Guest guest Posted September 5, 2003 Report Share Posted September 5, 2003 Had a question so just wanted to clarify, the information below is from the Dairy Industry -- they asked their members to vote " no " on the bill... We need to get our voices to our legislators asking for a " YES " on the bill! So, do the opposite of what the dairy farmers are asking --- Contact your Assemblymember and ask for a YES vote on SB 700 and SB 707. To find the names of your State Assembly Member and State Senator, call (916)319-2856, (916)445-4251, or your County Registrar of Voter or look in front of your local phone book under California Assembly and California Senate. You can also visit http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/yourleg.html. ================================================== NOTE: BELOW Comments are from the dairy industry! ================================================== Western United Dairymen Weekly News Update Aug. 29, 2003 http://www.westernuniteddairymen.com/article.php? sid=319 FLOREZ AIR BILLS MOVE TO ASSEMBLY FLOOR After failing to move out of committee last week, SB 700, authored by Sen. Dean Florez (D-Shafter), was brought back for reconsideration. SB 700 was the subject of long marathon meetings this week between supporters and opponents in an effort to reach a compromise between the senator and groups representing Central Valley agriculture. By noon Friday, SB 700 and another Florez bill SB 707, passed thanks to four last-minute appointments by the speaker. SB 700 would rescind agriculture's exemption from reporting requirements of the federal 1972 Clean Air Act as amended in 1990. That portion of SB 700 is not in dispute by agricultural interests: without rescinding the exemption for agriculture, the state faces the threat of the loss of federal highway funds by the end of the year. Sanctions could also affect new commercial construction in the state, forcing businesses to establish offsets for additional pollutants that regulators estimate will be generated by the project. The threat of federal sanctions has been triggered by court action declaring the state's agricultural exemption to be illegal. The Florez bill, however, goes far beyond the federal requirements by including an environmental shopping list of additional requirements. As passed today, the bill would regulate every agricultural operation, activity, confined animal facility, and certain internal combustion engines on farms and ranches statewide. Every place an animal is confined for feeding purposes would be defined as an agricultural stationary source of air pollution no matter what level of air emissions can be attributed to the operation. Instead of allowing local air districts to make decisions that are appropriate for their region, the bill would set statewide mandates. Without the support of sound science - - or even any science - - and without the support of EPA, SB 700 will require California agriculture to employ measures to control PM-2.5 emissions. Should SB 700 pass, every dairy of any size will be required to inventory, record, and report the emissions of all pollutants produced from their operations. After many long hours of good-faith negotiations, agricultural groups were, in the end, unable to move SB 700 away from its original language. " All we have asked for is that California agriculture be subject to the same regulations as other similar areas in the nation, " said Paul Martin, WUD environmental services coordinator. SB 707, the second Florez bill to pass out of the Assembly Appropriations Committee on Friday, sets limits on urban and agricultural growth by creating a 3-mile buffer around each dairy in the state. Dairies would be unable to build or modify facilities within the buffer zone around cities, towns, census areas with more than 5,000 inhabitants, or schools. It is uncertain whether these urban structures, including schools, would be allowed to be constructed within three miles of an existing dairy. A long list of county boards of supervisors have voiced their strong opposition to this effort to move the responsibility for county planning decisions to the circus of state legislative " debate " . " Florez and his comrades have driven a stake through the heart of the agricultural economy that is the basis for what should be California's strong, healthy international economy, the envy of the nation and the world, " said Michael Marsh, CEO of Western United Dairymen. " Florez has dismissed the entire scientific community that has been at work to develop real improvements in air quality in our state, " he added. A broad coalition of agricultural groups, including Western United Dairymen and Milk Producers Council, has been working to develop a reasonable compromise that would meet the requirements of the clean air act without destroying California's agricultural economy. According to Gary Conover, WUD's director of government relations, " We had a strong show of support from farm families in the Capitol today. Their efforts are appreciated, and while we lost this round, the work of everyone who has had a part in defending the viability of California agriculture has opened the eyes of many urban legislators. We can't give up3/4eventually they will get it. " Conover has been working tirelessly to fix both bills since last spring. The two bills face a vote of the full State Assembly, perhaps as early as Thursday, September 4. Every dairy producer in California, not just members of Western United Dairymen and Milk Producers Council, needs to become involved in the effort to kill these bills in the Assembly. Contact you Assemblymember and ask for a NO vote on SB 700 and SB 707. Contact Western United Dairymen at (209) 527-6453 or (800) 523-4868 if you need help to find contact information for your representative in the Assembly. --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.