Guest guest Posted March 9, 2003 Report Share Posted March 9, 2003 Note: forwarded message attached. Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes./ Bob Avery --------- Forwarded message ---------- Thursday, March 06, 2003 THE ATOMIC MEDIA: AN INTERVIEW WITH ELLIS MEDAVOY MARCH 6. Since I ran my stories on AIDS and the depopulation agenda, readers have expressed an interest in hearing more from Ellis Medavoy, a retired propaganda operative who was my source for some of that material. So here is an interview with Ellis on the subject of the media and how information is distorted in a particular way to derail justice. Q: You occasionally use the term " atomic media. " What do you mean by that? A: I'm talking about how stories are presented as if each one exists in a vacuum by itself. As if each story is a sole atom floating in nothing. Q: You mean stories aren't connected to one another. A: Right. Sometimes they are, but not to the degree where an entire institution is seriously threatened. Q: What do you mean, seriously threatened? A: That the institution itself could go down, could actually cease to exist. Most people don't think about the fact that the overwhelming number of modern institutions---the really big ones---never become extinct. At worst they take a hit and are re-organized. But why shouldn't many of them just disappear in a storm of revelation? There are many reasons why this doesn't happen, but one is, the media present stories on these institutions one at a time---how often do you really read a compelling piece that sums up all the crimes of a major, major institution? Almost never. You know, traditionally the press has taken the lead on exposing these multiple crimes, and then you would sometimes get major Congressional hearings in the aftermath. But what is the last Congressional hearing that actually took a gigantic institution to task in a serious way? Q: Enron? A: Enron will be reorganized so that new giants swallow up pieces of the old giant. No, I would say that the Church hearings of the 1970s, on the CIA, were the last major hearings that even tried---however impotently---to really put the wood to a major institution. Q: Can you give me an example of a press story that could be written which would actually disturb people greatly, vis-à-vis a major institution? A: Okay---just very briefly---July 1, 1961, Saskatchewan, Canada. Huge numbers of doctors went on strike. For 23 days. The overall mortality rate among the population during that time made a steep decline. 1976, Bogota, Colombia. Doctors went on strike for 52 days. The death rate dropped 35 percent. Same year, 1976, a doctors' strike in Los Angeles. 18 percent drop in mortality. 1973, Israel. A 30 day doctors' strike. Mortality rate dove by 50 percent. 2000, Israel. Another doctors' strike. Funeral homes reported big drops in business. Meir Adler, who runs the Shamgar Funeral Parlour that buries a lot of Jerusalem residents, tells the Jerusalem Post, " There definitely is a connection between the doctors' sanctions and fewer deaths. We saw the same thing in 1983 when the Israel Medical Association applied sanctions [work stoppage] for four and a half months. " Now, the so-called experts try to explain this away with various absurd arguments. But they can't. Q: So--- A: So I'm saying, if media wanted to take these and other similar stories and put them together and run a whole series on this, and if the wire services joined in, if there was enough coverage and enough quoted outcry, you would BEGIN to see the tip of the iceberg crack, just a little. It would be a start. If there were a really good anti-medical PR firm---which there isn't, and why the hell NOT?---that firm could pick up this little ball and run with it. See? Find a doctor somewhere who works at a prestigious university---and you can find them if you look---and get a lead quote from him---hell, arrange a whole conference just so he can say the words, " When doctors don't work, the death rate goes way down. " Then you come in behind that with these examples, and you've got a toenail in the door. But the major media won't give that to you on their own. You have to fight for it. Q: You could do the same thing with suppressed cancer treatments. A: Sure. The book you keep touting, Politics in Healing, by Dan Haley, a former elected politician in New York---that's a fantastic piece of work. You've got ten or so legitimate cancer treatments described in there that have been buried by the medical cartel. You could go to little towns and find people who are still alive because they got one of those treatments. Lead with that, and come in behind it with another tale that involved a cure from another suppressed modality---the possibilities are endless. Go up against the media and get stories you want planted in the press. I'm not saying this would easy---but you'd be surprised at the long-term effect. Q: Vaccines. A: Right. Gannett did a whole series on vaccines some years ago. Very good. But no more. Now all you get is the atomic thing. Stories here and there, unconnected. Imagine what you could really do. Tie in all the vaccines together. Q: You once told me you did propaganda work on behalf of vaccines in the Third World. A: S**t, there were all sorts of PR people involved. The " miracle of the smallpox vaccine campaign in Africa. " What a load. They never tracked the vaccine recipients long-term to see what really happened to them. They asserted that smallpox itself was the only real side-effect when the vaccine went wrong. The truth is, the vaccine can cause all sorts of very bad effects. But that was ignored. I could tell you things. And they know! They know that when you give a vaccine like smallpox to people whose immune systems are already suppressed, you get all sorts of horrible effects, and some of those take awhile to become obvious. Q: So--- A: Listen, let me point out one thing I think you missed about a London Times piece you