of

> killing gear used etc. was vital.

>

> But the intent of the ICRW was to regulate whale

> 'stocks', so that more whales can be killed later.

> That is why the current world-wide Moratorium on

> whaling is just that, a moratorium (temporary halt),

> not a permanent ban.

>

> Under the 'rules' of the ICRW, the IWC can lift the

> Moratorium whenever it pleases. That Convention is now

> 54 years old, its 'rules' are not for the our

> world. Can you imagine a 21st Century disarmament

> convention being based on 1946 weaponry? It is also

> scientifically ignorant, e.g. in places the

> Convention refers to whales as 'fish'! The ICRW's

> interpretation body, the IWC, is riven with politics

> and self interest, consequently its rulings

> have little to do with whales.

>

> The Breach Marine Protection Report calls on the

> United Nations to replace the ICRW with an ICCC, an

> International Convention on the Conservation

> of Cetaceans.

>

> contact:

>

> Breach Marine Protection

> 3, St John's Street

> Goole

> East Yorkshire

> DN14 5QL

>

> Tele./Fax: +44 (0)1405 769375

> Mobile: 0973 898282

> e-mail: BreachEnv

>

> 'People's Resolution on the Abolition of Inhumane

> Commercial Slaughter of Whales':

> http://www.Breach.org (please note our new website

> location).

>

> United Nations: http://www.un.org

>

> International Whaling Commission:

> http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/iwcoffice/

>

>

>

>

> Talk to your friends online with Messenger.

> http://im.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...