Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

practices of media distortion of information to derail justice-only for the enlightened rawbie

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Note: forwarded message attached.

 

 

 

 

Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more

http://taxes./

 

 

Bob Avery

 

--------- Forwarded message ----------

 

 

Thursday, March 06, 2003

 

 

THE ATOMIC MEDIA: AN INTERVIEW WITH ELLIS MEDAVOY

 

MARCH 6. Since I ran my stories on AIDS and the depopulation agenda,

readers

have expressed an interest in hearing more from Ellis Medavoy, a retired

propaganda operative who was my source for some of that material.

 

So here is an interview with Ellis on the subject of the media and how

information is distorted in a particular way to derail justice.

 

 

Q: You occasionally use the term " atomic media. " What do you mean by

that?

 

A: I'm talking about how stories are presented as if each one exists in a

vacuum by itself. As if each story is a sole atom floating in nothing.

 

Q: You mean stories aren't connected to one another.

 

A: Right. Sometimes they are, but not to the degree where an entire

institution is seriously threatened.

 

Q: What do you mean, seriously threatened?

 

A: That the institution itself could go down, could actually cease to

exist.

Most people don't think about the fact that the overwhelming number of

modern institutions---the really big ones---never become extinct. At

worst

they take a hit and are re-organized. But why shouldn't many of them just

disappear in a storm of revelation? There are many reasons why this

doesn't

happen, but one is, the media present stories on these institutions one

at a

time---how often do you really read a compelling piece that sums up all

the

crimes of a major, major institution? Almost never. You know,

traditionally

the press has taken the lead on exposing these multiple crimes, and then

you

would sometimes get major Congressional hearings in the aftermath. But

what

is the last Congressional hearing that actually took a gigantic

institution

to task in a serious way?

 

Q: Enron?

 

A: Enron will be reorganized so that new giants swallow up pieces of the

old

giant. No, I would say that the Church hearings of the 1970s, on the CIA,

were the last major hearings that even tried---however impotently---to

really put the wood to a major institution.

 

Q: Can you give me an example of a press story that could be written

which

would actually disturb people greatly, vis-à-vis a major institution?

 

A: Okay---just very briefly---July 1, 1961, Saskatchewan, Canada. Huge

numbers of doctors went on strike. For 23 days. The overall mortality

rate

among the population during that time made a steep decline. 1976, Bogota,

Colombia. Doctors went on strike for 52 days. The death rate dropped 35

percent. Same year, 1976, a doctors' strike in Los Angeles. 18 percent

drop

in mortality. 1973, Israel. A 30 day doctors' strike. Mortality rate dove

by

50 percent. 2000, Israel. Another doctors' strike. Funeral homes reported

big drops in business. Meir Adler, who runs the Shamgar Funeral Parlour

that

buries a lot of Jerusalem residents, tells the Jerusalem Post, " There

definitely is a connection between the doctors' sanctions and

fewer

deaths. We saw the same thing in 1983 when the Israel Medical Association

applied sanctions [work stoppage] for four and a half months. " Now, the

so-called experts try to explain this away with various absurd arguments.

But they can't.

Q: So---

A: So I'm saying, if media wanted to take these and other similar stories

and put them together and run a whole series on this, and if the wire

services joined in, if there was enough coverage and enough quoted

outcry,

you would BEGIN to see the tip of the iceberg crack, just a little. It

would

be a start. If there were a really good anti-medical PR firm---which

there

isn't, and why the hell NOT?---that firm could pick up this little ball

and

run with it. See? Find a doctor somewhere who works at a prestigious

university---and you can find them if you look---and get a lead quote

from

him---hell, arrange a whole conference just so he can say the words,

" When

doctors don't work, the death rate goes way down. " Then you come in

behind

that with these examples, and you've got a toenail in the door. But the

major media won't give that to you on their own. You have to fight for

it.

Q: You could do the same thing with suppressed cancer treatments.

A: Sure. The book you keep touting, Politics in Healing, by Dan Haley, a

former elected politician in New York---that's a fantastic piece of work.

You've got ten or so legitimate cancer treatments described in there that

have been buried by the medical cartel. You could go to little towns and

find people who are still alive because they got one of those treatments.

Lead with that, and come in behind it with another tale that involved a

cure

from another suppressed modality---the possibilities are endless. Go up

against the media and get stories you want planted in the press. I'm not

saying this would easy---but you'd be surprised at the long-term effect.

Q: Vaccines.

A: Right. Gannett did a whole series on vaccines some years ago. Very

good.

But no more. Now all you get is the atomic thing. Stories here and there,

unconnected. Imagine what you could really do. Tie in all the vaccines

together.

Q: You once told me you did propaganda work on behalf of vaccines in the

Third World.

A: S**t, there were all sorts of PR people involved. The " miracle of the

smallpox vaccine campaign in Africa. " What a load. They never tracked the

vaccine recipients long-term to see what really happened to them. They

asserted that smallpox itself was the only real side-effect when the

vaccine

went wrong. The truth is, the vaccine can cause all sorts of very bad

effects. But that was ignored. I could tell you things. And they know!

They

know that when you give a vaccine like smallpox to people whose immune

systems are already suppressed, you get all sorts of horrible effects,

and

some of those take awhile to become obvious.

