Guest guest Posted April 5, 2004 Report Share Posted April 5, 2004 Come-on jeff, Your reaction seems biased and off-base, not the article. The author does not offer second or third hand stories, as you say, but first hand experience and first hand observation. Nutritional deficiencies seem to me to be common for raw-vegans--even Gabriel Cousen's recommends B-12 supplementation! We need to be realistic, not idealistic, especially when we preach to others THE WAY as if we truly can know THE WAY for every one all the time. As a raw food educator, I know exactly what the author is speaking of. For myself, it has taken a lot of courage to stand up infront of my classes and tell everyone (who have come looking for THE WAY) that I am not always 100% raw and vegan. Yet, teachers speaking the truth seems to be more useful because it alleviates the sense of failure that many of us have felt when we haven't been able to stick to THE WAY all the time. And, by the way, as someone who has spent alot of time with other raw foods educators, I have witnessed exactly what the author reported: educators preaching a purism, and living anything but! So, I would say, let's be REAL! and admit that there are challenges, that no one diet works for everyone all the time, and not be afraid to share our challenges as well as our successes. We might just learn how to do better, and learn that the road to superior health and proper nutrition is a process, not blind adherence to a dogma. Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions./design_giveaway/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2004 Report Share Posted April 5, 2004 Bruce, Thanks for your post. You seem to have missed my point. Even though teachers/instructors may not be living the ideal diet, that does not mean that they do not have a right to teach what they understand to be a more ideal diet. You are an example of that, as you say you do not always follow a 100% diet. I've heard rumors (2nd hand info, such as the article) that some of the raw vegan teachers have been seen at fast food restaurants ordering non-vegan foods. Again, that does not mean that they should not be teaching a concept such as raw vegan foods (IMO). Something else to consider - As I referred in my previous email, if someone is not eating an ideal diet, then that may be the reason they are not experiencing ideal health. If they are consuming animal flesh and theorize that we doing so may keep them from ideal health, then that may explain their health issues. Does that mean they should not teach a raw vegan (mono) diet? Granted, if a raw vegan diet, itself, was unhealthy, then I believe people knowing that should not teach it. But if their food addictions and cravings are keeping them from what they belive is their ideal diet, that may mean they are weak, but, IMO, that does not mean they should not continue teaching what they believe to be an ideal diet. Dr. Graham may thrive on his diet. He promotes a raw mono vegan diet. I have seen him combine more than one food at one time. That does not mean that he should not teach raw mono vegan. Regarding deficiencies, I'd like to hear more details about them, more facts. The recent email did not help me at all with learning more about them. If you have more information, please share them, don't just put me down for commenting on this email list. Thanks, Jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 6, 2004 Report Share Posted April 6, 2004 Hi Jeff, I didn't read the article or Bruce message, but I want to reply on your message. >> some of the raw vegan teachers have been seen at >> fast food restaurants ordering non-vegan foods. I hope they were ordering that not for themselves, otherwise I am considering taking money from the students for their lessons will be cheating or fraud. >> If they are consuming animal flesh >> and theorize that we doing so may keep them from >> ideal health, then that may explain their health issues. Jeff, I am vegetarian, but not agree with that statement. Consuming animal flesh will not keep you from ideal health. It's proved by travelers and researches. People who live more than 100 years old and are healthy, they are not vegetarians, you can read about it in Paul Bragg books, he was traveling in many countries, looking for secrets to be healthy. My Chinese coworker had a grandfather who died recently at the age 104 and his main food was boiled rice and baked fish. The guy was healthy, walking every morning, always happy and smile. But one day he said : It's my time, he dressed up in suit went to bed and died. I don't know how much you are familiar with metaphysics concepts, but this thought from Ayuverda is describing what I believe: Causes of disease: " perversity of mind " is the ultimate cause of every disease (negative thoughts). The physical toxins that occur are a symptom, not the actual cause, of most disease. love and blessings, viola Jeff Rogers <jeff wrote: Bruce, Thanks for your post. You seem to have missed my point. Even though teachers/instructors may not be living the ideal diet, that does not mean that they do not have a right to teach what they understand to be a more ideal diet. You are an example of that, as you say you do not always follow a 100% diet. I've heard rumors (2nd hand info, such as the article) that some of the raw vegan teachers have been seen at fast food restaurants ordering non-vegan foods. Again, that does not mean that they should not be teaching a concept such as raw vegan foods (IMO). Something else to consider - As I referred in my previous email, if someone is not eating an ideal diet, then that may be the reason they are not experiencing ideal health. If they are consuming animal flesh and theorize that we doing so may keep them from ideal health, then that may explain their health issues. Does that mean they should not teach a raw vegan (mono) diet? Granted, if a raw vegan diet, itself, was unhealthy, then I believe people knowing that should not teach it. But if their food addictions and cravings are keeping them from what they belive is their ideal diet, that may mean they are weak, but, IMO, that does not mean they should not continue teaching what they believe to be an ideal diet. Dr. Graham may thrive on his diet. He promotes a raw mono vegan diet. I have seen him combine more than one food at one time. That does not mean that he should not teach raw mono vegan. Regarding deficiencies, I'd like to hear more details about them, more facts. The recent email did not help me at all with learning more about them. If you have more information, please share them, don't just put me down for commenting on this email list. Thanks, Jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.