often refer to. Q: May 11, 1987? A: Yeah, front page. The article that said there was a correlation between numbers of smallpox vaccinations given in Third World countries and ensuing AIDS cases. They did get their statistics screwed up in that piece, but--- Q: And the AP science desk in New York refused to even send that story out on the wire to US press outlets. A: I know, I know. But there were several reasons why AP buried it. And one of those reasons was, the article had a quote in it from Robert Gallo. Q: I remember. A: Yeah, but maybe you overlooked it as a major reason WHY AP buried the story. Gallo said that he had warned before about giving vaccines like smallpox to populations that were already extremely immune suppressed, because the effects could be devastating. Try to find Gallo saying that to an American newspaper---try to find it. I can't. That little gem was covered over with a ton of silence. Q: Yes, I see what you're saying. A: People have to realize that when one of these monster vaccine campaigns is launched, there are PR people---ALWAYS---working behind the scenes to make sure all the press reports are sticking to the party line. They don't just leave these things up to chance. Q: But sometimes the PR people fail. A: It happens, like in the case of the anthrax scare in the US. The PR propaganda people were doing a very bad job---they were hindered by the high-profile nature of the scare. Too many doctors just started talking to the press, and so you got a variety of opinion as to how serious or un-serious it all was and who was behind it. And the Internet weighed in and influenced the story too. Q: But normally--- A: You've got propaganda people influencing the press to print THIS or not print THAT. The World Health Organization, which is in charge of some of the PR for the vaccine campaigns---their in-house propagandists---they're mostly morons. I wouldn't hire them to publicize a lawn party. They are good at one thing only: saying it's all fine, everything is going well. And they're also pretty good at stalling. " The report will be out next year. " Running the PR on these vaccine campaigns, you do, in fact, see---if you look---outside PR people who are working their press contacts and working their " reliable sources' who in turn talk to reporters and feed them a better brand of sophisticated baloney. Q: And the upshot is, lots of people in the Third World are getting hammered by vaccines and very few people know about it. A: Hammered is the right word. Q: Is this whole aspect of the medical cartel---the huge vaccine campaigns in the Third World--- A: In a sense, it's basically a continuation of Rockefeller Medicine---you know, in the early days, Rockefeller wanted to develop medicines for people in the Third World SO THEY COULD WORK WITHOUT DYING. So they could continue to perform labor on big corporate projects. It had nothing to do with basic health. It had to do with propping up the indigenous labor force. Q: " We have to find a way to enable the slaves to keep up the long hours. " A: You've got it. Q: But if these vaccine campaigns really disable and maim and kill so many people in the long run, then the " Rockefeller paradigm " is, in its own terms, a failure. It doesn't achieve their desired goal. A: Two things to say about that. There are overwhelming numbers of doctors and researchers who believe that vaccines are effective. But the more important thing to say is, Rockefeller people developed another agenda over time, an agenda which is taking precedence. Q: Depopulation. A: Yes. Q: Then how will giant corporations in the future obtain the necessary slave labor to do work in the Third World? A: I could say a lot about that, but the basic answer is automation. They want depopulated virgin land and virgin resources, first and foremost. They' re confident they can figure out how to work the land with machines in the next fifty years. And, as we've discussed before, they intend to RE-SEED those depopulated areas with people [ " support staff " ] from America and other industrialized nations---people who are indoctrinated to believe in the vision of a new world. A global economy ENTIRELY run by the biggest corporations. Q: And ultimately, these corporations will have to accommodate themselves to a limited consumer base, globally speaking, in the wake of increasing depopulation. A: Yes. But think of the trade-off. Limited consumer base in return for being COMPLETE AND UTTER KINGS of the world economy. Kings who are backed up by a global army. It's really what we have now, except if their vision comes true, the degree of control will be much greater. Absolute. Q: And HIV, the virus that doesn't cause anything, figures into this as? A: A smokescreen to conceal depopulation launched by other means. JON RAPPOPORT www.stratiawire.com I'm writing this newsletter to give you 20 years of research, plus new research, on the groups that run this planet. Nothing less. The Newsletter is a kind of deep background that is impossible to find anywhere on or off the Web. I welcome you to the future of real news and real information. Jon Rappoport As a reader of STRATIAwire, you will notice that I refer to " the cartels. " What are they? What have they done? What are they doing now? What will they do to increase their control of planet Earth? Cartel operations, cartel structure, and most important, the pervasive and various mind-control actions these cartels take to literally manufacture reality for the populations of this world. Over the past two decades, I have had direct access to sources within the cartels. I have also done hundreds of interviews with other quite reliable sources, and I have combed journals to find a network of clues leading to an ever-widening portrait of the cartels. Find out more and today! ______________ Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today Only $9.95 per month! Visit www.juno.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.