Guest guest Posted January 12, 2003 Report Share Posted January 12, 2003 Immunity Herbert M Shelton Dr Shelton's Hygienic Review What is " immunity " ? As ordinarily defined it amounts to an abrogation of the law of cause and effect. Men are said to be " immune, " or not, to certain microbes or to certain parasites, but there seems to be no clear conception of what this " immunity " consists, nor of its basis. Natural " immunity, " therefore, is little regarded while empirical tamperings with the body are resorted to in a vain endeavor to establish artificial " immunity. " Microbes and parasites are, at most only the " last straw " laid upon the back of an already overloaded camel. How foolish to seek to immunize against the last straw, and ignore all the preceding straws that produced the susceptibility. Vaccinia is said to be a milder disease than smallpox, a " lesser evil " that is alleged to immunize against smallpox. The folly of attempting to " immunize " the body against evils to which it has otherwise rendered itself susceptible, by the introduction therein, of " lesser evils " should be apparent to all. Well might we ask: " Is there some dismal fate overhanging us, and is there no degree of legitimacy that will secure us from bacterial and parasitic invasion? " Does susceptibility exist without the previous operation of definite and ascertainable causes? Must we ignore law and order and depend upon the Medicine Man's Magic? " " Physiologically, " says Reinheimer, " there is but one kind of solvency, and nothing that in any way lessens any part of it can increase the true " immunity " of the system. In other words, an existing susceptibility can be immunized only by avoidance or removal of its causes, never by artificially importing elements of the lesser evil type. Only in respect of total stability can a system be immunized in accordance with the principle of cause and effect. " The body is able to defend itself and does not require protection from the pus and serum vats. How true is the statement: " Providence protects organisms in so far as they protect themselves, and in this sense it is true that unto him that hath shall be given. " Retention of susceptibility is by no means a necessity, it is rather a lapse, a disease. " Immunity " is physiological integrity and depends upon integrity of behavior. Huxley said, " the Physiological activities manifested by the complex whole represent the sum, or rather the resultant, of the separate and independent physiological activities resident in each of the simpler constituents of that whole. " If the resultant of this correlated physiological activity is to point in a positive direction, if it is to give scope for enhanced vito-dynamic influences of a desirable character, if stability is to be preserved and instability avoided, the general conduct - dietetic, emotional. sexual, etc. - of the individual must be of a biologically legitimate character. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.