AIDS issue continues

[Guest guest]

Bridgitte,

 

that is not my statement. That is something that AIDS researchers

such as Mr. Duesberg have been questioning and I'm merely quoting.

Like it was in the beginning, AIDS was told only to be spreading

amongst these minority groups, but not affecting the larger public

until recently. This is not making sense for a virus, since a virus

doesn't choose its victims by what minority they belong to.

 

I think you really are making too big an issue out of a small piece

of text.

 

/Mimi

 

rawfood , " Bridgitte " <syndactylcat> wrote:

> Just so you all get it, I was responding DIRECTLY to this quote by

> Mimi:

>

> " Why would a virus (like HIV) only spread amongst the homosexuals

> or drug addicts? "

>

> That is a false statement. It may have been true 25 years ago, but

> it's not now.

>

> Bridgitte

[Guest guest]

Hi Mimi,

 

I was only trying to clarify for people what I was responding to.

The quotes were intended to show that it was from your post. I

didn't see in where you noted that the statement wasn't your own

thought, but I'll re-read the original post. No harm intended.

 

 

> I think you really are making too big an issue out of a small piece

> of text.

 

Things have been clarified enough for me by your apology that I'm not

making an issue out of it anymore at all, but people keep

responding. Anything I've posted since rejoining the group has't

been directed toward you, just responses to various other posts.

 

I'm hoping that if this thread continues, that we can stick to the

germ theory aspect, and drop all the other crap around it. I think

we've all made our opinions clear at this point, and there's no point

in beating a dead horse. My apologies for contributing to this

getting out of control.

 

Bridgitte