The Goat Cheese wasn't Pasteurized

[Guest guest]

The goat would never have been born or cared for,

but for its human owners, who use some easily

replaceable milk to make life-giving food for their fellow

humans, such as my grateful self, raw-foodists who

appreciate the subtle energy of living foods, which we

experience as taste pleasure, but in a way unknown to

cooked-FUDE ingesters, who gulp it down so fast, with so many

condiments, flavorings, and beverages to cover up all the

poison. They punish themselves for the sin of killing all

those cattle and chickens, by cooking all their food, a

most deadly predilection.<br><br>I would not eat goat

unless absolutely necessary. I do eat yellowtail sashimi

because humans have been eating fish for 7 million years,

ever since we became the aquatic apes back then. If I

could, I would have enough tuna in a big salt-water tank

that I could anaesthesize one with nitrous oxide, cut

out a small (1/4 pound) fillet, fill the cut with

superglue and novacaine, and throw it back in, tagged so I

don't do it for another 2 months. Doing this three

times a week would only need a couple of dozen fish. No

killing required. <br><br>I admit that such a large

marine aquarium is ridiculously expensive, but I'm

making the point of answering any quasi-moral objections

to my only departures from vegetarianism. Speaking

strictly in nutritional terms, fish and goat cheese fit

right into the raw-food lifestyle, giving me the same

feeling of subtle-energy intake as do fruit and sprouts

(whereas raw eggs did not, so I never got into them).

<br><br>Land animals of any kind (bugs, reptiles, or mammals)

I reserve for situations of last resort, and I

would kill them with nitrous too, so there's no

death-stress in their flesh. I would not keep animals just to

kill them for eating, as long as normal food was

available. Fish, however, have no trouble healing up from

meal-sized painless nicks.

[Guest guest]

Say whaaaaaat????<br><br> & lt; & lt; & lt;If I could,

I would have enough tuna in a big salt-water tank

that I could anaesthesize one with nitrous oxide, cut

out a small (1/4 pound) fillet, fill the cut with

superglue and novacaine, and throw it back in, tagged so I

don't do it for another 2 months. Doing this three

times a week would only need a couple of dozen fish. No

killing required. & gt; & gt; & gt;<br><br>Uh, pardon me for

saying this, but isn't that a little barbaric? Isn't

superglue rather toxic? I dunno know, but the whole thing

sounds a little Frankensteinish to me. I certainly

wouldn't want smeone to hack a piece outta me and pour in

superglue then do it again every two months. No thanks! It

just sounds so cruel and unhealthy for the fish.

[Guest guest]

Hi Teri, I couldn't agree more.<br>I find it

incredible that anyone should even contemplate doinng that

with fish or any other creature. I suppose using that

kind of argument one could keep lizzards and eat their

tails, because a new one will grow! Ugh but the thought

of eating anything close ones own

flesh...ooooh!<br>Why go to this bother when it is so unnecessary.

There is so much natural food out there that is vegan

why make animals suffer. Our bodies are not designed

to eat raw flesh. I am going to post a 'humerous'

'story' about meat that so<br>me one sent me. Hope you

like it. It is different!<br>Chris.