Q: So---

A: Listen, let me point out one thing I think you missed about a London

Times piece you often refer to.

Q: May 11, 1987?

A: Yeah, front page. The article that said there was a correlation

between

numbers of smallpox vaccinations given in Third World countries and

ensuing

AIDS cases. They did get their statistics screwed up in that piece,

but---

Q: And the AP science desk in New York refused to even send that story

out

on the wire to US press outlets.

A: I know, I know. But there were several reasons why AP buried it. And

one

of those reasons was, the article had a quote in it from Robert Gallo.

Q: I remember.

A: Yeah, but maybe you overlooked it as a major reason WHY AP buried the

story. Gallo said that he had warned before about giving vaccines like

smallpox to populations that were already extremely immune suppressed,

because the effects could be devastating. Try to find Gallo saying that

to

an American newspaper---try to find it. I can't. That little gem was

covered

over with a ton of silence.

Q: Yes, I see what you're saying.

A: People have to realize that when one of these monster vaccine

campaigns

is launched, there are PR people---ALWAYS---working behind the scenes to

make sure all the press reports are sticking to the party line. They

don't

just leave these things up to chance.

Q: But sometimes the PR people fail.

A: It happens, like in the case of the anthrax scare in the US. The PR

propaganda people were doing a very bad job---they were hindered by the

high-profile nature of the scare. Too many doctors just started talking

to

the press, and so you got a variety of opinion as to how serious or

un-serious it all was and who was behind it. And the Internet weighed in

and

influenced the story too.

Q: But normally---

A: You've got propaganda people influencing the press to print THIS or

not

print THAT. The World Health Organization, which is in charge of some of

the

PR for the vaccine campaigns---their in-house propagandists---they're

mostly

morons. I wouldn't hire them to publicize a lawn party. They are good at

one

thing only: saying it's all fine, everything is going well. And they're

also

pretty good at stalling. " The report will be out next year. " Running the

PR

on these vaccine campaigns, you do, in fact, see---if you look---outside

PR

people who are working their press contacts and working their " reliable

sources' who in turn talk to reporters and feed them a better brand of

sophisticated baloney.

Q: And the upshot is, lots of people in the Third World are getting

hammered

by vaccines and very few people know about it.

A: Hammered is the right word.

Q: Is this whole aspect of the medical cartel---the huge vaccine

campaigns

in the Third World---

A: In a sense, it's basically a continuation of Rockefeller

Medicine---you

know, in the early days, Rockefeller wanted to develop medicines for

people

in the Third World SO THEY COULD WORK WITHOUT DYING. So they could

continue

to perform labor on big corporate projects. It had nothing to do with

basic

health. It had to do with propping up the indigenous labor force.

Q: " We have to find a way to enable the slaves to keep up the long

hours. "

A: You've got it.

Q: But if these vaccine campaigns really disable and maim and kill so

many

people in the long run, then the " Rockefeller paradigm " is, in its own

terms, a failure. It doesn't achieve their desired goal.

A: Two things to say about that. There are overwhelming numbers of

doctors

and researchers who believe that vaccines are effective. But the more

important thing to say is, Rockefeller people developed another agenda

over

time, an agenda which is taking precedence.

Q: Depopulation.

A: Yes.

Q: Then how will giant corporations in the future obtain the necessary

slave

labor to do work in the Third World?

A: I could say a lot about that, but the basic answer is automation. They

want depopulated virgin land and virgin resources, first and foremost.

They'

re confident they can figure out how to work the land with machines in

the

next fifty years. And, as we've discussed before, they intend to RE-SEED

those depopulated areas with people [ " support staff " ] from America and

other

industrialized nations---people who are indoctrinated to believe in the

vision of a new world. A global economy ENTIRELY run by the biggest

corporations.

Q: And ultimately, these corporations will have to accommodate themselves

to

a limited consumer base, globally speaking, in the wake of increasing

depopulation.

A: Yes. But think of the trade-off. Limited consumer base in return for

being COMPLETE AND UTTER KINGS of the world economy. Kings who are backed

up

by a global army. It's really what we have now, except if their vision

comes

true, the degree of control will be much greater. Absolute.

Q: And HIV, the virus that doesn't cause anything, figures into this as?

A: A smokescreen to conceal depopulation launched by other means.

JON RAPPOPORT www.stratiawire.com

I'm writing this newsletter to give you 20 years of research, plus new

research, on the groups that run this planet.

Nothing less.

The Newsletter is a kind of deep background that is impossible to find

anywhere on or off the Web. I welcome you to the future of real news and

real information.

Jon Rappoport

As a reader of STRATIAwire, you will notice that I refer to " the

cartels. "

What are they? What have they done? What are they doing now? What will

they

do to increase their control of planet Earth?

Cartel operations, cartel structure, and most important, the pervasive

and

various mind-control actions these cartels take to literally manufacture

reality for the populations of this world.

Over the past two decades, I have had direct access to sources within the

cartels. I have also done hundreds of interviews with other quite

reliable

sources, and I have combed journals to find a network of clues leading to

an

ever-widening portrait of the cartels.

Find out more and today!

______________

Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today

Only $9.95 per month!

Visit www.juno.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...