Guest guest Posted November 20, 2000 Report Share Posted November 20, 2000 Dear Doug,<br><br>I don't like to disappoint you, but I am not opposed to eating meat.<br><br>I became interested in raw food by learning that the Eskimos ate raw meat and were healthy as a result.<br><br>I am not opposed to eating meat on religious grounds.<br><br>I am interested in eating raw food as a way to good health.<br><br>I suppose you could call me a secular, raw fooder who is happy to eat fish in very small amounts.<br><br>And I think that very small, expensive cuts of lean, red meat, grilled rare, are good for the health of women.<br><br>I quite understand your horror of meat, and I respect your decision not to eat it. Naturally, I expect the same respect.<br><br>Is the world big enough for both of us?<br><br>Victor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 21, 2000 Report Share Posted November 21, 2000 Victor of course the world is big enough for both of us, this is a great debate, look at the traffic on this board. This board is becomeing a fun place to go. <br><br>The reason I'm against eating meat has nothing to do with religion, but because I believe humans are physiologicly, vegetarians. Our intestines are to long to digest meat, it rots and turns to puss before it passes through. Our teeth are that of a vegetarian, we have more molars, and lack the long and sharp teeth of a carnivore. To facilitate grinding of vegetable foods our jaw can move up and down, and side to side, carnivors jaws only move up and down. Humans, as with all vegitarians have a refined lip and pouchy cheek stucture. Carnivors have no lip and no pouchy cheek structure. The shape of the face of a carnivore allows it to dig into a carcass and rip out the entrials. We do not have the properly shaped face to do this. All vegitarian animals drink water by suction, all carnivors drink by lifting water into the mouth with their tongue. If you are thinking perhaps humans are omnivores, what we call carnivores are actually omnivores, the first thing they eat is the contents of the intestins, which are vegetables. Carnivorous animals are imune to Salmonella.<br><br> We also are not capable of killing an animal without technology. All carnivorous animals can kill alone, and without tools. If you put a bunny and a banana in a crib with a baby, the baby will eat the banana and play with the bunny. The main reason people eat meat is because it is neatly packaged for us, if we had to hunt it down, kill it, and eat it raw, where it falls, there would be a lot more vegitarians.<br><br>Eskimos although they had lower risk to heart disease, and cholestoral, were not remarkably healthy, they did not have extended life spans. Just because people can live on certain foods doesn't mean that is the optimum diet. I don't think small amounts of cooked meat would harm you, just as small amounts of any toxic food wouldn't harm you, but I don't see any way it could be good for you. Even rare meat is cooked, the enzymes in meat are killed at lower tempratures than veggies. Under 110 degrees F. once the meat is cooked, the nutriants and minerals become biologicly unavalible to us, it is enzymes that catalyze the nutriants.<br><br> If you are concerned about Iron in meat, (hence the recomendation to women)meat is not a good source, because iron needs vitamin C to be properly obsorbed. Spinach, peas, beans, dandelions, and kale, all contain adequate iron and vtamin C. <br><br>man, this was a long one.<br>Doug Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.